DoD Awards $56.9M Contract for Vehicle Maintenance to Lear Siegler Services Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $56,887,475 ($56.9M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-01-17
End Date: 2005-04-28
Contract Duration: 832 days
Daily Burn Rate: $68.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200307!000411!2100!BK01 !ACA, SOUTH REGION CONTRACTING CT!DAKF1199D0012 !A!N! !N!0032 !20030117!20030311!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31068!029!13!FORT STEWART !BRYAN !GEORGIA !+000000300000!N!N!000000000000!J023!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/VEHICLES-TRAILERS-CYCLES !S1 !SERVICES !1DBV!BRADLEY,INFANTRY FT VEH FAMILY!811118!E! !5!B!M! !A!A!20030311!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!010!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: GEORGIA, 30330, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $56.9 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200307!000411!2100!BK01 !ACA, SOUTH REGION CONTRACTING CT!DAKF1199D0012 !A!N! !N!0032 !20030117!20030311!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31068!029!13!FORT STEWART !BRYAN… Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $56.9 million, indicating a significant need for maintenance services. 2. URS Federal Services Inc. was a competitor, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can carry cost overrun risks. 4. The sector is primarily Defense, specifically vehicle and equipment maintenance.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $56.9 million for maintenance and repair of vehicles and equipment appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale maintenance contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government. The presence of URS Federal Services Inc. as a competitor further supports this.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is expected to yield a fair price, maximizing taxpayer value for the essential maintenance services provided.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness of Army vehicles and equipment. Supports military personnel and operations in the South Region. Creates and sustains jobs within the defense contracting sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize contractor to increase costs.
- Contract duration of 832 days (approx. 2.3 years) may not fully capture long-term needs.
- Potential for scope creep in maintenance and repair services.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Contractor has experience in similar services.
- Supports critical military equipment readiness.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on the maintenance and repair of vehicles, trailers, and cycles. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and operational capability.
Small Business Impact
There is no explicit indication of small business participation in this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure requires diligent monitoring to ensure costs remain reasonable and within scope.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
- Potential for cost overruns.
- Contract duration may not cover all future needs.
- Lack of explicit small business participation noted.
Tags
department-of-defense, ga, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $56.9 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200307!000411!2100!BK01 !ACA, SOUTH REGION CONTRACTING CT!DAKF1199D0012 !A!N! !N!0032 !20030117!20030311!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31068!029!13!FORT STEWART !BRYAN !GEORGIA !+000000300000!N!N!000000000000!J023!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/VEHICLES-TRAILERS-CYCLES !S1 !SERVICES !1DBV!BRADLEY,INFANTRY FT VEH FAMILY!811118!E! !5!B!M! !A!A!20030311!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $56.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-01-17. End: 2005-04-28.
What is the typical profit margin for Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts in the defense maintenance sector?
Profit margins for Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts in the defense maintenance sector can vary significantly based on contract complexity, risk, and market conditions. Generally, the fixed fee is negotiated as a percentage of the estimated cost. While specific figures are proprietary, industry averages often see fees ranging from 5% to 15% of the estimated cost. However, this is a broad range, and actual profit realization depends heavily on the contractor's ability to manage costs effectively within the negotiated parameters.
How does the competition level impact the final price for vehicle maintenance contracts?
Full and open competition typically drives down prices by encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best value propositions. When several qualified companies compete, they are incentivized to be more cost-effective and innovative to win the contract. This contrasts with limited or sole-source procurements, where reduced competition can lead to higher prices as the contractor faces less pressure to optimize costs. Therefore, the 'full and open' designation suggests a more competitive price discovery process.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of this vehicle maintenance contract?
Key performance indicators for such a contract would likely include metrics like vehicle availability rates, turnaround time for repairs, quality of workmanship (e.g., defect rates), adherence to maintenance schedules, and cost control against the fixed fee. Performance would also be assessed against delivery timelines for parts and services. The government would monitor these KPIs to ensure the contractor meets operational readiness requirements and provides value for the funds expended.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)
Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 21401
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-01-17
Current End Date: 2005-04-28
Potential End Date: 2005-04-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-08-12
More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)