Army awards $15.4M contract for systems engineering services to Lear Siegler Services Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,419,005 ($15.4M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-12-05

End Date: 2005-04-06

Contract Duration: 488 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200403!001192!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0026 ! !20031205!20070130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000014774952!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!014!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SHREWSBURY, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07702, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.4 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200403!001192!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0026 ! !20031205!20070130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONT… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for systems engineering services, a critical component of defense technology development. 2. The contract was competed fully and openly, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (488 days) indicates a medium-term project. 4. The award amount of $15.4 million falls within a moderate spending range for specialized engineering services. 5. The contractor, Lear Siegler Services Inc., has a history of performing government contracts. 6. The contract falls under the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $15.4 million for systems engineering services over approximately 1.6 years appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized technical support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for systems engineering within the Department of Defense is challenging without more granular data on the specific services rendered. However, the duration and total value suggest a moderate investment for the scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 14 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A competitive environment generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A fully competed contract like this one is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at a competitive market price, preventing potential overspending.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from specialized systems engineering expertise to support its technological advancements. Services delivered likely involve the design, integration, and testing of complex electronic and communication equipment. The geographic impact is centered around the contractor's location in Gaithersburg, Maryland, and the Army's operational needs. The contract supports a workforce skilled in systems engineering and related technical fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically NAICS code 541710 (Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences). This sector is crucial for innovation and technological advancement within the defense industry. Spending in this area often supports the development of next-generation military capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks for systems engineering services within the DoD can vary widely based on project complexity and duration, but this $15.4 million award represents a significant investment in specialized expertise.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited for this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor has a history of subcontracting with small businesses on other projects.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are usually embedded in the contract's performance work statement and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply if fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, systems-engineering, r&d, electronics-and-communication-equipment, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, medium-contract-value, lear-siegler-services-inc, gaithersburg-maryland

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.4 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200403!001192!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB010 !A!N! !Y!0026 ! !20031205!20070130!073871048!065262573!043271568!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!31175!031!24!GAITHERSBURG !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000014774952!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-12-05. End: 2005-04-06.

What is the track record of Lear Siegler Services Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Lear Siegler Services Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts. While the provided data snippet focuses on a single award, a comprehensive review would involve examining their contract history across various agencies and contract types. This includes analyzing past performance evaluations, any documented disputes or terminations, and their success rate in competitive bidding. Understanding their experience with similar systems engineering or defense-related projects is crucial for assessing their capability and reliability for this specific contract. Their presence in the government contracting space suggests they possess the necessary infrastructure and expertise to manage federal awards.

How does the $15.4 million award compare to typical spending for similar systems engineering services within the Department of the Army?

Comparing the $15.4 million award requires context regarding the specific scope and duration of the systems engineering services. Contracts for systems engineering can range significantly, from smaller, focused support tasks to large-scale, multi-year programs. Given this contract's duration of approximately 1.6 years (488 days), the average annual value is around $9.6 million. This figure falls within a moderate range for specialized technical services. However, without detailed information on the deliverables, complexity, and specific technologies involved, a precise benchmark against other Army contracts is difficult. Factors like the level of security clearance required, the criticality of the systems supported, and the specific engineering disciplines involved heavily influence pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks for this systems engineering contract could include technical challenges in integrating complex electronic and communication equipment, potential schedule delays, and cost overruns if not managed effectively. The broad nature of 'systems engineering services' also presents a risk of scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and controlled. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust project management by the Army, detailed performance metrics within the contract, regular progress reviews, and potentially phased funding tied to milestones. The contractor's experience and the competitive bidding process also serve as risk-reduction factors, suggesting a capable provider was selected.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for money for this specific contract?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money in federal contracting. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. With 14 bids received for this contract, the competition level appears robust, suggesting that the Army received a range of proposals and pricing options. This increases the likelihood that the selected offer, Lear Siegler Services Inc., provided a competitive price relative to the proposed technical solution and performance capabilities. The government's evaluation criteria, applied rigorously, would further ensure that the best value was obtained.

What are the historical spending patterns for systems engineering services within the Department of the Army, and how does this contract fit?

Historical spending on systems engineering services within the Department of the Army is substantial, reflecting the complexity and technological demands of modern military operations. The Army consistently invests in R&D and engineering support to maintain its technological edge. This $15.4 million contract represents a specific investment within that broader spending pattern, likely focused on a particular program or set of systems related to electronics and communication equipment. Analyzing historical data would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured. This contract appears to be a typical, medium-sized award for specialized engineering support within the R&D category.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)

Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PKWY STE 300, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20876

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-12-05

Current End Date: 2005-04-06

Potential End Date: 2005-04-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-05-20

More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.

View all URS Federal Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending