Agriculture Department awards $67,388 for farm machinery, with Deere & Company as the contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $67,388 ($67.4K)

Contractor: Deere & Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-06-08

Contract Duration: 62 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OCONEE RANGER DISTRICT VEH# 6789 REPLACEMENT - JOHN DEERE TRACTOR

Place of Performance

Location: GAINESVILLE, HALL County, GEORGIA, 30501

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $67,387.89 to DEERE & COMPANY for work described as: OCONEE RANGER DISTRICT VEH# 6789 REPLACEMENT - JOHN DEERE TRACTOR Key points: 1. The contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a focus on smaller value procurements. 2. The award was a Purchase Order, a common instrument for acquiring goods and services. 3. The contract has a firm fixed price, which transfers risk to the contractor. 4. The duration of the contract is relatively short at 62 days. 5. The procurement falls under the Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing sector. 6. The contractor, Deere & Company, is a major player in the agricultural equipment industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $67,387.89 for a John Deere tractor appears reasonable given the brand and potential specifications. Benchmarking against similar farm machinery purchases would provide a more definitive value assessment. The firm fixed price structure is a positive indicator for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which generally allows for broad competition among qualified sources. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP aims to ensure fair and open competition for procurements below certain thresholds.

Taxpayer Impact: Competition under SAP generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by encouraging multiple offers.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Oconee Ranger District of the Forest Service, which will receive a new tractor. The service delivered is the provision of essential farm machinery for land management and operational needs. The geographic impact is localized to Georgia, where the Oconee Ranger District is located. There are no direct workforce implications mentioned, but the tractor will support operational staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing sector (NAICS 333111). This sector includes establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing agricultural and construction machinery. Spending in this sector is driven by the needs of agriculture, forestry, and construction industries for specialized equipment. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other government purchases of similar heavy machinery.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus was on acquiring the necessary equipment through the most competitive means available under SAP.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded as a Purchase Order under Simplified Acquisition Procedures, which typically have streamlined oversight. Accountability is maintained through the firm fixed price and the delivery timeline. Transparency is generally good for SAP procurements, but specific details on the bidding process are not publicly detailed in this summary.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

farm-machinery, department-of-agriculture, forest-service, purchase-order, competed, firm-fixed-price, georgia, farm-machinery-and-equipment-manufacturing, simplified-acquisition-procedures

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $67,387.89 to DEERE & COMPANY. OCONEE RANGER DISTRICT VEH# 6789 REPLACEMENT - JOHN DEERE TRACTOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DEERE & COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $67,387.89.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-06-08.

What specific model and features does the John Deere tractor include, and how do these align with the Oconee Ranger District's operational requirements?

The provided data does not specify the exact John Deere tractor model or its features. To fully assess the value and suitability of this purchase, further details on the tractor's specifications (e.g., horsepower, attachments, intended use) would be necessary. Understanding the specific needs of the Oconee Ranger District, such as terrain, typical tasks (e.g., mowing, plowing, hauling), and required operational capacity, is crucial for determining if the selected tractor is the most appropriate and cost-effective solution. Without this information, it's challenging to definitively confirm if the purchase optimally meets the agency's requirements or if alternative equipment might have offered better performance or value for the intended purpose.

How does the $67,387.89 price compare to market rates for similar John Deere tractors or comparable farm machinery?

Benchmarking the $67,387.89 price against current market rates for similar John Deere tractors or comparable farm machinery is essential for a thorough value assessment. Factors such as the specific model, included attachments, warranty, and any applicable government discounts would influence the final price. Without access to detailed specifications of the awarded tractor and current dealer pricing or other government contract awards for similar equipment, a precise comparison is difficult. However, given that Deere & Company is a major manufacturer, the price could be competitive, especially if procured through a competitive process under SAP. Further research into industry pricing guides or recent federal procurement data for similar items would be needed for a definitive benchmark.

What was the competitive landscape for this procurement under SAP, and how many bids were received?

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which are designed to encourage competition for procurements below the simplified acquisition threshold. While the data indicates it was 'COMPETED UNDER SAP,' it does not specify the number of bids received or the names of other participating contractors. SAP typically involves soliciting quotes from multiple sources, often through online portals or direct outreach. The level of competition, even under SAP, can significantly influence pricing. A higher number of responsive bids generally leads to more favorable pricing for the government. Without the specific number of bidders, it's difficult to definitively assess the strength of the competition and its impact on the final award price.

What is the track record of Deere & Company in supplying farm machinery to the federal government, particularly the Department of Agriculture?

Deere & Company is a well-established and reputable manufacturer of agricultural and construction machinery, with a significant presence in both the commercial and government markets. They have a history of supplying equipment to various federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture and its various branches like the Forest Service. Their extensive dealer network and established product lines suggest a capacity to meet government procurement needs. While specific details on past performance for this exact type of tractor or contract vehicle are not provided, Deere & Company's long-standing reputation and market position generally indicate a reliable supplier for farm machinery. Past performance reviews and contract databases could offer more granular insights into their federal contracting history.

Are there any potential risks associated with this purchase, such as long-term maintenance costs or parts availability for the specific tractor model?

Potential risks associated with this purchase include long-term maintenance costs and parts availability. While Deere & Company has a broad service network, the availability and cost of specialized parts for the specific tractor model awarded could vary. The relatively short contract duration (62 days) might also imply that this is a one-time purchase or that ongoing maintenance and support are handled separately. It's important to consider the total cost of ownership, including routine maintenance, potential repairs, and the lifespan of the equipment, beyond the initial purchase price. Ensuring access to reliable service and affordable parts is crucial for maximizing the utility and value of the tractor over its operational life.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAgriculture, Construction, and Mining Machinery ManufacturingFarm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: TRACTORS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 12444026Q0048

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2000 JOHN DEERE RUN, CARY, NC, 27513

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $67,388

Exercised Options: $67,388

Current Obligation: $67,388

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-07

Current End Date: 2026-06-08

Potential End Date: 2026-06-08 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-07

More Contracts from Deere & Company

View all Deere & Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Agriculture Contracts

View all Department of Agriculture contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending