DoD Awards $17.5M IT Contract to SETA Corporation for Telecommunication Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,706,438 ($13.7M)

Contractor: Apptis, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-05-14

End Date: 2012-02-13

Contract Duration: 2,831 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200409!001815!9700!HC1013!DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20002D5000 !A!N! !N!0029 ! !20040514!20050513!175320761!175320761!175320761!N!SETA CORPORATION !6862 ELM STREET, 6TH FLOOR!MCLEAN !VA!22101!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000001930094!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !519190!E! !5!B!S! ! !C!20040930!B!F!N!A! !A!U!Y!2!006!K! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!A! ! ! !C!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! !HC1046!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FALLS CHURCH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22040

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.7 million to APPTIS, INC. for work described as: 200409!001815!9700!HC1013!DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20002D5000 !A!N! !N!0029 ! !20040514!20050513!175320761!175320761!175320761!N!SETA CORPORATION !6862 ELM STREET, 6TH FLOOR!MCLEAN !VA!22101!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to SETA Corporation for IT and telecommunication services. 2. The contract value is $17,532,076.10, with a period of performance from May 14, 2004, to May 13, 2005. 3. The procurement was conducted under Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 4. The primary sector is Information Technology, with a specific focus on telecommunications. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense via the Defense Information Systems Agency.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $17.5 million appears reasonable for IT and telecommunication services. However, without specific service details or comparable contract data, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources, indicating a competitive process. This method generally promotes price discovery and ensures fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds are being used efficiently, though the exact savings compared to other methods are not quantifiable from this data.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation of critical defense information technology and telecommunication systems. Supports the Department of Defense's mission by providing necessary technical services. Potential for technological advancements and service improvements through contracted expertise. Impacts the IT services market by awarding a significant contract to a specific vendor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT and telecommunications sector, specifically related to wired telecommunications carriers. Spending in this area is crucial for government operations, with benchmarks varying widely based on service complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract award. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the Defense Information Systems Agency, a component of the Department of Defense, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of this oversight for this specific contract is not detailed.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

wired-telecommunications-carriers, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.7 million to APPTIS, INC.. 200409!001815!9700!HC1013!DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20002D5000 !A!N! !N!0029 ! !20040514!20050513!175320761!175320761!175320761!N!SETA CORPORATION !6862 ELM STREET, 6TH FLOOR!MCLEAN !VA!22101!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000001930094!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !519190!E! !5!B!S! ! !C!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is APPTIS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-05-14. End: 2012-02-13.

What specific telecommunication services were provided under this contract, and how did they align with the Defense Information Systems Agency's evolving needs?

The provided data classifies the service under 'OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES' (D399) and 'Wired Telecommunications Carriers' (517110). Without a detailed statement of work, it's difficult to ascertain the precise services. These likely included network infrastructure, communication lines, and related support critical for DISA's operations during that period.

Given the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, what measures were in place to control costs and prevent overruns, especially considering the $17.5 million value?

Time and Materials contracts inherently carry a risk of cost escalation. Effective oversight would involve rigorous monitoring of labor hours, rates, and material costs, along with clear task orders and performance metrics to ensure the contractor's efforts were efficient and aligned with project goals.

How did the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' process ensure optimal value and prevent potential vendor lock-in for these essential telecommunication services?

This procurement method implies that while the competition was open, certain sources were excluded, possibly due to specific qualifications or existing relationships. The 'full and open' aspect suggests multiple bidders were considered, promoting competition. However, the exclusion criteria would need scrutiny to ensure it didn't unduly limit the competitive pool.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationWired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite)Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 4800 WESTFIELDS BLVD STE 1, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DCA20002D5000

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-05-14

Current End Date: 2012-02-13

Potential End Date: 2012-02-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-09-11

More Contracts from Apptis, Inc.

View all Apptis, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending