DoD's $13.3M consulting contract awarded to URS Federal Services shows fair value with 6 bidders
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,346,130 ($13.3M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-12-22
End Date: 2010-01-01
Contract Duration: 375 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ACRN MQ - M9545009RC86614
Place of Performance
Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.3 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: ACRN MQ - M9545009RC86614 Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process. 2. Pricing appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar administrative management consulting services. 3. The fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The duration of 375 days suggests a focused scope of work for the services rendered. 5. The contractor, URS Federal Services, has a track record with government contracts. 6. The services fall under administrative management and general management consulting, a common government need.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of approximately $13.3 million for administrative management and general management consulting services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services suggests that the pricing is competitive. The firm fixed-price structure further enhances value by capping the government's financial exposure and incentivizing contractor efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, with six bids received. This level of competition is generally considered healthy and suggests that multiple qualified vendors were interested in providing the services. The presence of six bidders likely contributed to competitive pricing and allowed the Department of the Navy to select the most advantageous offer.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging high-quality service delivery.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, is the primary beneficiary, receiving administrative and management consulting services. The services provided are expected to enhance the operational efficiency and management practices within the Navy. The contract's geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the contractor is located. While not explicitly stated, such consulting services can indirectly impact the federal workforce by improving management structures and processes.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, although the fixed-price nature mitigates financial risk.
- Dependence on contractor expertise for critical management functions.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a fair and transparent process.
- Firm fixed-price contract type reduces financial risk for the government.
- Contractor has experience with federal contracts, suggesting familiarity with government requirements.
- The number of bidders (6) suggests a competitive market for these services.
Sector Analysis
The administrative management and general management consulting services sector is a significant part of the federal contracting landscape, supporting various government functions. This contract fits within the broader category of professional services, which are essential for optimizing government operations. Comparable spending in this sector often involves significant investments in improving efficiency, strategic planning, and organizational effectiveness across different agencies.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract included a small business set-aside, nor is there information suggesting significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The award to URS Federal Services, a large entity, suggests that the primary focus was on obtaining specialized consulting expertise rather than specifically fostering small business participation through this particular contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight. As a firm fixed-price contract, oversight would focus on ensuring the contractor meets the defined scope of work and performance standards. The Department of the Navy's contracting officers are responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific performance details may be internal.
Related Government Programs
- Management and Consulting Services
- Professional Services Contracts
- Department of the Navy Support Contracts
- Federal Administrative Support
Risk Flags
- Potential for contractor performance issues
- Risk of scope creep if not managed diligently
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, virginia, professional-services, contract-value-over-10m
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.3 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.. ACRN MQ - M9545009RC86614
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-12-22. End: 2010-01-01.
What is the track record of URS Federal Services with Department of Defense contracts?
URS Federal Services, now part of AECOM, has a substantial history of performing contracts for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. Their experience spans a wide range of services, including base operations support, environmental services, engineering, and management consulting. For the Department of the Navy specifically, they have been involved in various support roles. Analyzing their past performance on similar-sized contracts can provide insights into their reliability, quality of service, and ability to manage complex projects within budget and schedule. Past performance reviews and contract close-out data, where available, are crucial for assessing their suitability for current and future engagements.
How does the $13.3 million value compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts?
The $13.3 million contract value for administrative management and general management consulting services awarded to URS Federal Services is within a common range for such engagements. Benchmarking this against similar contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy or other DoD components reveals that contracts of this magnitude are typical for projects requiring specialized expertise over a period of approximately one year. Factors influencing value include the complexity of the tasks, the level of expertise required, and the duration. Given that this was a firm fixed-price contract with six bidders, the price achieved is likely competitive for the services rendered, suggesting fair market value.
What are the primary risks associated with this type of consulting contract?
The primary risks associated with this type of administrative management and general management consulting contract include potential scope creep, where the project's objectives expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to increased costs or delays if not managed effectively. Another risk is the contractor's performance not meeting the government's expectations, potentially impacting operational efficiency. However, the firm fixed-price contract structure significantly mitigates financial risk for the government, as the contractor bears the responsibility for cost overruns. The risk of poor performance can be managed through robust oversight, clear performance metrics, and regular progress reviews.
How effective are administrative management consulting services in improving government operations?
Administrative management consulting services can be highly effective in improving government operations when properly scoped, executed, and overseen. These services often focus on optimizing processes, enhancing organizational structures, implementing best practices, and improving resource allocation. For the Department of the Navy, such consulting could lead to streamlined administrative procedures, better decision-making frameworks, and increased overall efficiency. The effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the objectives, the quality of the consultant's recommendations, and the government's commitment to implementing those recommendations. Success is typically measured by improvements in key performance indicators related to efficiency, cost savings, or service delivery.
What is the historical spending trend for administrative management consulting services within the Department of the Navy?
Historical spending trends for administrative management consulting services within the Department of the Navy generally show a consistent demand for such expertise. Agencies like the Navy frequently engage external consultants to address specific management challenges, implement new strategies, or improve the efficiency of complex operations. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on strategic priorities, budget allocations, and the initiation of new programs or reform efforts. Analyzing historical data reveals patterns in the types of services procured, the average contract values, and the primary contractors utilized, providing context for current and future procurement decisions.
What does the 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code (541611) typically encompass?
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services,' encompasses establishments primarily engaged in providing operating advice and assistance on matters of management to other businesses and other organizations. This includes advice on financial management, marketing objectives and policies, human resource management, planning and policy, process and information-flow, and social services program planning and execution. Essentially, firms under this code help organizations improve their performance and efficiency through strategic planning, organizational restructuring, and operational improvements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)
Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PARKWAY, SUITE 300, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20876
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,346,130
Exercised Options: $13,346,130
Current Obligation: $13,346,130
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: M6785402A9011
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-12-22
Current End Date: 2010-01-01
Potential End Date: 2010-01-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-02-09
More Contracts from URS Federal Services, Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)