DoD's $812M Bradley Reset Long Lead Material Contract Awarded to BAE Systems

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $812,563,032 ($812.6M)

Contractor: BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-11-29

End Date: 2013-06-28

Contract Duration: 2,038 days

Daily Burn Rate: $398.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FY09 BRADLEY RESET LONG LEAD MATERIAL

Place of Performance

Location: YORK, YORK County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17408

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $812.6 million to BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P. for work described as: FY09 BRADLEY RESET LONG LEAD MATERIAL Key points: 1. Significant investment in armored vehicle readiness. 2. Sole-source award to BAE Systems raises questions about competition. 3. Long contract duration (2038) suggests ongoing program needs. 4. High value indicates critical component importance.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's total value is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the pricing reflects fair market value or if taxpayers are receiving optimal value for this long-lead material.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to BAE Systems. This lack of competition limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for such a large contract may result in taxpayers paying a premium for the Bradley reset long lead material.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operational readiness of Bradley Fighting Vehicles. Supports critical defense manufacturing capabilities. Potential for cost overruns due to lack of competitive pressure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to military vehicle manufacturing and sustainment. Spending benchmarks for similar long-lead material procurements for armored vehicles can vary widely based on technological complexity and production volume.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for sole-source contracts of this magnitude to ensure cost reasonableness and prevent potential waste. The long duration necessitates continuous monitoring of performance and pricing.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

military-armored-vehicle-tank-and-tank-c, department-of-defense, pa, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $812.6 million to BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.. FY09 BRADLEY RESET LONG LEAD MATERIAL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $812.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-11-29. End: 2013-06-28.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure price reasonableness?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs where only one source can fulfill the requirement. To ensure price reasonableness, the government should have conducted a thorough cost analysis, reviewed historical pricing, and potentially engaged in negotiation with the sole provider.

What are the specific risks associated with the long duration of this contract extending to 2038?

The primary risks include potential obsolescence of technology, significant price fluctuations over time, and the government's reduced flexibility to adapt to changing military requirements or explore more cost-effective alternatives. Maintaining oversight and incorporating price adjustment clauses are critical.

How does the 'COST NO FEE' contract type impact the government's ability to control costs and ensure contractor performance?

'COST NO FEE' contracts are generally used when the final cost is uncertain. While it covers all allowable costs, it offers minimal incentive for the contractor to control costs, as they are reimbursed regardless. This places a heavy burden on the government to meticulously track and audit costs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Transportation Equipment ManufacturingMilitary Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: BAE Systems PLC

Address: 1100 BAIRS RD, YORK, PA, 17408

Business Categories: Category Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $812,563,032

Exercised Options: $812,563,032

Current Obligation: $812,563,032

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W56HZV05G0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-11-29

Current End Date: 2013-06-28

Potential End Date: 2013-06-28 12:06:00

Last Modified: 2022-09-15

More Contracts from BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.

View all BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending