Agriculture Department awards $2.8M medical surveillance contract to OSF Multi-Specialty Group for one year

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,059 ($28.1K)

Contractor: OSF Multi-Specialty Group

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-13

End Date: 2027-04-12

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $77/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

Place of Performance

Location: PEORIA, PEORIA County, ILLINOIS, 61604

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $28,059 to OSF MULTI-SPECIALTY GROUP for work described as: OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a one-year occupational medical surveillance program. 2. Competition dynamics are unclear due to limited information on the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' status. 3. Risk indicators are low given the short duration and fixed-price nature of the contract. 4. Performance context suggests a need for ongoing occupational health services within the Agricultural Research Service. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader healthcare services supporting federal agencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.8 million for a one-year occupational medical surveillance program seems within a reasonable range for specialized medical services. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for occupational health services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs and provides predictability for the agency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under SAP (Small Acquisition Procedures), which typically involves a less extensive competition process than full and open competition. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to fully assess the level of competition. This method is often used for acquisitions below certain thresholds, aiming for efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: While SAP can lead to quicker awards, a more robust competition might have yielded better pricing for taxpayers. The limited competition could mean less downward pressure on the final price.

Public Impact

Federal employees within the Agricultural Research Service, particularly those in roles requiring occupational health monitoring, will benefit from these services. The contract will deliver essential medical surveillance services, likely including health screenings, monitoring, and record-keeping. The geographic impact is focused on Illinois, where the services will be provided. Workforce implications include ensuring the health and safety of federal employees, contributing to operational continuity.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition information under SAP limits assessment of best value.
Potential for higher costs due to simplified acquisition procedures compared to full and open competition.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Short contract duration (one year) limits long-term financial commitment and allows for re-evaluation.
Focus on occupational medical surveillance addresses a specific and necessary government function.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the healthcare services sector, specifically focusing on occupational health and medical surveillance. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous providers offering specialized programs. Federal agencies frequently contract for such services to ensure employee health and compliance with regulations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in contracts for similar medical support services provided to other government entities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As such, the primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be through potential subcontracting opportunities, which are not detailed here. Without specific subcontracting plans, it's difficult to assess the direct benefit to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract would typically reside with the contracting officer and program managers within the Agricultural Research Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is limited by the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation, which often involves less public documentation than larger, full-and-open competitions. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Occupational Health Services
Department of Agriculture Employee Health Programs
Agricultural Research Service Employee Support
Medical Laboratory Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition transparency
Potential for non-optimal pricing due to SAP competition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $28,059 to OSF MULTI-SPECIALTY GROUP. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OSF MULTI-SPECIALTY GROUP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Agricultural Research Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28,059.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-13. End: 2027-04-12.

What is the specific scope of services included in this occupational medical surveillance program?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of services. However, occupational medical surveillance programs typically include pre-placement evaluations, periodic health assessments, medical monitoring for specific hazards (e.g., chemical exposures, biological agents), fitness-for-duty evaluations, and exit examinations. Services may also encompass health education, record-keeping, and reporting to regulatory bodies. The exact services would be defined in the contract's statement of work, tailored to the risks and requirements of the Agricultural Research Service workforce.

How does the $2.8 million award compare to historical spending on similar services by the Agricultural Research Service or USDA?

Without historical spending data for this specific service within the Agricultural Research Service or the broader USDA, a direct comparison is not possible. However, $2.8 million for a one-year, comprehensive occupational medical surveillance program for a federal agency's workforce is a significant but not necessarily excessive amount. The cost would depend heavily on the number of employees covered, the frequency and type of screenings required, and the geographic distribution of the workforce. Benchmarking against contracts from other federal agencies with similar employee health needs would be a more effective approach to assess value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to evaluate the contractor's performance?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for occupational medical surveillance, KPIs might include metrics such as timeliness of appointments and reporting, accuracy of medical records, adherence to established medical protocols, client satisfaction (from both employees and management), and compliance with relevant health and safety regulations. The contract's statement of work would outline these specific performance standards and the methods for measuring them.

What is the track record of OSF Multi-Specialty Group in providing federal government contracts, particularly in healthcare services?

Information regarding OSF Multi-Specialty Group's specific track record with federal government contracts is not provided in the data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their past performance on similar federal healthcare or medical services contracts, including client feedback, any past performance evaluations, and any history of contract disputes or awards. Their experience with occupational health surveillance for large organizations, whether public or private, would also be a relevant factor in evaluating their capability.

What are the potential risks associated with a 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' contract for occupational medical surveillance?

Competing under Small Acquisition Procedures (SAP) can introduce certain risks compared to full and open competition. The primary risk is potentially receiving less competitive pricing, as the outreach to potential vendors is often more limited. This could result in a higher cost to the government than might be achieved through a broader solicitation. Additionally, the vetting process for vendors might be less rigorous, potentially increasing the risk of selecting a contractor with less experience or capability, although this is mitigated by agency due diligence. The limited transparency associated with SAP can also make it harder for external observers to assess the fairness and effectiveness of the procurement process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories › Medical Laboratories

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 800 NE GLEN OAK AVE, PEORIA, IL, 61603

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,059

Exercised Options: $28,059

Current Obligation: $28,059

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1232SA26D0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline