DoD Awards $24.5M for Systems Engineering Services to Lear Siegler Services Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,561,660 ($24.6M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-09-17
End Date: 2010-10-22
Contract Duration: 2,226 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: R&D
Official Description: 200412!008741!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0067 ! !20040917!20070130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000000534855!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!014!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: SHREWSBURY, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07702, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200412!008741!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0067 ! !20040917!20070130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONT… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for systems engineering services, a critical component of defense technology. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of over 7 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The sector is R&D, highlighting investment in technological advancement within the DoD.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $24.5M over 7 years is substantial. Without specific unit cost data or benchmarks for similar systems engineering contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the duration suggests a significant investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and can lead to better price discovery. The specific pricing mechanism (Time and Materials) can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants careful oversight to ensure costs remain controlled.
Public Impact
Supports the Department of Defense's technological development and readiness. Ensures the availability of specialized engineering expertise for critical defense systems. Impacts the defense contracting industry and the companies involved in R&D services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost creep with Time and Materials pricing.
- Long contract duration may not adapt well to rapidly changing technology.
- Limited information on specific performance metrics and oversight.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Awarded to a specific company for specialized services.
- Long-term commitment indicates a sustained need.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on systems engineering for electronics and communication equipment. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining a technological edge in defense.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army. Oversight would typically involve program managers and contracting officers ensuring adherence to contract terms and performance standards. The 'AW' (Award Instrument) code 'DO' suggests a Delivery Order, implying it might be part of a larger indefinite-delivery contract.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials pricing structure.
- Long contract duration.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
- Potential for scope creep without strict oversight.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, nj, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200412!008741!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0067 ! !20040917!20070130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000000534855!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-09-17. End: 2010-10-22.
What specific systems engineering tasks are included in this contract, and how do they align with current defense priorities?
The contract specifies 'SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES' for 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP'. These tasks likely involve the design, integration, testing, and lifecycle management of complex electronic and communication systems crucial for military operations. Alignment with current priorities would depend on the specific technological needs of the Army, such as modernizing communication networks or developing advanced sensor systems.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured to ensure value for money?
The provided data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or the performance measurement methodology. Typically, for systems engineering contracts, KPIs might include on-time delivery of milestones, adherence to technical specifications, successful system integration, and cost control. Effective oversight by the Department of the Army is crucial to monitor these aspects and ensure the contractor delivers value.
How does the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure compare to other contract types for similar R&D services, and what are the associated risks?
Time and Materials (T&M) contracts are often used when the scope of work is not clearly defined or is expected to change. While flexible, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost overruns for the government compared to fixed-price contracts, as the final cost is directly tied to the labor hours and material costs incurred. For R&D services, T&M can be suitable for exploratory phases but requires stringent monitoring of labor hours and rates.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)
Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PKWY STE 300, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20876
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-09-17
Current End Date: 2010-10-22
Potential End Date: 2010-10-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-05-20
More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)