DoD Awards $62.4M for Missile Defense R&D to Mevatec Corp, Amidst Concerns of Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $62,445,902 ($62.4M)

Contractor: BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-05-02

End Date: 2024-01-26

Contract Duration: 7,939 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200208!001696!2100!SG60 !USA SPACE AND STRATEGIC DEF CDR !DASG6002D0009 !A!N! !Y!0044 !20020502!20050423!130106867!130106867!130106867!N!MEVATEC CORPORATION !1525 PERIMETER PARKWAY, SU!HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000860000!N!N!000000000000!AC23!RDTE/MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS-ADV TECH DEV !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !1CAA!BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYS !541710!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!007!K! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!B!Y!N! ! !Z! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: HAUPPAUGE, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11788

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $62.4 million to BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200208!001696!2100!SG60 !USA SPACE AND STRATEGIC DEF CDR !DASG6002D0009 !A!N! !Y!0044 !20020502!20050423!130106867!130106867!130106867!N!MEVATEC CORPORATION !1525 PERIMETER PARKWAY, SU!HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADIS… Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $62.4M awarded for advanced missile and space systems R&D. 2. Competition was limited, raising questions about price discovery and potential taxpayer impact. 3. The contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically missile defense systems. 4. Potential concerns regarding the effectiveness of the competition method and overall value for money.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $62.4M for R&D in missile and space systems appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific details on the scope of work, but the limited competition raises concerns about whether this price represents optimal value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a limited competitive process. This method can restrict the pool of potential bidders, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation compared to full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition raises concerns about taxpayer impact, as it may not have secured the best possible price or value for the services rendered.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to restricted competition in a critical defense sector. The focus on advanced missile defense highlights the importance of efficient spending in national security. Lack of transparency in the procurement process could hinder public trust in defense spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract is within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on advanced technology development for missile and space systems. Spending in this area is critical for national security but requires careful oversight to ensure efficiency and value.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract award, either as prime contractors or significant subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities for small business participation were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense through the Defense Contract Management Agency. Oversight is crucial given the significant value and the limited competition, to ensure the contractor meets performance requirements and delivers value for taxpayer money.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, ny, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $62.4 million to BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC.. 200208!001696!2100!SG60 !USA SPACE AND STRATEGIC DEF CDR !DASG6002D0009 !A!N! !Y!0044 !20020502!20050423!130106867!130106867!130106867!N!MEVATEC CORPORATION !1525 PERIMETER PARKWAY, SU!HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000860000!N!N!000000000000!AC23!RDTE/MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS-ADV TECH DEV !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !1CAA!BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYS !541710!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $62.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-05-02. End: 2024-01-26.

What specific technological advancements are being pursued under this contract, and how do they align with current defense priorities?

The contract specifies 'RDTE/MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS-ADV TECH DEV' and 'BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYS.' This suggests a focus on developing cutting-edge technologies for missile defense, likely aimed at countering emerging threats and maintaining strategic superiority. The alignment with defense priorities would depend on the specific threat assessments and strategic goals of the Department of Defense at the time of award.

What were the justifications for excluding other potential sources, and how was the pricing validated under this limited competition?

The justification for 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' needs detailed examination. Typically, this requires demonstrating that only specific sources can meet the requirement. Pricing validation under such conditions is critical; the agency should have employed robust cost analysis techniques to ensure the negotiated price was fair and reasonable, despite the limited bidder pool.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure effectiveness and value for money?

Key performance indicators for R&D contracts often relate to milestones, technical performance metrics, and successful prototype development. The effectiveness and value for money will be assessed by tracking the contractor's progress against these KPIs, ensuring that the developed technologies meet the intended performance specifications and contribute to the overall mission objectives of the missile defense program.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: BAE Systems PLC

Address: 308 VOYAGER WAY, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DASG6002D0009

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2002-05-02

Current End Date: 2024-01-26

Potential End Date: 2024-01-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-01-26

More Contracts from BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.

View all BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending