Agriculture Department awards $695K for Westlaw access, extending service through 2029

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $695,843 ($695.8K)

Contractor: West Publishing Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2029-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $635/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS TO ENTER INTO A FIRM FIXED PRICE PURCHASE ORDER FOR WESTLAW ON FEDLINK

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT PAUL, DAKOTA County, MINNESOTA, 55121

State: Minnesota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $695,842.8 to WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS TO ENTER INTO A FIRM FIXED PRICE PURCHASE ORDER FOR WESTLAW ON FEDLINK Key points: 1. Value for money hinges on utilization rates and the cost-effectiveness of Westlaw compared to alternative legal research platforms. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competed award, suggesting potential for price discovery, though the specific nature of the competition is not detailed. 3. Risk indicators are low, given the established nature of the service and the firm-fixed-price contract type. 4. Performance context is defined by the need for continuous legal research access for the Office of the Chief Financial Officer. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the information services sector, supporting essential government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $695,842.80 over approximately three years for Westlaw access appears reasonable for a federal agency's legal research needs. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for legal databases is challenging without more specific usage data. However, Westlaw is a widely used and generally accepted platform in the legal field, suggesting a degree of market acceptance and established pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under SAP (Small Acquisition Procedures), indicating that it was open to competition among eligible vendors. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, the use of SAP suggests that multiple offers were solicited and considered. This competitive process is intended to ensure fair pricing and access to the best value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competed award under SAP generally benefits taxpayers by fostering price competition and encouraging vendors to offer competitive terms, potentially leading to cost savings compared to sole-source procurements.

Public Impact

Federal legal professionals within the Department of Agriculture's Office of the Chief Financial Officer will benefit from access to comprehensive legal research tools. Essential services include access to case law, statutes, regulations, and legal analysis necessary for financial operations and compliance. The geographic impact is national, supporting the agency's operations across all locations where its financial officers are based. Workforce implications involve ensuring that legal and financial staff have the necessary resources to perform their duties effectively and efficiently.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader information services sector, specifically focusing on legal research platforms. The market for legal tech is competitive, with several major providers offering comprehensive databases. Federal agencies often procure these services through cooperative purchasing agreements like FedRAMP or through competitive solicitations to leverage economies of scale and ensure access to up-to-date legal information. The annual spending on such services by federal agencies can range from thousands to millions of dollars depending on the agency's size and needs.

Small Business Impact

The contract was competed under SAP, which generally allows for broader participation. However, the specific vendor, West Publishing Corporation, is a large business. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides for this particular award. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are unlikely to be significant given the nature of the service (software subscription). The impact on the small business ecosystem is minimal, as this contract primarily serves the direct needs of the large business vendor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the contracting officer and the program officials within the Department of Agriculture's Office of the Chief Financial Officer. The firm-fixed-price nature of the award simplifies oversight by focusing on delivery of the service as specified. Transparency is maintained through federal procurement databases where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

information-services, legal-research, department-of-agriculture, office-of-the-chief-financial-officer, competed, purchase-order, firm-fixed-price, westlaw, fedlink, sap, minnesota

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $695,842.8 to WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS TO ENTER INTO A FIRM FIXED PRICE PURCHASE ORDER FOR WESTLAW ON FEDLINK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Office of the Chief Financial Officer).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $695,842.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2029-03-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for Westlaw or similar legal research services within the Department of Agriculture?

Analyzing historical spending for Westlaw or comparable legal research services within the Department of Agriculture would provide crucial context for evaluating the current $695,842.80 award. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to determine if this represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment. Agencies often consolidate such procurements or renegotiate terms over time. Understanding past contract values, durations, and any competitive bidding processes used previously would help assess whether the current award represents good value for money and if pricing trends are favorable or unfavorable compared to prior periods. This information is vital for identifying potential cost efficiencies or areas where spending may have escalated.

How does the cost per user or per department compare to other federal agencies using Westlaw?

Benchmarking the cost per user or per department against similar federal agencies utilizing Westlaw is essential for assessing value for money. While the total contract value is $695,842.80, without knowing the number of authorized users or the specific departments covered, a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. Federal agencies often leverage cooperative purchasing agreements or negotiate enterprise-wide licenses that can significantly alter per-user costs. If this contract represents a standalone procurement for the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, its per-user cost might be higher than an agency that procures Westlaw on a much larger, consolidated scale. Obtaining data on the number of users and comparing it to publicly available contract data for other agencies would reveal if the Department of Agriculture is receiving a competitive rate.

What specific modules or features of Westlaw are included in this contract, and are they aligned with the agency's needs?

The effectiveness and value of the Westlaw subscription depend heavily on the specific modules and features included, and their alignment with the needs of the Department of Agriculture's Office of the Chief Financial Officer. Westlaw offers a tiered product structure, ranging from basic access to specialized analytical tools, practice-specific content, and advanced research functionalities. Understanding which of these are part of the $695,842.80 contract is crucial. If the contract includes only essential features, it might represent good value. However, if it includes premium features that are underutilized by the financial office staff, the value proposition diminishes. A thorough review of the contract's scope of work against the documented requirements of the end-users is necessary to confirm optimal alignment and prevent overspending on unnecessary capabilities.

What is the track record of West Publishing Corporation in fulfilling federal contracts for information services?

West Publishing Corporation, the provider of Westlaw, has a long-standing and generally positive track record in fulfilling federal contracts for legal information services. As a major player in the legal technology market, they are accustomed to the procurement processes and compliance requirements of government agencies. Their ability to consistently provide updated legal databases, reliable access, and customer support is critical. Federal agencies often rely on established vendors like West Publishing due to the critical nature of legal research. While specific performance metrics for this particular contract are not yet available as it is a new award, the company's overall reputation and experience suggest a low risk of performance failure. However, ongoing monitoring of service delivery and user satisfaction remains important.

Are there any known risks associated with the transition to or continued use of Westlaw for this agency?

The primary risks associated with the continued use of Westlaw for the Department of Agriculture's Office of the Chief Financial Officer are generally low, given the established nature of the service. Potential risks include vendor lock-in, where switching to a different provider in the future could be costly or disruptive. There's also a risk related to price escalation in future contract renewals if competition is not actively pursued or if market conditions change. Ensuring adequate user training and adoption is another factor; if staff are not proficient in using Westlaw's advanced features, the full value of the subscription may not be realized. Finally, cybersecurity risks, though managed by the vendor, are always a consideration for any cloud-based information service.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationWeb Search Portals, Libraries, Archives, and Other Information ServicesWeb Search Portals and All Other Information Services

Product/Service Code: BOOKS, MAPS, OTHER PUBLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Thomson Company Inc, the

Address: 2900 AMES CROSSING RD STE 100, EAGAN, MN, 55121

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,258,986

Exercised Options: $695,843

Current Obligation: $695,843

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-01

Current End Date: 2029-03-31

Potential End Date: 2029-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-06

More Contracts from West Publishing Corporation

View all West Publishing Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Agriculture Contracts

View all Department of Agriculture contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending