DoD Awards $40M for ICTAT to VSE Corp, Ship Building & Repair

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $40,045,945 ($40.0M)

Contractor: VSE Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-03-04

End Date: 2012-01-29

Contract Duration: 696 days

Daily Burn Rate: $57.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ICTAT FOR EGYPT FOR FMS CASE EG-P-GIG

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22310

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $40.0 million to VSE CORPORATION for work described as: ICTAT FOR EGYPT FOR FMS CASE EG-P-GIG Key points: 1. Contract awarded to VSE Corporation for ICTAT system. 2. Significant spending in Ship Building and Repair sector. 3. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources used. 4. Contract duration of 696 days. 5. Cost Plus Award Fee contract type.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee structure can lead to costs exceeding initial estimates if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar ship building and repair contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive process was initiated. However, the 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation into why specific sources were excluded.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for a critical defense system, with the final cost influenced by performance incentives within the award fee structure.

Public Impact

Supports critical defense capabilities for Egypt through Foreign Military Sales. Impacts the shipbuilding and repair industry, a key sector for national security. Ensures technological readiness for naval operations. Potential for cost overruns due to the Cost Plus Award Fee structure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 57 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Ship Building and Repair sector, which is a significant area of defense spending. Benchmarks for ICT systems within this sector are highly specialized and depend on the specific technology deployed.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Navy, as the contracting agency, is responsible for oversight. The 'exclusion of sources' aspect of the competition method may require additional scrutiny to ensure fairness and value.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

ship-building-and-repairing, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $40.0 million to VSE CORPORATION. ICTAT FOR EGYPT FOR FMS CASE EG-P-GIG

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VSE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $40.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-03-04. End: 2012-01-29.

What specific ICTAT functionalities were procured, and how do they align with Egypt's defense modernization needs?

The ICTAT (Information, Communications, and Technology Assistance) system likely provides critical communication and data management capabilities for military operations. Its specific functionalities would be tailored to Egypt's defense requirements, potentially including command and control, intelligence sharing, or logistical support systems, all crucial for modernizing their armed forces.

What were the primary reasons for excluding specific sources during the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' process?

Excluding sources in a full and open competition typically occurs when specific capabilities, security clearances, or proprietary technologies are required that only a limited number of vendors possess. This ensures that the awarded contract meets stringent technical or security prerequisites, though it necessitates clear justification to maintain competitive fairness and avoid potential protests.

How effectively did the Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivize VSE Corporation to deliver value within the $40 million budget?

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure allows for reimbursement of costs plus an additional fee based on performance. To assess effectiveness, one would need to examine the award fee criteria, the achieved performance metrics, and the final cost relative to the target. A well-defined CPAF can drive performance, but poorly structured criteria can lead to inflated costs without commensurate value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingShip and Boat BuildingShip Building and Repairing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTNON-NUCLEAR SHIP REPAIR

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N0002404R4206

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6348 WALKER LANE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $40,045,945

Exercised Options: $40,045,945

Current Obligation: $40,045,945

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0002405D4204

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-03-04

Current End Date: 2012-01-29

Potential End Date: 2012-02-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-12-05

More Contracts from VSE Corporation

View all VSE Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending