USDA awards $1.09M contract for warehouse addition in Buzzards Bay, MA, to Campbell Construction Group
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $1,093,193 ($1.1M)
Contractor: Campbell Construction Group, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture
Start Date: 2025-09-15
End Date: 2026-06-15
Contract Duration: 273 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCT WAREHOUSE ADDITION FOR FPML AT BUZZARDS BAY, MA
Place of Performance
Location: BUZZARDS BAY, BARNSTABLE County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02542
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Agriculture obligated $1.1 million to CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCT WAREHOUSE ADDITION FOR FPML AT BUZZARDS BAY, MA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a commercial building construction project of this scope. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The definitive contract type indicates a single order under a pre-existing agreement. 4. Project duration of 273 days is standard for this type of construction. 5. The contract is for a firm-fixed-price, which transfers risk to the contractor. 6. The award was made to a single contractor, Campbell Construction Group, LLC.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $1.09 million for a warehouse addition is within a reasonable range for commercial construction projects of this size and complexity. Benchmarking against similar projects in Massachusetts, the cost per square foot would need to be assessed, but the overall award amount does not immediately suggest overpricing. The firm-fixed-price structure also indicates that the contractor has assumed the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. While the specific number of bids received is not detailed, this procurement method generally fosters robust competition, which is expected to drive down prices and improve the quality of offers. The exclusion of sources clause might warrant further investigation if it significantly limited the pool of potential bidders.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the chances of securing the best value by encouraging multiple companies to bid, leading to more competitive pricing and potentially higher quality services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), which will gain expanded warehouse facilities. The project will deliver a new warehouse addition, enhancing operational capacity for APHIS. The geographic impact is localized to Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. The contract will likely create temporary employment opportunities for construction workers in the Massachusetts area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if the initial requirements are not clearly defined.
- Risk of delays due to unforeseen site conditions or permitting issues.
- Dependence on a single contractor for project completion.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risk for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive environment that should yield good value.
- Clear project duration provides a defined timeline for completion.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. The market for construction services is diverse, with numerous firms capable of undertaking such projects. The award to Campbell Construction Group, LLC, a company specializing in this area, aligns with typical government procurement practices for infrastructure development. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar warehouse construction projects in the region would provide further context on the value received.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside requirement. The prime contractor, Campbell Construction Group, LLC, may still choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their standard business practices, but this is not mandated by the contract terms.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified warehouse addition within the agreed-upon timeline and budget. Transparency is facilitated through the federal procurement data system, where contract awards are publicly reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Construction
- Warehouse and Storage Facilities
- Department of Agriculture Procurement
- Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Operations
Risk Flags
- Competition Type: 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' warrants review to ensure maximum competition was achieved.
- Contract Type: Definitive Contract - requires understanding the underlying agreement it references.
- Project Duration: 273 days is a significant timeframe; monitoring progress is key.
Tags
construction, warehouse, department-of-agriculture, animal-and-plant-health-inspection-service, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, buzzards-bay, massachusetts, commercial-building-construction, infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Agriculture awarded $1.1 million to CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC. CONSTRUCT WAREHOUSE ADDITION FOR FPML AT BUZZARDS BAY, MA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $1.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-15. End: 2026-06-15.
What is the track record of Campbell Construction Group, LLC with federal contracts?
Information regarding Campbell Construction Group, LLC's specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive review would involve searching federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG for past performance history, including contract values, types, agencies served, and any performance ratings or disputes. Understanding their experience with similar construction projects, particularly for government agencies, would be crucial for assessing their reliability and capability in executing this warehouse addition project.
How does the awarded price compare to similar warehouse construction projects in Massachusetts?
To benchmark the $1.09 million award, a detailed analysis of comparable warehouse construction projects in Massachusetts is necessary. This would involve identifying projects of similar size (square footage), complexity, and construction type (e.g., pre-engineered metal building vs. concrete structure) awarded within a relevant timeframe. Factors such as prevailing wage rates, material costs, and specific site conditions in Buzzards Bay would also need to be considered. Without this comparative data, it is difficult to definitively assess if the price represents excellent value for money.
What are the primary risks associated with this construction contract?
Key risks for this construction contract include potential delays due to unforeseen site conditions (e.g., soil issues, underground utilities), weather disruptions impacting the 273-day schedule, and contractor performance issues. Given it's a firm-fixed-price contract, the financial risk of cost overruns is primarily borne by Campbell Construction Group, LLC. However, significant delays or quality issues could still lead to disputes or require contract modifications. The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type also presents a minor risk if it unduly limited the bidder pool.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring project success for the government?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective for the government in ensuring project success when the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. It provides cost certainty by establishing a ceiling price, incentivizing the contractor to control costs and complete the project efficiently to maximize profit. For this warehouse addition, the FFP structure transfers the risk of cost escalation to the contractor, protecting the government from unexpected price increases. However, it requires meticulous upfront definition of requirements to avoid disputes or change orders.
What is the historical spending pattern for warehouse construction by the Department of Agriculture?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for warehouse construction by the Department of Agriculture (USDA) would involve reviewing procurement data over several fiscal years. This includes identifying the frequency, value, and types of warehouse construction contracts awarded, as well as the agencies within USDA that utilize them most. Understanding whether this $1.09 million contract is typical, an outlier, or part of a larger trend in USDA infrastructure investment would provide valuable context regarding the significance and potential future needs for similar facilities.
What is the significance of the 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' NAICS code (236220)?
The NAICS code 236220, 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction,' signifies that the primary activity of the contractor under this contract is the construction or remodeling of non-residential buildings. This includes a wide range of structures such as office buildings, warehouses, factories, retail stores, and public facilities. For this specific contract, it confirms the project involves building a warehouse addition, aligning with the description and indicating the type of specialized construction services being procured.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 12639525R0018
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 21 CALLER ST STE 4, PEABODY, MA, 01960
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $1,093,193
Exercised Options: $1,093,193
Current Obligation: $1,093,193
Actual Outlays: $365,458
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-15
Current End Date: 2026-06-15
Potential End Date: 2026-06-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-08
Other Department of Agriculture Contracts
- Usda Enterprise-Scale Fedramp Certified Cloud Hosting Services. Igf::ot::igf — $336.8M (Accenture Federal Services LLC)
- Usda Disc Enterprise Wide Salesforce Software&support Services — $294.8M (Carahsoft Technology Corp)
- Provide Removal of Carcasses AT Premise X Igf::ot::igf Hpai — $292.5M (Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc)
- Financial Management Modernization Initiative — $291.0M (Accenture LLP)
- Enterprise Application Services — $273.5M (Synergy Business Innovation & Solutions Inc.)