GAO awards $3.26M to Chickasaw Health Consulting for Human Capital services via sole-source contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,260,471 ($3.3M)
Contractor: Chickasaw Health Consulting, LLC
Awarding Agency: Government Accountability Office
Start Date: 2019-05-22
End Date: 2024-11-21
Contract Duration: 2,010 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICE CONSULTING SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20548
Plain-Language Summary
Government Accountability Office obligated $3.3 million to CHICKASAW HEALTH CONSULTING, LLC for work described as: HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICE CONSULTING SERVICES Key points: 1. Spending focuses on Human Resources Consulting Services. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about competition. 3. Contract duration extends over five years. 4. Potential for better value through competitive bidding.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value is $3.26 million over five years. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to benchmark pricing against similar services, raising concerns about potential overpayment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for human capital consulting services could lead to suboptimal use of taxpayer funds.
Public Impact
Citizens may question the justification for a sole-source award in a service area that could potentially attract multiple bidders. The long contract duration suggests a significant reliance on this specific vendor for critical human capital functions. Transparency regarding the necessity of sole-sourcing is crucial for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Long contract duration
- Lack of clear justification for sole-sourcing
Positive Signals
- Focus on essential human capital services
Sector Analysis
Human Capital consulting falls under professional services, often involving strategic advice and implementation for HR functions. Benchmarks vary widely based on scope and duration, but competitive processes typically yield better value.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Chickasaw Health Consulting, LLC. Analysis of its size and small business status relative to the contract value is not provided, but the sole-source nature limits opportunities for other small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) awarded this contract. Oversight would involve ensuring the services meet the stated needs and that the sole-source justification remains valid throughout the contract period.
Related Government Programs
- Human Resources Consulting Services
- Government Accountability Office Contracting
- GAO, Except Comptroller General Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks transparency.
- Potential for inflated costs due to lack of competition.
- Long contract duration may indicate a lack of vendor diversity.
- Insufficient information on performance metrics and value assessment.
Tags
human-resources-consulting-services, government-accountability-office, dc, definitive-contract, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Government Accountability Office awarded $3.3 million to CHICKASAW HEALTH CONSULTING, LLC. HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICE CONSULTING SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHICKASAW HEALTH CONSULTING, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Government Accountability Office (GAO, Except Comptroller General).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-05-22. End: 2024-11-21.
What specific circumstances justified the sole-source award for these human capital consulting services, and were alternatives explored?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of market availability. For human capital consulting, agencies must demonstrate why only one vendor can meet the requirement. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if taxpayer funds were used efficiently or if competitive alternatives were overlooked, potentially leading to missed savings.
How does the pricing structure and overall cost compare to similar human capital consulting contracts awarded competitively?
Benchmarking pricing for sole-source contracts is challenging due to the absence of competitive bids. A thorough review would involve comparing the labor hours, rates, and total value against publicly available data for similar GAO or agency contracts that underwent a competitive procurement process. This comparison is crucial to identify potential cost inefficiencies and ensure fair market value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is the effectiveness of the consulting services being measured?
Measuring the effectiveness of human capital consulting requires clearly defined KPIs tied to the specific objectives of the engagement, such as improved employee retention, streamlined HR processes, or enhanced organizational efficiency. The agency must have robust mechanisms in place to track these metrics and assess the vendor's performance against them to ensure the services deliver tangible value and meet the intended outcomes.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Human Resources Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2600 JOHN SAXON BLVD STE 119, NORMAN, OK, 73071
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,432,414
Exercised Options: $3,260,471
Current Obligation: $3,260,471
Actual Outlays: $193,918
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: PRODUCTS OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-05-22
Current End Date: 2024-11-21
Potential End Date: 2024-11-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-19
Other Government Accountability Office Contracts
- Ffp&t&m Hybrid Task Order From Nitaac With Base Period and Five (5) Optional Periods With Optional Clins in Support of the IT Operations, Engineering and Enhancement Support Services (oeess) for the GAO Ists Program — $137.6M (Salient Crgt, Inc.)
- Commerical Facilities Management — $79.4M (Unicco Government Services, Inc)
- Wits-3 Telecommunication Services for FY 2014-2015. Igf::ot::igf — $28.8M (Verizon Federal Inc.)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a Task Order Against Gsas Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) Contract With a Base and Eight (8) Option Periods, for GAO Network/Data, Voice and Managed Services — $25.9M (Lumen Technologies Government Solutions, Inc.)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a Bridge Contract for It-Oeess While the NEW TIS Contract Award IS Undergoing a Protest — $20.4M (Salient Crgt, Inc.)