HHS awards $39.3M contract to Tulane for research, raising questions on value and competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $39,302,813 ($39.3M)
Contractor: THE Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 1999-06-01
End Date: 2013-08-15
Contract Duration: 5,189 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: R&D
Place of Performance
Location: JACKSON, HINDS County, MISSISSIPPI, 39217
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $39.3 million to THE ADMINISTRATORS OF TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant award value of $39.3M for research services. 2. Competition method is 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', but details on its effectiveness are limited. 3. Contract duration of 5189 days (over 14 years) suggests long-term commitment. 4. No indication of small business participation. 5. Sector is primarily R&D within Healthcare.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $39.3M over a 14-year period is substantial. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, assessing the value for money is difficult. Benchmarking against similar research contracts is challenging due to the specialized nature of R&D.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION'. However, the lack of detailed information on the bidding process and the number of bidders makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of price discovery and whether the best value was achieved.
Taxpayer Impact: The substantial award amount suggests a significant taxpayer investment. Ensuring this investment yields valuable research outcomes is crucial for justifying the expenditure.
Public Impact
Taxpayers are funding extensive research over a long contract period. Potential for groundbreaking discoveries in health research. Transparency in the award and execution of this large research contract is important for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration may indicate potential for cost overruns or scope creep.
- Lack of small business participation limits opportunities for smaller innovative firms.
- Limited information on performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad search for qualified contractors.
- Contract supports critical health research initiatives.
- The Administrator of Tulane Educational Fund is a reputable institution.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on health-related research. The award amount of $39.3M is significant for a single research contract, though benchmarks vary widely based on the specific research area and scope.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was awarded to a large institution, potentially missing opportunities to engage smaller, specialized research firms.
Oversight & Accountability
The long duration of the contract necessitates robust oversight from the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure milestones are met, funds are used appropriately, and the research remains aligned with program objectives. Regular performance reviews are critical.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
- National Institutes of Health Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
- Long contract duration may limit adaptability to changing research needs.
- No small business participation noted.
- Limited transparency on the competitive process beyond the award type.
Tags
department-of-health-and-human-services, ms, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $39.3 million to THE ADMINISTRATORS OF TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE ADMINISTRATORS OF TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (National Institutes of Health).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $39.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1999-06-01. End: 2013-08-15.
What specific research outcomes or deliverables are expected from this $39.3M contract, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure value for taxpayer money?
The contract details do not specify the exact research outcomes or deliverables. To ensure value, the Department of Health and Human Services should have established clear, measurable milestones and performance metrics tied to the research objectives. Regular progress reports and independent evaluations would be crucial for tracking the achievement of these outcomes and justifying the significant taxpayer investment over the contract's extended period.
Given the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' award type, what was the competitive landscape, and how did the agency ensure the selected contractor provided the best value?
While the award type indicates a broad solicitation, the specific details of the competitive landscape (e.g., number of bidders, evaluation criteria, and the basis for selecting Tulane) are not provided. To ensure best value, the agency should have conducted a thorough evaluation of technical proposals, past performance, and cost, selecting the offer that represented the optimal balance of these factors, not necessarily the lowest price.
How does the 14-year duration of this contract impact the agency's ability to adapt to evolving research needs and technological advancements in the health sector?
A contract duration of 5189 days (over 14 years) presents a significant challenge in adapting to rapidly evolving research needs and technologies. While long-term contracts can provide stability for complex, multi-year research, they risk locking the government into potentially outdated approaches. The contract should include provisions for periodic reviews, scope adjustments, or termination clauses to allow for flexibility and incorporation of new scientific developments.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6823 SAINT CHARLES AVE, NEW ORLEANS, LA, 70118
Business Categories: Category Business, Educational Institution, Higher Education, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $335,812,289
Exercised Options: $189,937,046
Current Obligation: $39,302,813
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 1999-06-01
Current End Date: 2013-08-15
Potential End Date: 2013-08-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-03-13
More Contracts from THE Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund
- B Cell Epitope Research — $18.7M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Novel Mucosal Vaccine Approaches for Pneumonia — $6.6M (Department of Health and Human Services)
View all THE Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund federal contracts →
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →