DoD Awards $146M Task Order to VSE Corporation for Aircraft Parts Manufacturing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $145,971,380 ($146.0M)

Contractor: VSE Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-09-30

End Date: 2011-01-30

Contract Duration: 852 days

Daily Burn Rate: $171.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: NEW TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22310

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $146.0 million to VSE CORPORATION for work described as: NEW TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $145.97M awarded to VSE Corporation. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract is for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing'. 4. The contract duration is 852 days, ending January 30, 2011.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded on a Time and Materials basis, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The total award value is substantial, but without specific performance metrics or cost breakdowns, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders likely participated. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing, though the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants scrutiny.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for aircraft parts manufacturing. The competitive nature of the award is positive, but the Time and Materials contract type requires diligent oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Public Impact

Supports the Department of the Army's aviation readiness and maintenance. Contributes to the broader aerospace and defense manufacturing sector. Potential impact on supply chain stability for critical aircraft components.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts. Spending in this sector is driven by military readiness requirements and technological advancements. Benchmarks for similar contracts would depend on the specific parts and complexity involved.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the primary contractor is VSE Corporation. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses on this specific task order.

Oversight & Accountability

The Time and Materials contract type necessitates robust oversight from the Department of the Army to monitor labor hours, material costs, and prevent scope creep. Regular performance reviews and audits are crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $146.0 million to VSE CORPORATION. NEW TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VSE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $146.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-30. End: 2011-01-30.

What specific aircraft parts or components were procured under this task order, and how do their costs compare to industry standards?

The provided data classifies the procurement under 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' but lacks specifics on the exact components. A detailed analysis would require access to the task order's statement of work and itemized cost breakdowns to compare against industry benchmarks and ensure fair pricing for the taxpayer.

What mechanisms were in place to mitigate cost risks associated with the Time and Materials contract type?

While awarded under full and open competition, the Time and Materials (T&M) structure inherently carries cost risk. Effective mitigation would typically involve clearly defined labor categories with capped rates, stringent approval processes for material purchases, and regular performance reviews by the contracting officer to ensure efficient execution and prevent unnecessary expenditures.

How did the competitive bidding process under 'full and open competition' ensure the best value was achieved for the government?

Full and open competition theoretically maximizes the number of potential bidders, driving down prices through market forces. However, the ultimate value achieved also depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria used, and the government's ability to negotiate favorable terms, especially given the T&M pricing structure which requires careful management post-award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2550 HUNTINGTON AVE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22303

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $146,027,217

Exercised Options: $146,026,883

Current Obligation: $145,971,380

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB012

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-09-30

Current End Date: 2011-01-30

Potential End Date: 2011-01-30 12:01:00

Last Modified: 2016-09-30

More Contracts from VSE Corporation

View all VSE Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending