Global Force USA Inc. awarded $4.67M for essential Job Corps security services in Oregon

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $46,704 ($46.7K)

Contractor: Global Force USA Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-03-09

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 144 days

Daily Burn Rate: $324/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: JOB CORPS PRIORITY 3 ESSENTIAL SERVICES ANGELL

Place of Performance

Location: YACHATS, LANE County, OREGON, 97498

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $46,704 to GLOBAL FORCE USA INC for work described as: JOB CORPS PRIORITY 3 ESSENTIAL SERVICES ANGELL Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 3. Services are for Job Corps priority 3 essential functions, indicating critical operational support. 4. The contract duration is 144 days, suggesting a short-term or interim need. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 points to security guard services. 6. The award is a delivery order, likely under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.67 million for approximately 4.8 months of service appears reasonable given the scope of essential security services for a Job Corps program. Benchmarking against similar security contracts for government facilities of comparable size and criticality would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overruns, but the per-diem cost needs to be evaluated against market rates for security personnel in Oregon.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With three bidders participating, the competition level suggests a healthy market for these services. This level of competition is generally expected to drive competitive pricing and ensure the government receives fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure essential security services at the most advantageous price point, preventing potential overpayment.

Public Impact

Job Corps students and staff in Oregon will benefit from enhanced security measures. Essential security and patrol services will be delivered to maintain a safe and secure environment. The geographic impact is focused on the Job Corps facility located in Oregon. The contract supports the employment of security personnel, contributing to the local workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service quality variations between bidders in a short-term contract.
Ensuring consistent adherence to security protocols throughout the contract period.
Managing the transition of security services effectively within the limited timeframe.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Focus on essential services ensures critical needs are met.

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is a significant component of the broader government contracting landscape. This contract falls under the security guards and patrol services industry, which is characterized by a mix of large and small providers. Government contracts for security are common across various agencies, often awarded through competitive bidding processes to ensure reliable protection of federal assets and personnel. The market size for security services is substantial, with government spending representing a key segment.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and there is no explicit small business set-aside indicated, the presence of multiple bidders could include small businesses. The subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not detailed in the provided data but are a potential avenue for small business participation if the prime contractor utilizes them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Forest Service, a division of the Department of Agriculture. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, and any issues could be subject to review by the agency's Inspector General.

Related Government Programs

Job Corps Program Support Services
Federal Security Guard Contracts
Department of Agriculture Security Contracts
Forest Service Operational Support

Risk Flags

Limited number of bidders may reduce competitive pressure.
Short contract duration could indicate interim need or potential for service disruption.
Need to verify contractor's past performance on similar federal contracts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $46,704 to GLOBAL FORCE USA INC. JOB CORPS PRIORITY 3 ESSENTIAL SERVICES ANGELL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GLOBAL FORCE USA INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $46,704.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-03-09. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the historical spending by the Forest Service on security guard and patrol services?

Historical spending data for the Forest Service on security guard and patrol services (NAICS 561612) would reveal trends in demand and investment in this area. Analyzing past contract awards, including their values, durations, and competition levels, can provide context for the current $4.67 million award. For instance, if the Forest Service typically awards similar contracts in the multi-million dollar range for similar durations, this award would align with historical patterns. Conversely, a significant deviation might warrant further investigation into the specific needs driving this particular contract. Understanding past spending also helps in benchmarking current pricing and assessing whether the government is achieving better value over time.

How does the per-day cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for security services in Oregon?

To assess the value for money, the per-day cost of this contract needs to be benchmarked against industry standards for security guard and patrol services in Oregon. The total award of $4.67 million over approximately 144 days yields a daily rate. Comparing this daily rate to average wages for security personnel, overhead costs, and profit margins typical in the Oregon market for similar services will indicate if the price is competitive. Factors such as the number of guards, their qualifications, hours of operation, and the specific security requirements of the Job Corps facility will influence this comparison. If the per-day cost is significantly higher than market averages, it could suggest potential overpricing or a need for more specialized, higher-cost services.

What are the specific 'priority 3 essential services' being provided under this contract?

The designation 'priority 3 essential services' implies a categorization of services deemed critical for the continuity of operations, particularly during disruptions or emergencies. For a Job Corps facility, these services likely encompass maintaining a secure perimeter, providing access control, responding to security incidents, and ensuring the safety of students and staff. Understanding the precise definition of 'priority 3' within the context of the Job Corps program and the Forest Service's operational guidelines is crucial. This would detail the specific security functions required, such as surveillance, emergency response protocols, and potentially escort services, which justify the contract's value and scope.

What is Global Force USA Inc.'s track record with federal security contracts, particularly with the Department of Agriculture or Forest Service?

Investigating Global Force USA Inc.'s past performance on federal contracts, especially those with the Department of Agriculture or its Forest Service, is key to assessing reliability and value. Reviewing their contract history can reveal their experience in delivering similar security services, their performance ratings, any past disputes or contract terminations, and their ability to manage government contracts effectively. A strong track record with relevant agencies suggests a lower risk of performance issues and a higher likelihood of successful service delivery. Conversely, a history of poor performance or unresolved issues could be a red flag, even with a competitive bid.

What is the typical duration and value of security contracts awarded by the Forest Service for similar facilities?

Examining the typical duration and value of security contracts awarded by the Forest Service for comparable facilities provides essential context for this $4.67 million delivery order. If the Forest Service commonly awards contracts of this magnitude for periods of around 4-5 months, it suggests this award is within normal parameters. However, if typical contracts are longer-term or significantly smaller/larger, it might indicate unique circumstances or a need for further scrutiny. Understanding these historical patterns helps in evaluating whether the current contract represents a standard operational need or a deviation that requires explanation, such as an interim solution or a response to a specific security concern.

How does the number of bidders (3) impact the potential for cost savings for the government in this full and open competition?

A competition with three bidders, while indicating some level of market interest, might not represent the highest degree of price pressure. Generally, a larger number of bidders tends to drive prices down more effectively due to increased competition. With only three bidders, there's a possibility that the market for these specialized security services is somewhat concentrated, or that other potential bidders were deterred for various reasons. While the firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, the government should still analyze the winning bid against estimated costs and market rates to ensure optimal value. Further analysis could explore if the limited number of bidders suggests potential market consolidation or barriers to entry.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8323 SOUTHWEST FWY, HOUSTON, TX, 77074

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $46,704

Exercised Options: $46,704

Current Obligation: $46,704

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSWA23D007B

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline