Lakeside Foods Inc. awarded $26.7K contract for canned peas, highlighting agricultural commodity procurement

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,740 ($26.7K)

Contractor: Lakeside Foods Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-07-15

Contract Duration: 98 days

Daily Burn Rate: $273/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 13

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000011256/4400002443/4100033961/PEAS CAN-6/10

Place of Performance

Location: PLAINVIEW, WABASHA County, MINNESOTA, 55964

State: Minnesota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $26,739.84 to LAKESIDE FOODS INC for work described as: COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000011256/4400002443/4100033961/PEAS CAN-6/10 Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential food commodities for U.S. government donations, supporting food security initiatives. 2. Procurement method was full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract value is relatively small, indicating a specific need for a particular commodity. 4. Delivery order structure suggests flexibility in fulfilling immediate or short-term requirements. 5. The fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government. 6. This award falls under the broader category of agricultural product procurement for federal use.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $26,739.84 for canned peas is modest. Without specific benchmarks for this exact commodity and quantity, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the use of full and open competition generally supports competitive pricing. The firm fixed-price structure also mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. This appears to be a standard procurement for a specific food item.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 13 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this agricultural commodity. This broad competition is expected to drive favorable pricing and ensure the government receives a fair market value for the peas.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a lower price than if it were sole-sourced or limited competition.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries include individuals and families receiving U.S. government food donations. Services delivered include the provision of canned peas, a staple food item. Geographic impact is primarily within Minnesota, where the vendor is located and potentially where the food will be distributed. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving existing production and logistics staff at Lakeside Foods Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited scalability if demand for food donations significantly increases beyond this contract's scope.
Reliance on a single vendor for this specific commodity delivery order.

Positive Signals

Award to a known entity (Lakeside Foods Inc.) suggests a degree of reliability.
Clear delivery dates and fixed pricing provide predictability.
Competition indicates a market capable of meeting government needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader food manufacturing and agricultural products sector. The market for canned goods is mature, with numerous suppliers. Government procurement of food commodities, particularly for donation programs, is a consistent activity. Benchmarks for similar canned vegetable contracts would typically consider volume, type of vegetable, and packaging, but this specific award appears to be for a standard, relatively small quantity.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it indicate specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Lakeside Foods Inc., a presumably larger entity, suggests that small business participation is not a primary focus of this particular procurement action. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved in the supply chain for Lakeside Foods.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle (implied by the structure), oversight may be managed through established procedures for such orders. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

USDA Food Donation Programs
Commodity Procurement Contracts
Agricultural Product Supply Chain

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruption if vendor faces production issues.
Limited vendor pool for this specific commodity in this instance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $26,739.84 to LAKESIDE FOODS INC. COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000011256/4400002443/4100033961/PEAS CAN-6/10

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LAKESIDE FOODS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Agricultural Marketing Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26,739.84.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-07-15.

What is the historical spending pattern for canned peas or similar commodities by the Agricultural Marketing Service?

Analyzing historical spending for canned peas or comparable canned vegetables by the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) requires accessing federal procurement data over several fiscal years. Typically, AMS procures a variety of agricultural commodities for domestic and international food assistance programs. Spending patterns can fluctuate based on program needs, agricultural output, commodity prices, and congressional appropriations. For canned peas specifically, awards might be sporadic, reflecting demand cycles or specific program requirements rather than consistent, high-volume procurement. Comparing the current $26,739.84 award to past awards would reveal if this is a typical quantity and value, or an outlier. A review of historical data might show larger, multi-year contracts for broader commodity baskets, or smaller, specific awards like this one for particular items. Factors such as the number of bidders in past solicitations and the resulting prices would also provide context on market competitiveness and value over time.

How does the number of bids (13) compare to similar procurements for canned vegetables?

A count of 13 bids for canned vegetables suggests a reasonably competitive market for this specific commodity under the terms of this solicitation. To assess if this is high or low, a comparison to similar procurements is necessary. Factors influencing the number of bids include the total contract value, the duration of the requirement, the geographic scope, the specific type and quantity of the vegetable, and the clarity of the solicitation's requirements. For smaller, specific requirements like this $26.7K award for canned peas, 13 bids could indicate strong interest. However, for larger, more comprehensive contracts for a wider range of vegetables or longer durations, a higher number of bids might be expected. Conversely, if the market for canned peas is highly consolidated or if the solicitation had restrictive requirements, 13 bids might represent a significant portion of the available bidders. Without direct comparative data on similar AMS solicitations for canned vegetables, it's difficult to definitively label 13 bids as high or low, but it does indicate a degree of market engagement.

What are the specific food donation programs this contract supports?

This contract for canned peas likely supports one or more of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) food donation programs, primarily managed by the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). Key programs that utilize procured commodities include the Food Purchase and Distribution Program (FPDP), which supplies food to various domestic nutrition assistance initiatives. This could encompass programs like the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP), or emergency food assistance efforts. Commodities are also sometimes allocated for international food aid. The specific designation of 'USG FOOD DONATIONS' in the data suggests a focus on domestic assistance. The canned peas would serve as a shelf-stable, nutritious component for meals provided to vulnerable populations, including low-income families, children, and the elderly, thereby contributing to national food security objectives.

What is the track record of Lakeside Foods Inc. as a government contractor?

Lakeside Foods Inc. has a history of engaging in federal contracting, as indicated by this award. To fully assess their track record, a comprehensive review of their past performance in federal procurement databases is necessary. This would involve examining the number and types of contracts awarded to them, their performance ratings on past contracts (if available), any instances of contract disputes or terminations, and their compliance history. For commodity suppliers like Lakeside Foods, consistent delivery of quality products on time and at agreed-upon prices are key performance indicators. Their ability to secure multiple contracts, especially under full and open competition, generally suggests a satisfactory performance history. However, a deeper dive into specific past awards, including any issues encountered, would provide a more robust understanding of their reliability and capabilities as a government supplier.

Are there any risks associated with procuring canned goods from a single vendor for a delivery order?

Procuring canned goods from a single vendor for a specific delivery order, as seen in this $26,739.84 award to Lakeside Foods Inc., carries some inherent risks, although they are mitigated by the nature of the contract. The primary risk is supply chain disruption; if Lakeside Foods encounters production issues, logistical problems, or quality control failures, the delivery of these peas could be delayed or compromised. This could impact the continuity of food donation programs relying on this specific commodity. However, because this is a single delivery order with a defined quantity and short delivery window (April 8 to July 15, 2026), the overall impact of a disruption is likely limited in scope and duration. The government also benefits from the firm fixed-price structure, which locks in the cost regardless of potential market fluctuations or increased production expenses for the vendor. The risk is primarily centered on timely and quality delivery rather than cost overruns.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Fruit and Vegetable Preserving and Specialty Food Manufacturing › Fruit and Vegetable Canning

Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 123J1425B0350

Offers Received: 13

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lakeside Foods, Inc.

Address: 2400 S 44TH ST, MANITOWOC, WI, 54220

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,740

Exercised Options: $26,740

Current Obligation: $26,740

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 123J1425D0053

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline