DoD's $17.5M Contract for Aircraft Parts Maintenance Awarded to Lear Siegler Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,947,085 ($14.9M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1999-08-28
End Date: 2010-09-15
Contract Duration: 4,036 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 199912!5700!0355!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDIC !F3460197D0423 !A!*!0135 !19990828!19990930!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!2AAC5!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC. !3100 S I 35 !OKLAHOMA CITY !OK!73129!55000!017!40!OKLAHOMA CITY !CANADIAN !OKLAHOMA !0001!+000000397105!N!N!000000000000!J023!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/VEHICLES-TRAILERS-CYCLES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !3728!5!B!S!C!B!A!*!A !U!Y!2!007!B!* !C!Y!Z!* !* !N!C!*!C!A!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73110
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 199912!5700!0355!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDIC !F3460197D0423 !A!*!0135 !19990828!19990930!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!2AAC5!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC. !3100 S I 35 !OKLAHOMA CITY !OK!73129!55000!017!40!OKLAHOMA CITY !CANADI… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $17.5 million, was awarded to Lear Siegler Services, Inc. for maintenance and repair of aircraft parts. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration was 4036 days, spanning from August 1999 to September 2010. 4. The primary sector is Defense, specifically related to aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. 5. The contracting agency was the Defense Contract Management Agency, with the Department of Defense as the overall agency.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $17.5 million over approximately 11 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific per-unit data or comparison to similar maintenance contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is a positive sign for taxpayer value, as it implies the government sought the best price and performance through a bidding process.
Public Impact
This contract supports the operational readiness of military aircraft by ensuring the maintenance and repair of essential parts. The long duration of the contract indicates a sustained need for these services within the Department of Defense. The award to Lear Siegler Services, Inc. highlights the role of private sector contractors in supporting military logistics and maintenance operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 11 years) may indicate potential for cost overruns or scope creep if not managed effectively.
- Lack of specific per-unit cost data makes it difficult to benchmark efficiency.
- The 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' NAICS code is broad, potentially encompassing a wide range of services.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Contract supports critical defense needs for aircraft maintenance.
- The contracting agency (DCMA) is responsible for oversight of defense contracts.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting the maintenance and repair of aircraft components. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and operational capability. Benchmarks for similar maintenance contracts can vary widely based on the specific aircraft and components involved.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the prime contractor is Lear Siegler Services, Inc. There is no explicit information provided regarding small business participation or subcontracting in this award. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Their role includes ensuring compliance with contract terms, quality assurance, and timely delivery, which are critical for accountability in defense spending.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration.
- Time and Materials contract type.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown or per-unit pricing.
- Potential for scope creep over an 11-year period.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ok, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 199912!5700!0355!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDIC !F3460197D0423 !A!*!0135 !19990828!19990930!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!2AAC5!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC. !3100 S I 35 !OKLAHOMA CITY !OK!73129!55000!017!40!OKLAHOMA CITY !CANADIAN !OKLAHOMA !0001!+000000397105!N!N!000000000000!J023!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/VEHICLES-TRAILERS-CYCLES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !3728!5!B!S!C!B!A!*!A !U!Y!2!0
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1999-08-28. End: 2010-09-15.
What was the average annual cost of this contract, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar aircraft maintenance services?
The total contract value was $17,540,684.20 over a period of 4036 days (approximately 11 years). This averages to roughly $1.6 million per year. Direct comparison to industry benchmarks is challenging without knowing the specific types of aircraft parts and the scope of maintenance performed. However, this annual figure provides a baseline for evaluating the cost-effectiveness relative to the services rendered.
Given the long duration, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost increases or performance degradation over the contract's life?
The contract type is 'Time and Materials' (PT), which can be susceptible to cost increases if not closely monitored. While the data doesn't detail specific oversight mechanisms, effective management would typically involve regular performance reviews, audits, and potentially contract modifications to adjust for inflation or scope changes. The long duration necessitates robust oversight from the DCMA to ensure continued value and performance.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value for the taxpayer in this specific instance?
The 'full and open competition' award suggests a competitive environment was established, which is generally favorable for taxpayer value. However, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the number and quality of bids received, the clarity of the solicitation, and the evaluation criteria used. Without access to the bidding details, it's presumed the process yielded the best available offer at the time, but a deeper analysis of the bidding landscape would be needed for a definitive conclusion.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)
Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 1999-08-28
Current End Date: 2010-09-15
Potential End Date: 2010-09-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-06-06
More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)