USDA's NFC seeks to split GovTA core application functionality for administrator roles, valued at $31.9M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,942 ($31.9K)

Contractor: Immixtechnology Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-08-01

End Date: 2026-04-09

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: NATIONAL FINANCE CENTER (NFC) IS REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS/SPLITTING OF FUNCTIONALITY FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR ROLE, TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GOVTA CORE APPLICATION.

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $31,941.55 to IMMIXTECHNOLOGY INC for work described as: NATIONAL FINANCE CENTER (NFC) IS REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS/SPLITTING OF FUNCTIONALITY FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR ROLE, TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GOVTA CORE APPLICATION. Key points: 1. The contract modification aims to enhance administrator role functionality within the GovTA Core Application. 2. This modification represents a strategic adjustment to existing IT infrastructure, rather than a new service. 3. The fixed-price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 4. The contract is awarded to IMMIXTECHNOLOGY INC, a known IT service provider. 5. The modification is expected to be completed by April 2026. 6. The National Finance Center (NFC) is the primary beneficiary of this functional enhancement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $31.9 million for IT services related to application modification appears reasonable within the context of federal IT spending. Benchmarking against similar contracts for application development or modification would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the nature of splitting functionality, the cost is likely driven by labor and integration efforts. The firm-fixed-price structure offers cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is generally expected to yield favorable pricing and innovative solutions for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method of competition suggests a robust market response.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and improves service quality.

Public Impact

Federal employees, particularly those in financial and administrative roles within the Department of Agriculture, will benefit from improved administrator functionalities. The services delivered involve modifications to the GovTA Core Application, enhancing its capabilities for managing administrator roles. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Agriculture's operational footprint, likely nationwide for its employees. Workforce implications include potential for streamlined administrative processes and improved user experience for IT administrators.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the 'splitting of functionality' is not clearly defined.
Dependence on the contractor for successful integration of modified functionalities.
Risk of disruption to existing administrator workflows during the transition period.

Positive Signals

Clear objective to enhance existing application functionality.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Award to a known contractor may indicate a good working relationship and understanding of requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on software development and modification services. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 ('Other Computer Related Services') encompasses a broad range of IT services. Federal IT spending is a significant portion of the overall budget, with agencies continually investing in modernizing and optimizing their core applications to improve efficiency and security. This contract aligns with the trend of agencies seeking to refine existing systems rather than undertaking entirely new development projects.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, IMMIXTECHNOLOGY INC, will likely manage the execution of this modification, and their subcontracting practices would determine any indirect impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of Agriculture's contracting officers and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor to deliver the specified modifications within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

GovTA Core Application
National Finance Center (NFC) IT Services
Department of Agriculture Financial Systems Modernization

Risk Flags

Potential for integration challenges between split functionalities.
Risk of scope creep if modification details are not precisely defined.
Dependence on contractor for successful implementation and testing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $31,941.55 to IMMIXTECHNOLOGY INC. NATIONAL FINANCE CENTER (NFC) IS REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS/SPLITTING OF FUNCTIONALITY FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR ROLE, TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GOVTA CORE APPLICATION.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is IMMIXTECHNOLOGY INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Office of the Chief Financial Officer).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31,941.55.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-08-01. End: 2026-04-09.

What is the specific nature of the 'splitting of functionality' for the administrator role, and how does it improve current processes?

The provided data does not detail the specific functionalities being split or the precise improvements expected. However, in IT contexts, splitting functionality often refers to modularizing components of an application to improve maintainability, scalability, or security. For administrator roles, this could mean creating distinct modules for different administrative tasks (e.g., user management, system configuration, data access control), allowing for more granular permissions, specialized tools, or easier updates to specific functions without impacting others. The improvement would likely stem from increased efficiency, reduced error rates, enhanced security through better access controls, or simplified administration for complex systems.

How does the $31.9 million value compare to similar IT application modification contracts within the federal government?

Benchmarking the $31.9 million value requires comparison with contracts for similar scope, complexity, and duration within the federal IT landscape. Contracts involving the modification or enhancement of core enterprise applications, especially those with broad administrative functions like the GovTA Core Application, can vary significantly. Factors influencing cost include the extent of the modifications, the number of user roles affected, the integration complexity with other systems, and the specific technologies involved. Without detailed scope information, a precise comparison is difficult, but $31.9 million is a substantial investment, suggesting significant functional changes or a complex integration process. Agencies often spend tens to hundreds of millions on major application overhauls or enhancements.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to assess the success of this contract modification?

The provided data does not specify the KPIs for this contract. However, typical KPIs for IT application modification contracts focus on successful delivery, performance, and user satisfaction. These could include: successful deployment of the modified functionalities by the specified deadline, adherence to the firm-fixed-price budget, reduction in administrator task completion time, decrease in administrator-related errors or support tickets, improved system uptime or performance metrics post-modification, and positive user feedback from administrators regarding the usability and effectiveness of the new functionalities. Formal acceptance testing and user acceptance testing (UAT) would be critical milestones.

What is IMMIXTECHNOLOGY INC's track record with the Department of Agriculture or similar federal agencies for IT modification projects?

Information regarding IMMIXTECHNOLOGY INC's specific track record with the Department of Agriculture or similar agencies for IT modification projects is not provided in the data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any available CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) reports. Generally, agencies award contracts to vendors with a demonstrated history of successful performance, especially for critical systems like the GovTA Core Application. The fact that they were awarded this modification suggests they likely have relevant experience or a positive past performance record with the agency or in similar IT service areas.

What are the potential risks associated with splitting functionality in a core application like GovTA, and how are they being mitigated?

Splitting functionality in a core application like GovTA carries risks such as increased complexity in managing interdependencies between modules, potential for integration issues, and the possibility of creating security vulnerabilities if not managed carefully. There's also a risk of disrupting existing workflows if the transition is not seamless. Mitigation strategies typically involve thorough architectural design and planning, rigorous testing (unit, integration, and user acceptance testing), clear definition of interfaces between modules, robust security protocols, and phased deployment plans. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract incentivizes the contractor to manage these risks effectively to stay within budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Address: 8444 WESTPARK DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,942

Exercised Options: $31,942

Current Obligation: $31,942

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0265X

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline