DoD Awards $31M for Aircraft Structural Component Repair, Competition Limited by Specific Needs
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $31,005,010 ($31.0M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-01-26
End Date: 2010-09-15
Contract Duration: 1,693 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200605!000189!5700!FA8108!OC-ALC/LAD CFT !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0161 ! !20060126!20070127!020205527!073871048!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY !MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!24915!053!53!FORT LEWIS !PIERCE !WASHINGTON!+000001484000!N!N!000000000000!J015!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!004!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !2100! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73110
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $31.0 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200605!000189!5700!FA8108!OC-ALC/LAD CFT !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0161 ! !20060126!20070127!020205527!073871048!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY !MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!24915!053!53!FORT LEWIS !PIER… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC. for $31M. 2. Focuses on maintenance and repair of aircraft structural components. 3. Competition was full and open, but specific technical requirements may limit bidders. 4. Contract duration is over 4 years, indicating a significant, ongoing need. 5. The award is managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $31M over approximately 4.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific unit cost data or comparison points for similar repair services, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the time and materials pricing structure can sometimes lead to higher costs if not closely managed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition. However, the specialized nature of aircraft structural component repair likely means only a limited number of firms possess the necessary technical expertise and certifications, potentially impacting the breadth of competition in practice.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential aircraft maintenance. While competition aims for best value, the time and materials nature of the contract requires diligent oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and justified.
Public Impact
Ensures readiness of military aircraft by maintaining structural integrity. Supports jobs within the aerospace maintenance and repair sector. Contributes to the operational capability of the U.S. Air Force. Potential for cost overruns if not managed effectively due to time and materials.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials pricing can lead to cost overruns.
- Specific technical requirements may limit competition.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Essential for military aircraft readiness.
- Supports a specialized industry.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on aircraft maintenance and repair. Spending in this area is critical for national security and operational readiness. Benchmarks for such specialized repair services are highly dependent on the specific aircraft type and component complexity.
Small Business Impact
While the contract was awarded to LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC., the data does not indicate if this is a small business. The nature of specialized aircraft structural repair often favors larger, established companies with specific certifications and capabilities, potentially limiting small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Defense Contract Management Agency is responsible for overseeing this contract. Diligent oversight is crucial, especially given the Time and Materials pricing structure, to ensure that costs are reasonable, work is performed efficiently, and taxpayer funds are used appropriately.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- Limited competition may exist in practice despite full and open award.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
- Dependence on specific vendor capabilities.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ok, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $31.0 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200605!000189!5700!FA8108!OC-ALC/LAD CFT !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0161 ! !20060126!20070127!020205527!073871048!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY !MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!24915!053!53!FORT LEWIS !PIERCE !WASHINGTON!+000001484000!N!N!000000000000!J015!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $31.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-01-26. End: 2010-09-15.
What is the average hourly rate for the labor provided under this contract, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar skilled labor?
The provided data does not include specific hourly rates for labor. To assess value, a comparison of the average labor rates charged by LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC. against established industry benchmarks for aircraft structural repair technicians and engineers would be necessary. This would help determine if the rates are competitive and reflect fair market value for the expertise required.
What mechanisms are in place to mitigate the risk of cost overruns inherent in a Time and Materials contract for complex aircraft repairs?
Effective mitigation strategies would include robust government oversight, detailed work breakdown structures, regular progress reviews, and potentially establishing cost ceilings or fixed-price components for specific tasks. The contracting officer's representative (COR) plays a vital role in monitoring labor hours, material costs, and ensuring that all expenditures are directly linked to contract requirements and are reasonable.
How will the effectiveness of the structural repairs be measured to ensure long-term airworthiness and safety of the aircraft?
Effectiveness is typically measured through adherence to stringent technical specifications, quality assurance inspections, post-repair testing, and performance monitoring throughout the aircraft's operational life. The contract likely includes specific acceptance criteria and performance standards that must be met. Feedback from flight operations and maintenance logs will also contribute to assessing the long-term effectiveness of the repairs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)
Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-01-26
Current End Date: 2010-09-15
Potential End Date: 2010-09-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-06-06
More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)