DoD awards $17.9M contract to URS Federal Services for aircraft parts, full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,948,324 ($17.9M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-08-29

End Date: 2009-12-16

Contract Duration: 1,205 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73110

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.9 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $17.9M for aircraft parts. 2. Awarded to URS Federal Services Inc. 3. Procured under full and open competition. 4. Contract duration of 1205 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded on a Time and Materials basis, which can lead to higher costs if not managed closely. Benchmarking against similar aircraft parts contracts is difficult without more specific data on the parts procured.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure may limit price discovery compared to fixed-price contracts.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers by promoting competitive pricing. The T&M structure warrants careful oversight to ensure cost efficiency.

Public Impact

Ensures availability of critical aircraft parts for the Department of Defense. Supports URS Federal Services Inc. and its supply chain. Contributes to the defense industrial base. Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts. Spending in this area is critical for military readiness and is subject to rigorous oversight.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this contract, as it was awarded to URS Federal Services Inc. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense and managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency. Oversight would focus on ensuring timely delivery, quality of parts, and cost control under the T&M structure.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ok, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.9 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-08-29. End: 2009-12-16.

What specific aircraft parts were procured under this contract, and how do their costs compare to market rates?

The provided data does not specify the exact aircraft parts. A detailed review of the contract's deliverables and associated invoices would be necessary to compare procurement costs against market rates. Without this, assessing value for money is challenging, especially given the Time and Materials pricing.

What measures were in place to mitigate cost risks associated with the Time and Materials pricing model?

Effective oversight by the Defense Contract Management Agency would be crucial. This includes monitoring labor hours, material costs, and ensuring that the contractor's rates are fair and reasonable. Establishing cost ceilings and requiring detailed justifications for all charges are standard mitigation strategies.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best possible price and quality for these aircraft parts?

Full and open competition theoretically allows multiple qualified vendors to bid, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. However, the Time and Materials contract type can obscure the true cost-effectiveness until the contract is completed. The agency's evaluation criteria would have determined the balance between price and technical factors.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,944,374

Exercised Options: $17,944,374

Current Obligation: $17,948,324

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-08-29

Current End Date: 2009-12-16

Potential End Date: 2009-12-16 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-01-31

More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.

View all URS Federal Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending