Army awards $472M contract for SINCGARS radio systems to L3Harris Technologies

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,196,495 ($47.2M)

Contractor: L3harris Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-12-11

End Date: 2012-04-30

Contract Duration: 871 days

Daily Burn Rate: $54.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: SINGLE CHANNEL GROUND AND AIRBORNE RADIO SYSTEM (SINCGARS)

Place of Performance

Location: FORT WAYNE, ALLEN County, INDIANA, 46818

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $47.2 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: SINGLE CHANNEL GROUND AND AIRBORNE RADIO SYSTEM (SINCGARS) Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in tactical communication systems. 2. L3Harris Technologies, a major defense contractor, secured this award. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract (871 days) indicates a medium-term supply requirement. 5. The award type (Firm Fixed Price) shifts cost risk to the contractor. 6. The contract falls within the Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value of $471,964,950 for the SINCGARS system appears substantial. Benchmarking this against similar tactical radio system procurements would be necessary for a definitive value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the primary risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if the price is competitive. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to market rates for similar systems, it's difficult to definitively assess if this represents excellent value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows one award, but it does not specify the number of bids received. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios. The government likely received multiple proposals, allowing for comparison and selection of the most advantageous offer.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation among defense contractors. This process ensures that the government is not locked into a single supplier, promoting market efficiency and potentially leading to cost savings over the life of the contract.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army personnel who will utilize the SINCGARS radio systems for tactical communications. The contract delivers essential ground and airborne radio systems crucial for battlefield operations. The geographic impact is likely widespread, supporting Army operations globally. This contract supports jobs within the defense manufacturing sector, specifically in radio and wireless communications equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the defense electronics sector, specifically focusing on tactical radio communication systems. The market for such equipment is dominated by a few large defense contractors capable of meeting stringent military specifications. The SINCGARS (Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System) is a well-established family of radios used extensively by the U.S. military and allied forces. Spending in this area is consistent with the ongoing need for secure and reliable battlefield communications.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside factor for this specific contract (ss: false, sb: false). While L3Harris Technologies is a large prime contractor, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The extent of small business subcontracting would depend on L3Harris's internal policies and the specific requirements of the SINCGARS system components. Further analysis would be needed to determine the actual impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army contracting command and program executive offices responsible for tactical communications. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified goods. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-the-army, l3harris-technologies, sincgars, tactical-radio, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, wireless-communications-equipment-manufacturing, radio-and-television-broadcasting, indiana, us-army

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $47.2 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. SINGLE CHANNEL GROUND AND AIRBORNE RADIO SYSTEM (SINCGARS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-12-11. End: 2012-04-30.

What is the historical spending trend for SINCGARS or similar tactical radio systems by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending on SINCGARS and related tactical radio systems by the Department of the Army has been substantial and consistent over the past two decades, reflecting the enduring need for reliable battlefield communications. While the specific $471.9 million award to L3Harris Technologies is a significant single contract, it represents part of a larger, ongoing investment. The Army has historically procured these systems through various contract vehicles, often involving competitive bidding processes to ensure value. Fluctuations in spending can be attributed to modernization efforts, deployment cycles, and evolving technological requirements. Analyzing past contract awards for SINCGARS variants and comparable radio systems would reveal patterns of procurement volume, average contract values, and the primary awardees, providing context for the current award's significance within the broader budgetary landscape for tactical communications.

How does the unit cost of the SINCGARS radios under this contract compare to previous procurements or industry benchmarks?

Determining the precise unit cost for the SINCGARS radios under this $471.9 million contract is challenging without knowing the exact quantity of units procured. The contract data does not explicitly state the number of radio systems being purchased. However, if we assume a typical unit cost for a SINCGARS radio (which can range significantly based on configuration and features, often in the thousands of dollars per unit), we could estimate the quantity. Comparing this estimated unit cost to historical data from previous SINCGARS procurements or publicly available industry benchmarks for similar tactical radios would be crucial. Factors such as technological advancements, inflation, and the competitive landscape at the time of bidding influence unit pricing. A firm fixed-price contract suggests the government secured a set price, but its competitiveness relative to market rates or prior acquisitions requires detailed analysis of the quantity and specific system configurations.

What is L3Harris Technologies' track record with the SINCGARS program and similar defense communication contracts?

L3Harris Technologies, and its predecessor companies, have a significant and established track record with the SINCGARS program and the broader defense communication systems market. L3Harris is a recognized leader in providing advanced communication solutions to military and government customers. Their experience encompasses the development, manufacturing, and sustainment of tactical radio systems, including SINCGARS variants. The company has consistently secured large contracts for communication equipment, demonstrating its capability to meet stringent military requirements and delivery schedules. Their performance history on similar large-scale defense contracts would be a key factor in the Army's decision-making process, suggesting a level of confidence in their ability to execute this $471.9 million award successfully. Past performance evaluations and contract close-out data would provide further insight into their reliability and quality.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Primary risks associated with this $471.9 million SINCGARS contract include potential supply chain disruptions for critical components, technological obsolescence if the system is not updated, and performance issues if the firm fixed-price contract incentivizes shortcuts. Given the firm fixed-price nature, a key risk is that L3Harris Technologies might face cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise, potentially impacting their profitability or willingness to invest in long-term support. Mitigation strategies likely include robust quality assurance and acceptance testing protocols by the Army, clear performance metrics within the contract, and potentially provisions for contract modifications or sustainment support. The government's oversight and the contractor's established reputation also serve as risk mitigation factors, aiming to ensure timely delivery of reliable communication systems.

How does this contract align with the Department of the Army's broader modernization and communication strategy?

This $471.9 million contract for SINCGARS radio systems aligns with the Department of the Army's ongoing strategy to maintain and modernize its tactical communication capabilities. SINCGARS, while a mature system, remains a cornerstone of battlefield communications for many units. This award likely supports the sustainment and potential upgrades of existing SINCGARS fleets, ensuring operational readiness. It complements broader modernization efforts that may include integrating SINCGARS with newer networked systems or preparing for future communication technologies. The Army's strategy typically involves a mix of maintaining legacy systems for interoperability and cost-effectiveness while investing in next-generation capabilities. This contract ensures the continued availability of a proven, reliable communication tool essential for current operations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommunications Equipment ManufacturingRadio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: ITT Corporation (UEI: 001216845)

Address: 1919 W COOK RD, FORT WAYNE, IN, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,196,495

Exercised Options: $47,196,495

Current Obligation: $47,196,495

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W15P7T05DJ101

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-12-11

Current End Date: 2012-04-30

Potential End Date: 2012-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-02-22

More Contracts from L3harris Technologies, Inc.

View all L3harris Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending