DoD Awards $55.8M Contract for Systems Engineering Services to Lear Siegler Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $55,838,085 ($55.8M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-07-20
End Date: 2010-07-30
Contract Duration: 1,836 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: R&D
Official Description: 200510!005161!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0097 ! !20050720!20090130!834530086!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !595 SHREWSBURY AVENUE !SHREWSBURY !NJ!07702!19840!025!34!EATONTOWN !MONMOUTH !NEW JERSEY!+000004486929!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!014!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: SHREWSBURY, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07702, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $55.8 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200510!005161!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0097 ! !20050720!20090130!834530086!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !595 SHREWSBURY AVENUE !SHREWSBURY !NJ!07702!19840!025!34!EATONTOWN !MONM… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for systems engineering services, a critical component of defense technology. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. The contract duration of 5 years and 5 months indicates a significant, long-term need. 4. The sector is R&D, specifically focusing on electronics and communication equipment.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $55.8 million over approximately 5.5 years averages to about $10 million annually. Without specific unit cost data or comparable contracts for similar systems engineering services, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the duration suggests a substantial investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for a wide range of potential bidders and can lead to more competitive pricing. The award to Lear Siegler Services, Inc. indicates they were the most advantageous offer.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential defense systems engineering. The competitive nature of the award aims to ensure value for money, but ongoing monitoring is needed to confirm cost-effectiveness.
Public Impact
Supports the development and maintenance of critical defense communication and electronics systems. Ensures technological superiority for the Department of Defense. Contributes to national security by enhancing military operational capabilities. Provides employment opportunities within the defense contracting sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed cost breakdowns makes it hard to assess true value.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term R&D contracts.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical systems engineering.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Supports a vital area of national defense.
- Contractor has a history of service.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on electronics and communication equipment. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining a technological edge in defense. Benchmarks for similar systems engineering contracts are highly variable due to the specialized nature of the work.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The primary contractor, Lear Siegler Services, Inc., is a large entity. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense is responsible for overseeing this contract. Accountability would involve performance reviews, milestone tracking, and financial audits to ensure the contractor meets requirements and stays within budget.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is long, increasing risk of scope creep or changing requirements.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns in R&D projects.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical systems.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, nj, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $55.8 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200510!005161!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0097 ! !20050720!20090130!834530086!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !595 SHREWSBURY AVENUE !SHREWSBURY !NJ!07702!19840!025!34!EATONTOWN !MONMOUTH !NEW JERSEY!+000004486929!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $55.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-07-20. End: 2010-07-30.
How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar systems engineering services in the defense sector?
Determining precise industry benchmarks for specialized systems engineering services is challenging due to the unique requirements of each contract. However, the annual value of approximately $10 million for this contract should be compared against publicly available data for similar DoD contracts, considering factors like scope, complexity, and duration. A detailed cost-volume analysis from the procurement process would offer the best comparison.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success and effectiveness of Lear Siegler Services, Inc. under this contract?
Key performance indicators for systems engineering contracts typically include adherence to project timelines, meeting technical specifications and performance requirements, successful integration of systems, and effective risk management. The Department of Defense would likely have established specific KPIs related to the development and deployment of the electronics and communication equipment, with penalties or incentives tied to performance against these metrics.
What is the potential long-term impact of this contract on the technological capabilities of the Department of Defense?
This contract is intended to enhance the technological capabilities of the DoD by ensuring the effective design, development, and integration of advanced communication and electronics systems. Successful execution could lead to improved operational effectiveness, enhanced situational awareness, and a stronger defense posture. Conversely, underperformance could result in delays or suboptimal technology, potentially impacting readiness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)
Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PKWY STE 300, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20876
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-07-20
Current End Date: 2010-07-30
Potential End Date: 2010-07-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-05-20
More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)