DoD's $31M Thick Client Seat Contract with CACI NSS Raises Questions on Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,180,756 ($31.2M)

Contractor: CACI NSS, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-04-01

End Date: 2017-03-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $85.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ''IGF::CT::IGF'' THICK CLIENT SEAT - BRONZE SERVICE

Place of Performance

Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33621

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $31.2 million to CACI NSS, LLC for work described as: ''IGF::CT::IGF'' THICK CLIENT SEAT - BRONZE SERVICE Key points: 1. The contract awarded to CACI NSS, LLC for 'THICK CLIENT SEAT - BRONZE SERVICE' represents a significant expenditure of $31.18 million. 2. While awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', the specific nature of 'BRONZE SERVICE' warrants further examination for potential overpricing. 3. The contract's duration of 364 days and firm fixed price structure suggest a defined scope, but the benchmark for 'BRONZE SERVICE' is unclear. 4. The lack of small business participation is noted, despite the contract's size and the sector it falls under (IT Services).

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's value of $31.18 million for 'THICK CLIENT SEAT - BRONZE SERVICE' appears high without clear justification. Benchmarking against similar IT support contracts is difficult due to the specialized service description.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which is a positive indicator for price discovery. However, the specific service description might have limited the pool of truly competitive bids.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for this contract. The value proposition needs to be clearly demonstrated to ensure efficient use of these funds.

Public Impact

Military personnel rely on these 'thick client seats' for operational effectiveness, making service continuity crucial. The IT services sector is highly competitive, and this contract's pricing should reflect market rates for comparable services. Transparency in service definitions and pricing is essential for public trust in government spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically IT services. Spending in this area is substantial across government agencies, with benchmarks varying widely based on service complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The contract did not involve small businesses, as indicated by 'sb': false. This is a missed opportunity for small business engagement, especially in the IT services sector where many small businesses operate.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial to ensure that the 'BRONZE SERVICE' delivered meets the defined requirements and that the pricing remains competitive throughout the contract's life. The Department of Defense and U.S. Special Operations Command are responsible for this oversight.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-computer-related-services, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $31.2 million to CACI NSS, LLC. ''IGF::CT::IGF'' THICK CLIENT SEAT - BRONZE SERVICE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI NSS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-04-01. End: 2017-03-31.

What specific services constitute 'BRONZE SERVICE' for thick client seats, and how does this definition justify the $31.18 million cost?

The term 'BRONZE SERVICE' is not a standard industry term and lacks a clear, universally understood definition. Without detailed specifications from the contract documents, it's impossible to ascertain the exact services provided. This ambiguity makes it difficult to assess if the $31.18 million expenditure represents fair value for money. Further clarification from the contracting agency is needed to understand the scope and deliverables associated with this service tier.

Given the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' award, what factors might have limited the number or competitiveness of bids for this contract?

While the contract was advertised as 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' the specialized nature of 'THICK CLIENT SEAT - BRONZE SERVICE' might have deterred some potential bidders. If the technical requirements or service level agreements were highly specific or proprietary, only a limited number of companies with particular expertise or existing relationships might have been able to effectively compete. This could lead to less aggressive pricing than a broader, less specialized IT service contract.

How does the $31.18 million expenditure for one year of 'BRONZE SERVICE' compare to industry benchmarks for similar IT support contracts, and what is the potential taxpayer impact?

Directly comparing this $31.18 million expenditure for one year of 'BRONZE SERVICE' to industry benchmarks is challenging due to the vague service description. However, for a single year of IT support, this amount appears substantial. If the services provided are standard IT maintenance and support, taxpayers could be overpaying. The potential taxpayer impact is significant, as inefficient spending on IT services can divert funds from other critical government functions or necessitate higher tax revenues.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: H9222210R0034

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 11955 FREEDOM DR STE 12000, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,449,012

Exercised Options: $31,449,012

Current Obligation: $31,180,756

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9222211D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-04-01

Current End Date: 2017-03-31

Potential End Date: 2017-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-04-12

More Contracts from CACI NSS, LLC

View all CACI NSS, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending