DoD's $10.5M training support contract awarded to CSRA LLC shows fair value with 28941 bids
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,534,554 ($10.5M)
Contractor: Csra LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-01-08
End Date: 2008-01-07
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $28.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Other
Official Description: TRAINING SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.5 million to CSRA LLC for work described as: TRAINING SUPPORT Key points: 1. The contract demonstrates a commitment to value for money, evidenced by a competitive bidding process. 2. Competition dynamics were robust, with 28941 bids received, suggesting a healthy market. 3. Risk indicators appear low given the established contractor and competitive award. 4. Performance context is within the realm of technical consulting services for defense. 5. Sector positioning is within the broader IT and professional services landscape for government contracts.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of approximately $10.5 million over one year appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar training support services. The high number of bids (28941) suggests that the pricing was competitive and likely aligned with market rates. Without specific per-unit cost data, a direct comparison is difficult, but the overall award value in a highly competitive environment indicates good value for the Department of Defense.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The exceptionally high number of bids received (28941) points to a very active and competitive market for these training support services. This level of competition is ideal for price discovery and ensures the government receives offers from a wide range of potential providers.
Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract likely resulted in a lower price for taxpayers compared to a less competitive procurement. It also suggests that the government had a broad selection of qualified vendors to choose from.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from enhanced training capabilities for its personnel. Services delivered include specialized training support, crucial for operational readiness. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational areas of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, likely supporting personnel nationwide. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled training professionals to be engaged through CSRA LLC.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in if follow-on contracts are not competitively bid.
- Ensuring consistent quality of training across all delivered services.
- Monitoring contractor performance to ensure objectives are met within budget.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential for cost savings.
- High number of bids indicates a robust and responsive market.
- Contract awarded to an established entity (CSRA LLC) with a track record in government contracting.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically focusing on training and technical consulting. The market for government training support is substantial, encompassing various agencies and branches of the military. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale training contracts awarded by the DoD and other federal agencies for similar services, considering factors like duration, scope, and complexity.
Small Business Impact
While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not explicitly mention small business set-asides, the high number of bidders suggests that small businesses may have participated either directly or as subcontractors. The prime contractor, CSRA LLC, would be responsible for managing any subcontracting efforts, and the impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on the extent to which they are integrated into the supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would include performance metrics, delivery schedules, and quality standards outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific operational details may be sensitive.
Related Government Programs
- DoD Training Programs
- Defense Threat Reduction Agency Operations
- Professional and Technical Services Contracts
- Government IT and Consulting Services
Risk Flags
- High number of bids could indicate potential for low-quality offers if not properly vetted.
- Contract duration of one year may limit long-term strategic training development.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a significant training function requires robust performance monitoring.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, training-support, professional-services, consulting, csra-llc, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, virginia, technical-consulting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.5 million to CSRA LLC. TRAINING SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CSRA LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Threat Reduction Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-01-08. End: 2008-01-07.
What is CSRA LLC's track record with the Department of Defense for similar training support contracts?
CSRA LLC, now part of General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT), has a significant history of supporting the Department of Defense across various service areas, including IT, professional services, and training. Prior to its acquisition, CSRA held numerous contracts with DoD components, delivering a wide range of support functions. Analyzing their past performance on similar training support contracts would involve reviewing contract databases for awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or successes. Their established presence suggests a capacity to handle large-scale government contracts, but specific performance metrics for this particular training support award would be key to a full assessment.
How does the value of this $10.5M contract compare to other training support contracts awarded by the DoD in the same period?
Benchmarking this $10.5 million contract requires comparing it to similar training support contracts awarded by the DoD around the 2007-2008 timeframe. Factors such as contract duration (one year in this case), the specific type of training (e.g., technical, leadership, operational), the number of personnel to be trained, and the geographic scope are crucial for a meaningful comparison. Without access to a comprehensive database of all DoD training contracts from that period, a precise comparison is challenging. However, $10.5 million for a one-year, specialized training support contract is within a plausible range for a significant DoD requirement, especially considering the competitive bidding process that likely influenced the final price.
What are the primary risks associated with a "full and open competition" award for training support services?
While full and open competition generally yields the best value, potential risks include the sheer volume of bids making evaluation complex and time-consuming, potentially delaying award. There's also a risk that less experienced but lower-bidding contractors might struggle with performance, leading to quality issues or cost overruns if not managed effectively. For training support, ensuring the contractor maintains up-to-date curriculum, qualified instructors, and adaptable training methodologies in a rapidly evolving defense environment are ongoing risks. The government must maintain robust oversight to mitigate these risks, ensuring the selected contractor consistently meets performance standards and delivers effective training.
How effective was this specific training support contract in achieving its stated objectives for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency?
Assessing the effectiveness of this specific contract requires access to performance reports, end-user feedback, and metrics related to the training outcomes achieved by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). Publicly available data typically focuses on the award itself rather than the granular details of program execution and effectiveness. However, the fact that it was a single delivery order under a larger contract suggests it was a defined task. To evaluate effectiveness, one would look for indicators such as improved mission readiness, enhanced skill proficiency among personnel, successful implementation of new procedures, or cost savings realized through better-trained staff. Without specific DTRA performance reviews or post-contract analysis, a definitive statement on effectiveness cannot be made.
What were the historical spending patterns for training support services by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency prior to this contract?
To understand historical spending patterns for training support by DTRA prior to this $10.5 million contract, one would need to analyze DTRA's budget allocations and contract awards over several preceding fiscal years. This would involve examining procurement data to identify trends in the volume, value, and types of training support services procured. Were they consistently awarding large, multi-year contracts, or relying on smaller, task-order-based procurements? Understanding this context helps determine if this $10.5 million award represented a significant increase, a continuation of existing spending levels, or a shift in procurement strategy. It also helps identify key contractors and the evolution of training needs within DTRA.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation
Address: 6101 STEVENSON AVE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22304
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,534,554
Exercised Options: $10,534,554
Current Obligation: $10,534,554
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DTRA0102D0064
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-01-08
Current End Date: 2008-01-07
Potential End Date: 2008-01-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-11-22
More Contracts from Csra LLC
- . Cecom LRC IS to BE the Provider of Choice for Support of the Worlds Best C4isr Systems, Including Equipment Training, Technical Assistance, and Forward Sustainment Services to the Warfighter — $623.5M (General Services Administration)
- 200505!000083!5700!fa4600!55cons/Cc !FA460004C0010 !a!y!c!y! !p00007!20050101!20050930!169105165!169105165!009581091!n!computer Sciences Corporation !408 Galvin RD N !bellevue !ne!68005!35875!153!31!offutt AFB !sarpy !nebraska !+000001441609!n!n!000000000000!j070!maint & Repair of Eq/Adp Equip & Supplies !S1 !services !000 !* !541512!E! !3! ! !B! ! !20200930!B!F! !A! !a!n!r!2!006!b! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $594.9M (Department of Defense)
- THE Scope of This Task Order IS to Operate, and Maintain the Obim Infrastructure Components and Associated Functionality of the Production and Non-Production Ident Environments and Associated Business Systems Currently Deployed With the DHS Data Centers 1&2. Operations and Maintenance Activities — $487.9M (Department of Homeland Security)
- THE Purpose of This Task Order IS to Procure Datacenters Operational and Maintenance Support Services — $334.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Time and Materials Task for Enterprise Data Architecture Activities and Deliverables — $224.4M (Department of Education)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)