DoD's $14.4M Research & Development Contract Awarded to Lear Siegler Services Inc. for Systems Engineering

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,416,336 ($14.4M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-03-31

End Date: 2007-10-31

Contract Duration: 944 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200507!003456!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0090 ! !20050331!20090130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000005600000!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!014!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SHREWSBURY, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07702, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.4 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200507!003456!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0090 ! !20050331!20090130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONT… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $14.4 million, was awarded to Lear Siegler Services Inc. for systems engineering services. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration was 944 days, with a start date of March 31, 2005, and an end date of October 31, 2007. 4. The primary sector for this spending is Research and Development, specifically in physical, engineering, and life sciences.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.4 million for systems engineering services over approximately 2.5 years appears within a reasonable range for specialized R&D support. However, without specific benchmarks for similar systems engineering contracts within the Department of Defense, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, as the government sought the best value through an open bidding process.

Public Impact

This contract supports the Department of Defense's research and development efforts, potentially leading to advancements in defense technology. The services provided by Lear Siegler Services Inc. are crucial for the development and integration of complex defense systems. The duration of the contract indicates a significant, long-term project requiring specialized engineering expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development sector, specifically NAICS code 541710, which covers R&D in the physical, engineering, and life sciences. Spending in this area is critical for technological advancement but can be subject to long development cycles and evolving requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for R&D contracts. However, the effectiveness of this oversight for this specific contract is not detailed in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, nj, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.4 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200507!003456!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0090 ! !20050331!20090130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000005600000!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-31. End: 2007-10-31.

What specific systems engineering tasks were performed under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of Defense's objectives?

The contract focused on 'SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES' for 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP'. While the exact tasks are not detailed, these services typically involve the design, integration, testing, and lifecycle management of complex electronic and communication systems. The contribution to DoD objectives would likely involve enhancing the capabilities, reliability, and interoperability of defense communication networks and electronic warfare systems, supporting overall mission readiness.

Given the contract's duration and R&D nature, what were the primary risks associated with cost and schedule, and how were they managed?

The primary risks included potential scope creep, unforeseen technical challenges inherent in R&D, and evolving requirements. Management strategies likely involved robust contract clauses for change control, regular technical reviews, and performance monitoring. The 'TIME AND MATERIALS' contract type, while flexible, also carries a risk of cost escalation if not tightly managed through defined labor categories and rates.

How effective was the 'full and open competition' in ensuring the best value for taxpayer dollars on this specific $14.4 million contract?

Full and open competition is generally effective in driving value by fostering a competitive environment. For this $14.4 million contract, it suggests multiple qualified bidders vied for the work, likely leading to a price that reflected market rates for specialized systems engineering. However, 'best value' also encompasses technical merit and past performance, which are not fully detailed here, making a definitive effectiveness judgment challenging without further data.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)

Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PKWY STE 300, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20876

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-03-31

Current End Date: 2007-10-31

Potential End Date: 2007-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-05-20

More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.

View all URS Federal Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending