DoD awarded $52.4M for aircraft parts and maintenance, with 7 bids received

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $52,421,867 ($52.4M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-09-03

End Date: 2004-09-14

Contract Duration: 377 days

Daily Burn Rate: $139.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200311!000705!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0104 !20030903!20040914!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!24260!051!37!FORT BRAGG !CUMBERLAND !N CAROLINA!+000005478407!N!N!000000000000!J023!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/VEHICLES-TRAILERS-CYCLES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!007!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: ADVANCE, DAVIE County, NORTH CAROLINA, 27006

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $52.4 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200311!000705!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0104 !20030903!20040914!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!24260!051!37!FORT BRAGG !CUMBE… Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in aircraft sustainment. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a healthy market for aircraft parts and repair services. 3. Contract duration of over a year indicates a need for ongoing support. 4. The award falls within the broader category of defense logistics and maintenance. 5. Performance context is tied to the operational readiness of military aircraft. 6. Sector positioning is within the aerospace and defense manufacturing industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $52.4 million for aircraft parts and repair appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for aircraft sustainment would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The 'time and materials' pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. However, with 7 bids received, there was likely competitive pressure to offer fair pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with seven bids received. This indicates a robust competitive environment for the provision of aircraft parts and repair services. The presence of multiple bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Taxpayer Impact: The high level of competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down prices and ensured the government received competitive offers for these critical aircraft sustainment services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force units relying on the supported aircraft for their missions. Services delivered include the maintenance and repair of aircraft, trailers, and cycles, ensuring operational readiness. Geographic impact is centered around Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where the services are likely performed or directly support operations. Workforce implications include employment for skilled technicians and support staff involved in aircraft maintenance and parts supply.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost escalation under Time and Materials contract type if not managed effectively.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical parts and repair could pose supply chain risks.
Ensuring consistent quality of parts and repair services over the contract duration.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive marketplace.
Multiple bidders (7) suggest a healthy level of interest and capability in the market.
Contract supports essential military readiness and operational capabilities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts and maintenance. The market for these services is characterized by specialized manufacturers and service providers catering to military and commercial aviation. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining the operational readiness of military fleets. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for similar aircraft sustainment and parts provisioning across different military branches.

Small Business Impact

There is no explicit indication of small business set-asides for this contract. The presence of a large prime contractor, URS Federal Services Inc., suggests that subcontracting opportunities may exist for small businesses within the aerospace supply chain or specialized repair services. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures would include performance metrics, delivery schedules, and quality standards outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific operational details may be sensitive.

Related Government Programs

Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services
Defense Logistics Support
Aerospace Parts Manufacturing
Military Vehicle Maintenance
Air Force Sustainment Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Supply chain vulnerability for critical aircraft parts.
Contractor performance risk.
Dependence on specific technical expertise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $52.4 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200311!000705!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !N!0104 !20030903!20040914!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!24260!051!37!FORT BRAGG !CUMBERLAND !N CAROLINA!+000005478407!N!N!000000000000!J023!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/VEHICLES-TRAILERS-CYCLES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $52.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-03. End: 2004-09-14.

What is the track record of Lear Siegler Services, Inc. with similar defense contracts?

Lear Siegler Services, Inc. has a history of performing various support services for the Department of Defense, including maintenance, logistics, and base operations. Their experience often spans multiple contract types and military branches. Analyzing their past performance on similar aircraft maintenance and repair contracts, including any reported issues or commendations, would provide insight into their reliability and capability. Specific data on contract awards, performance ratings, and any past disputes or corrective actions would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment of their track record in fulfilling obligations like those in this contract.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or ceiling of the contract?

The provided data indicates an awarded amount of $52,421,866.84. Without the original contract solicitation or award documents, it is difficult to determine the estimated value or ceiling. However, if this represents the total obligated amount, it suggests the government fully utilized the contract's potential. If it's a ceiling, actual spending might be lower. Understanding the contract type (Time and Materials) is key; these often have estimated costs and fixed fees, with the total not to exceed amount being the ceiling. Comparing the awarded amount to similar T&M contracts for aircraft sustainment can indicate if this value is within the expected range for the scope of work.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?

Key performance indicators for a contract of this nature typically revolve around ensuring aircraft readiness and operational availability. These could include metrics such as on-time delivery of parts and completed repairs, adherence to quality standards (e.g., defect rates, rework percentages), turnaround time for maintenance tasks, and compliance with safety regulations. The contract likely specifies acceptable performance levels for these KPIs, with potential incentives for exceeding them or penalties for failing to meet minimum requirements. Regular performance reviews between the contractor and the contracting officer would assess adherence to these KPIs.

What is the historical spending trend for aircraft parts and repair at Fort Bragg or for the supported aircraft type?

Historical spending data for aircraft parts and repair at Fort Bragg or for the specific aircraft type supported by this contract would provide valuable context. Analyzing past contract awards for similar services over several fiscal years can reveal trends in spending, identify fluctuations in demand, and highlight any significant changes in contract values or competition levels. This historical perspective helps in assessing whether the $52.4 million award is consistent with previous investments, indicative of increased needs, or potentially an outlier. Such analysis is crucial for budget planning and identifying potential cost efficiencies over time.

Are there any identified risks associated with the contractor's ability to deliver on this contract?

Risks associated with the contractor's ability to deliver can stem from various factors. For Lear Siegler Services, Inc., potential risks might include financial stability, capacity to handle the workload, supply chain disruptions for critical parts, or past performance issues on similar contracts. The 'Time and Materials' contract type itself introduces a risk of cost overruns if not meticulously managed and monitored by the government. Furthermore, reliance on specific technical expertise or specialized equipment could pose a risk if these resources become unavailable. A thorough risk assessment would involve reviewing the contractor's financial health, operational capacity, and historical performance data.

What is the strategic importance of this contract to the Air Force's overall mission readiness?

This contract is strategically important as it directly supports the operational readiness of Air Force aircraft. Ensuring that aircraft are properly maintained and have access to necessary parts is fundamental to the Air Force's ability to execute its missions, whether they involve combat, transport, or reconnaissance. A delay or failure in providing these services could ground aircraft, impacting deployment capabilities and overall mission effectiveness. Therefore, the reliable and timely execution of this contract is critical for maintaining the Air Force's air power and fulfilling its national security objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline