DoD's $10M Remediation Services Contract Awarded to TETRA TECH EC, INC. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,022,244 ($10.0M)
Contractor: Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-02-13
End Date: 2010-06-30
Contract Duration: 2,329 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO County, CALIFORNIA, 94124
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.0 million to TETRA TECH EC, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $10 million for environmental remediation services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration spans over 6 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The 'CA' award type suggests a Cost-Plus Award Fee contract structure.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar remediation contracts is difficult without more specific cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters price discovery and competitive pricing. However, the CPAF structure allows for costs plus an award fee, which may not always result in the lowest possible price.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for environmental remediation services. While competition is present, the CPAF structure warrants scrutiny to ensure cost efficiency.
Public Impact
Environmental cleanup efforts impacting public health and safety. Long-term contract may indicate ongoing environmental challenges. Potential for job creation in the environmental services sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure can incentivize cost overruns.
- Long contract duration may not reflect current market efficiencies.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Addresses critical environmental remediation needs.
Sector Analysis
The environmental remediation sector is crucial for addressing pollution and restoring damaged ecosystems. Spending in this sector is often driven by regulatory requirements and long-term environmental stewardship goals.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as 'sb' is false. This suggests larger, established firms dominated the bidding process for this particular remediation service.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'DO' award type and the duration of the contract suggest it falls under standard federal procurement oversight. Further review of performance reports and award fee determinations would be necessary to assess accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Long contract duration may not be cost-optimal.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Limited transparency on specific remediation outcomes without further data.
Tags
remediation-services, department-of-defense, ca, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.0 million to TETRA TECH EC, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH EC, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-02-13. End: 2010-06-30.
What specific environmental remediation tasks were performed under this contract, and how did they align with the initial scope and objectives?
The contract focused on remediation services, likely involving the cleanup of hazardous substances or pollutants. A detailed review of task orders, performance reports, and final outcomes would be needed to assess alignment with objectives. This includes verifying that the remediation met regulatory standards and achieved the intended environmental improvements.
How effectively was the Cost Plus Award Fee structure managed to ensure cost control and incentivize optimal performance?
The effectiveness of the CPAF structure hinges on clear performance metrics and rigorous oversight. The government's ability to manage award fees based on TETRA TECH EC, INC.'s performance is critical. Analyzing the award fee determinations and any cost variances would reveal how well the structure controlled costs while driving desired outcomes.
What was the overall environmental impact and taxpayer value derived from this $10 million remediation contract?
The primary value lies in the environmental improvements achieved, such as reduced pollution and restored habitats. Taxpayer value is determined by comparing the cost against the achieved environmental benefits and regulatory compliance. A cost-benefit analysis, considering long-term environmental health and potential future liabilities avoided, would provide a clearer picture of the overall value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc. (UEI: 045224250)
Address: 1230 COLUMBIA ST STE 750, SAN DIEGO, CA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $1,522,517
Exercised Options: $1,522,517
Current Obligation: $10,022,244
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6871198D5713
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-02-13
Current End Date: 2010-06-30
Potential End Date: 2010-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-02-14
More Contracts from Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
- Federal Contract — $238.4M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $83.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200511!001673!5700!fa8903!hsw/Pkv !FA890304D8677 !A!N! !N!0034 ! !20050808!20060131!129280421!128974271!045224250!n!tetra Tech EC, Inc !143 Union Blvd STE 1010 !lakewood !CO!80228!00000! !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000002576213!n!n!000000000000!z111!maint/Office Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !* !562910!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20081231!B! ! !A! !a!u!u!2!003!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $64.3M (Department of Defense)
- Bachelor Enlisted Quarters and Expeditionary Housing — $63.7M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $56.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)