HHS awards $41.9M for Medical & Surgical Instruments, Equipment & Supplies to Cotiviti Gov Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $41,961,460 ($42.0M)

Contractor: Cotiviti GOV Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2002-12-20

End Date: 2011-10-01

Contract Duration: 3,207 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: MED & SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS,EQ & SUP

Place of Performance

Location: OMAHA, DOUGLAS County, NEBRASKA, 68164

State: Nebraska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $42.0 million to COTIVITI GOV SERVICES, LLC for work described as: MED & SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS,EQ & SUP Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Medical & Surgical Instruments, Equipment & Supplies. 2. Cotiviti Gov Services, LLC is the contractor. 3. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is the agency. 4. Full and open competition was used. 5. Contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded using a Cost Plus Award Fee structure, which can incentivize performance but may lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. The award amount of $41.9M over its duration needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts for specific medical and surgical items.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for soliciting bids and ensuring fair market pricing. However, the Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally positive for taxpayer value. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure, however, necessitates diligent oversight to prevent cost overruns and ensure funds are used effectively.

Public Impact

Ensures availability of essential medical and surgical instruments and supplies for federal health programs. Supports healthcare delivery by providing necessary equipment and services. The contract's performance impacts the operational capacity of agencies like CMS. Competition ensures a range of potential providers could bid, potentially leading to better value.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The procurement falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services, often supporting the acquisition and management of specialized goods and services. Spending in this category can vary widely depending on agency needs, but consistent competition is key to managing costs effectively.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or subcontracted.

Oversight & Accountability

The Cost Plus Award Fee contract type necessitates robust oversight from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to ensure performance objectives are met and costs are controlled. Regular audits and performance reviews are crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-health-and-human-services, ne, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $42.0 million to COTIVITI GOV SERVICES, LLC. MED & SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS,EQ & SUP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COTIVITI GOV SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $42.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-12-20. End: 2011-10-01.

What specific types of medical and surgical instruments and equipment were procured under this contract, and how do their unit costs compare to market rates?

The provided data lacks specificity regarding the exact medical and surgical instruments and equipment. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of procured items and their unit costs is required. Benchmarking these against General Services Administration (GSA) schedules, other federal contracts, or commercial price lists would reveal if the pricing was competitive and offered good value to taxpayers.

What were the key performance metrics and award fee criteria used in this Cost Plus Award Fee contract, and how effectively were they monitored?

The specific performance metrics and award fee criteria are not detailed in the provided data. Effective monitoring of these criteria by HHS/CMS is crucial for a Cost Plus Award Fee contract. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the contractor was appropriately incentivized and if taxpayer funds were used efficiently to achieve desired outcomes.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best possible price and quality for these medical and surgical supplies?

A full and open competition theoretically allows all responsible sources to submit offers, fostering a competitive environment that should drive down prices and improve quality. The effectiveness of this process depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the rigor of the negotiation. Without access to the solicitation and evaluation details, it's presumed the process aimed for optimal value, but the Cost Plus Award Fee structure still requires diligent management.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL/DENTAL/VETERINARY EQPT/SUPP

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: HMS Holdings Corp. (UEI: 129077280)

Address: 2121 N 117TH AVE # 200, OMAHA, NE, 02

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $41,961,460

Exercised Options: $41,961,460

Current Obligation: $41,961,460

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 500990021

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2002-12-20

Current End Date: 2011-10-01

Potential End Date: 2011-10-01 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-06-26

More Contracts from Cotiviti GOV Services, LLC

View all Cotiviti GOV Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending