DoD's $30.3M Fort Bragg HQ Facilities Project Awarded to Empower AI, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,339,729 ($30.3M)
Contractor: Empower AI, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-01
End Date: 2011-12-31
Contract Duration: 851 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: THE PROJECT PROVIDES SUPPORT OF THE NEW COMBINED HEADQUARTERS FACILITIES FOR THE U.S. ARMY FORCES COMMAND (FORSCOM) HEADQUARTERS AND U.S. ARMY RESERVE COMMAND (USARC) HEADQUARTERS BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) RELOCATION FROM THE MULTIPLE SITES IN THE ATLANTA, GEORGIA, AREA TO FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA.
Place of Performance
Location: FORT HUACHUCA, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85613, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.3 million to EMPOWER AI, INC. for work described as: THE PROJECT PROVIDES SUPPORT OF THE NEW COMBINED HEADQUARTERS FACILITIES FOR THE U.S. ARMY FORCES COMMAND (FORSCOM) HEADQUARTERS AND U.S. ARMY RESERVE COMMAND (USARC) HEADQUARTERS BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) RELOCATION FROM THE MULTIPLE SITES IN THE ATLANTA, GEORGIA, AREA… Key points: 1. The project supports the relocation and consolidation of U.S. Army Forces Command and U.S. Army Reserve Command headquarters to Fort Bragg. 2. Awarded to Empower AI, Inc. under full and open competition. 3. The contract value is $30.3 million with a duration of 851 days. 4. This project falls under the Wired Telecommunications Carriers sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $30.3 million for facilities support seems reasonable given the scope of consolidating two major Army commands. Benchmarking against similar large-scale infrastructure projects would provide a clearer picture of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for price discovery and selection of the most advantageous offer. This method generally leads to competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for this significant infrastructure project, with the expectation that competitive bidding ensures efficient use of resources.
Public Impact
Consolidation of Army command facilities aims to improve operational efficiency and reduce costs. Relocation to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, impacts regional economies and military infrastructure. The project involves significant construction and telecommunications support, requiring specialized expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in large-scale construction and relocation projects.
- Dependence on a single contractor (Empower AI, Inc.) for critical support services.
- Uncertainty in long-term operational benefits post-consolidation.
Positive Signals
- Clear objective of consolidating command facilities for efficiency.
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a fair process.
- Significant investment in military infrastructure at Fort Bragg.
Sector Analysis
This project falls within the construction and telecommunications sectors, supporting the physical infrastructure and IT needs of military headquarters. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale facility consolidations are difficult to ascertain without more specific project details.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army, under the Department of Defense, is responsible for oversight. The contract type (Firm Fixed Price) suggests a defined scope, but monitoring for scope creep and performance is crucial.
Related Government Programs
- Wired Telecommunications Carriers
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for schedule delays impacting operational readiness.
- Risk of cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during construction.
- Dependence on contractor's technical expertise for critical infrastructure.
- Challenges in integrating diverse systems from multiple former locations.
Tags
wired-telecommunications-carriers, department-of-defense, az, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.3 million to EMPOWER AI, INC.. THE PROJECT PROVIDES SUPPORT OF THE NEW COMBINED HEADQUARTERS FACILITIES FOR THE U.S. ARMY FORCES COMMAND (FORSCOM) HEADQUARTERS AND U.S. ARMY RESERVE COMMAND (USARC) HEADQUARTERS BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) RELOCATION FROM THE MULTIPLE SITES IN THE ATLANTA, GEORGIA, AREA TO FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EMPOWER AI, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-01. End: 2011-12-31.
What are the projected long-term cost savings from consolidating these two headquarters facilities?
The projected long-term cost savings are not explicitly detailed in the provided data. However, the consolidation aims to streamline operations, reduce redundant infrastructure, and improve resource allocation, which are expected to yield financial benefits over time. A thorough cost-benefit analysis would be required to quantify these savings accurately.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this facility consolidation project?
Key performance indicators for this project would likely include on-time and within-budget completion of the facility construction and relocation, successful integration of IT and telecommunications systems, and measurable improvements in operational efficiency for FORSCOM and USARC. Post-occupancy evaluations assessing functionality and user satisfaction would also be critical.
How will the success of Empower AI, Inc.'s performance be evaluated throughout the contract duration?
Empower AI, Inc.'s performance will be evaluated based on adherence to the firm fixed price, meeting project milestones, quality of work, and compliance with all contract terms and conditions. The Department of the Army will likely conduct regular performance reviews and inspections to ensure the contractor is meeting its obligations effectively.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Wired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite) › Wired Telecommunications Carriers
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: NCI, Inc. (UEI: 195313866)
Address: 11730 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $40,309,809
Exercised Options: $30,339,729
Current Obligation: $30,339,729
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9128Z06D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-01
Current End Date: 2011-12-31
Potential End Date: 2011-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-09-28
More Contracts from Empower AI, Inc.
- Digit Award. to Enable GSA IDT to Leverage Infrastructure-Led Disruption to Drive Digital Transformation and Deliver Continuous Improvement and Continuous Business Value to ITS Customers — $328.7M (General Services Administration)
- Systems Engineering and Technical Assitance (seta) Support Services for PEO Soldier and PM Subordinates — $220.5M (Department of Defense)
- JSP Service Delivery — $212.7M (Department of Defense)
- THE Cert Program Calculates Bi-Annual Improper Payment Rates Based on the Results of the Reviews Conducted. These Rates Include an Overall National Medicare FFS Improper Payment Rate and Improper Payment Rates for Each Claim Type [part a Inpatient Hospital Prospective Payment System (PPS); Part a Excluding Inpatient Hospital PPS; Part B; and Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (dmepos)]. the Cert Program Ensures a Statistically Valid Random Sample; Therefore, the Improper Payment Rate Calculated From This Sample IS Considered to BE Reflective of ALL of Claims Processed by Medicare FFS Program During the Report Period. CMS Also Uses the Cert Program to Perform Special Studies and Supplemental Measurements to Determine the Improper Payment Rates of Particular Claim Types. Calculations of These Rates Facilitate CMS Ability to Take Appropriate Corrective Actions to Reduce Improper Payments — $206.7M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- National Capital Region (NCR) IT Support Services — $150.1M (Department of the Interior)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)