Agriculture Department awards $3,770 for GFCI outlet installation in Athens, Georgia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,770 ($3.8K)

Contractor: CAS FSE JV II LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-08-12

Contract Duration: 133 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: INSTALL GFCI OUTLET ON BUILDING ONE ROOF, ATHENS, GEORGIA

Place of Performance

Location: ATHENS, CLARKE County, GEORGIA, 30605

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $3,769.61 to CAS FSE JV II LLC for work described as: INSTALL GFCI OUTLET ON BUILDING ONE ROOF, ATHENS, GEORGIA Key points: 1. Contract value appears low, suggesting a focused scope of work. 2. Competition dynamics for this specific task are not immediately clear from the data. 3. Performance risk seems minimal given the nature of the service. 4. This contract is a small component within broader facilities support services. 5. The fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $3,770 for installing a GFCI outlet is relatively small. Benchmarking this specific service is challenging without more granular data on labor and material costs for similar installations in the Athens, Georgia area. However, given the limited scope, the price appears reasonable for a single outlet installation, assuming standard materials and labor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, specific sources were excluded, suggesting a potential limitation or a specific requirement that narrowed the field. The exact number of bidders is not provided, making it difficult to fully assess the level of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may have resulted in a slightly higher price than if it had been fully open to all potential bidders, though the small contract value likely mitigates significant taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

The Agricultural Research Service benefits from the improved electrical safety on Building One's roof. This contract ensures compliance with electrical safety standards for a critical facility component. The geographic impact is localized to Athens, Georgia. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team for a short duration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition impacting price discovery.
Lack of detailed performance metrics to assess contractor effectiveness.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Clear scope of work for a specific facility maintenance task.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a wide range of services for maintaining and operating buildings and grounds. The market for such services is broad, with many small and large businesses offering specialized trades like electrical work. The value of this specific contract is very small compared to the overall market for facilities maintenance.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to involve significant subcontracting opportunities given its small value and specialized nature. The primary contractor, CAS FSE JV II LLC, is likely a small business itself, but this award does not represent a strategic effort to boost the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Agricultural Research Service's facilities management division. Accountability is ensured through the fixed-price contract terms and the delivery order process. Transparency is moderate, with contract award data being publicly available, but detailed performance reports are not typically disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Electrical Services Contracts
Department of Agriculture Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for high cost per unit if scope is indeed only one outlet.
Limited competition may have impacted price discovery.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $3,769.61 to CAS FSE JV II LLC. INSTALL GFCI OUTLET ON BUILDING ONE ROOF, ATHENS, GEORGIA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CAS FSE JV II LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Agricultural Research Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,769.61.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-08-12.

What is the track record of CAS FSE JV II LLC in performing similar electrical installation services for federal agencies?

Information regarding CAS FSE JV II LLC's specific track record for similar electrical installation services for federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance history, one would need to review past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any reported issues or successes on federal procurement databases. Without this, it's difficult to gauge their experience and reliability for this specific task beyond the current award.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for GFCI outlet installations in Athens, Georgia?

Directly comparing the awarded price of $3,769.61 for a single GFCI outlet installation to precise market rates in Athens, Georgia, is challenging without specific local data. Typical costs for a single GFCI outlet installation can range from $100 to $300, depending on factors like complexity, accessibility, and whether new wiring is needed. The provided contract value seems exceptionally high for a single outlet, suggesting either the scope is much larger than described (e.g., multiple outlets, complex wiring, significant roof work) or the 'INSTALL GFCI OUTLET ON BUILDING ONE ROOF' description is a simplification of a more extensive facilities upgrade.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Potential risks for this contract are relatively low given its apparent scope. These could include minor delays in installation, unforeseen site conditions on the roof, or issues with material procurement. Mitigation strategies likely involve the fixed-price contract structure, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and timelines efficiently. The Agricultural Research Service would also have oversight to ensure the work meets safety and quality standards before final payment. The limited duration (133 days) also reduces the window for significant risks to materialize.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Agricultural Research Service in Georgia?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in Georgia would require accessing and aggregating data on past contracts awarded by ARS within that state. This would involve searching procurement databases for contracts categorized under facilities maintenance, repair, and operations, specifically within Georgia. Such an analysis could reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the distribution of awards among different contractors, providing context for the current $3,770 award.

Does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' clause indicate any specific concerns or limitations in the procurement process?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' clause suggests that the agency intended to compete the contract broadly but had specific reasons to exclude certain potential offerors. This exclusion could be based on factors like past performance, specific technical capabilities, or security requirements. While it aims for competition, the exclusion inherently limits the pool of bidders compared to true full and open competition. The rationale for exclusion would need further investigation to determine if it was justified and did not unduly restrict competition, potentially impacting price discovery.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 E CAMPUS VIEW BLVD, STE 250, COLUMBUS, OH, 43235

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,770

Exercised Options: $3,770

Current Obligation: $3,770

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 12405B24D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline