DoD's $16.2M Afghanistan Remediation Services Contract Awarded to Versar, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,231,529 ($16.2M)

Contractor: Versar, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-11-08

End Date: 2009-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,118 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 81

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: TITLE II SERVICES, AFGHANISTAN

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.2 million to VERSAR, INC. for work described as: TITLE II SERVICES, AFGHANISTAN Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Versar, Inc. for remediation services in Afghanistan. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this contract. 3. The contract value is $16.2 million. 4. The contract duration was 1118 days. 5. This falls under the Remediation Services NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded on a Time and Materials basis, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The total award value of $16.2M for 1118 days suggests a moderate daily rate, but without specific unit costs, a precise benchmark is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition suggests efforts to secure competitive pricing, potentially benefiting taxpayers. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants close monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Public Impact

Taxpayers funded $16.2 million for services in Afghanistan. The contract supported environmental remediation efforts. The duration of the contract spanned over three years. Versar, Inc. was the primary contractor for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically remediation. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on environmental needs and geopolitical factors. The $16.2M award is moderate for a multi-year remediation project.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation goals were met.

Oversight & Accountability

The Time and Materials contract type necessitates robust oversight to control costs and ensure the efficient delivery of services. The Department of the Air Force's contracting office managed this award.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

remediation-services, department-of-defense, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.2 million to VERSAR, INC.. TITLE II SERVICES, AFGHANISTAN

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VERSAR, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-11-08. End: 2009-11-30.

What specific remediation activities were performed under this contract, and how did they align with the stated objectives?

The contract focused on remediation services in Afghanistan. While the specific activities are not detailed in the provided data, they likely involved addressing environmental contamination or hazardous materials. The alignment with objectives would depend on the specific mission requirements set forth by the Department of the Air Force and the effectiveness of Versar, Inc.'s execution in meeting those targets.

What were the key risk factors associated with performing remediation services in Afghanistan during the contract period, and how were they mitigated?

Key risks likely included security threats, logistical challenges due to the operating environment, political instability, and potential for unforeseen environmental conditions. Mitigation strategies would have involved close coordination with military and diplomatic personnel, robust security protocols, flexible operational planning, and potentially contingency funds within the Time and Materials structure.

How effectively did Versar, Inc. manage the Time and Materials contract to ensure value for money and prevent cost overruns?

Effectiveness in managing a T&M contract hinges on stringent oversight, clear task definitions, and regular performance reviews by the contracting officer. Without detailed performance reports, it's difficult to definitively assess Versar's effectiveness. However, the contract's completion within its awarded value suggests that cost controls, if implemented, were reasonably successful.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 81

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 45 N E LOOP 410 SUITE 89, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,231,529

Exercised Options: $16,231,529

Current Obligation: $16,231,529

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F4162403D8620

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-11-08

Current End Date: 2009-11-30

Potential End Date: 2009-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-05-06

More Contracts from Versar, Inc.

View all Versar, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending