DoD's $17.8M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. in 2009
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,876,504 ($17.9M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-21
End Date: 2010-09-28
Contract Duration: 372 days
Daily Burn Rate: $48.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: ACRN DE - M6785409RCDEH80
Place of Performance
Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.9 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: ACRN DE - M6785409RCDEH80 Key points: 1. Contract awarded under firm-fixed-price terms, indicating clear cost expectations. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 372 days implies a focused scope of work. 4. Awarded by the Department of the Navy, aligning with defense sector needs. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to engineering services. 6. Virginia is listed as the contractor's state, a common hub for defense contractors.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed service descriptions and market data from 2009. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to control costs, but the total award amount of $17.8 million for engineering services over approximately one year needs to be compared against similar, contemporaneous contracts for specific defense engineering tasks. Without further context on the complexity and deliverables, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding environment, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially more competitive pricing for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the designation implies a market where multiple firms could have realistically competed for this work.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs and ensuring the government receives services at a fair market price.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential engineering services. The services delivered likely supported naval operations, infrastructure, or platform development. The geographic impact is primarily within the defense sector, potentially supporting bases or projects managed by the Navy. Workforce implications would include employment for engineers and technical staff at Amentum Technology, Inc.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it hard to gauge effectiveness.
- Limited data on the precise nature of engineering services provided.
- Contract value is significant, requiring careful oversight to ensure efficiency.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract helps manage cost certainty.
- Full and open competition suggests a healthy market engagement.
- Awarded to a single entity, implying a clear line of responsibility.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. The defense industry relies heavily on specialized engineering firms for design, development, testing, and sustainment of complex systems and infrastructure. The market for defense engineering services is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually. This contract represents a portion of that spending, likely supporting specific naval requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, small businesses were likely not the primary recipients of this prime contract. However, depending on the subcontracting plans and requirements, there may have been opportunities for small businesses to participate indirectly as subcontractors to Amentum Technology, Inc. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Navy contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Contracts
- Department of Defense Engineering Support Services
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts
- Firm Fixed Price Defense Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not tightly managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical engineering functions.
- Need for robust quality assurance to ensure technical accuracy.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, engineering-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, naics-541330, virginia, contract-award, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.9 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. ACRN DE - M6785409RCDEH80
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-21. End: 2010-09-28.
What was the specific nature of the engineering services provided under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 541330, which is 'Engineering Services.' However, the specific nature of these services for this particular contract (ACRN DE - M6785409RCDEH80) is not detailed. Typically, engineering services for the Department of the Navy could encompass a wide range of activities, including but not limited to: systems engineering, design and development of naval platforms or components, technical analysis, research and development support, cybersecurity engineering, or infrastructure engineering for naval facilities. Without access to the contract's statement of work (SOW) or task orders, the precise deliverables remain unspecified.
How does the $17.8 million award compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy around 2009?
Comparing the $17.8 million award requires context regarding the scope and duration. For a contract awarded in late 2009 with an end date in late 2010 (approximately one year), this amount is substantial but not extraordinary for specialized defense engineering services. Similar contracts could range from a few million to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on whether they involved large-scale platform development, sustainment engineering, or specialized R&D. To provide a precise benchmark, one would need to identify comparable contracts for similar engineering disciplines (e.g., naval architecture, systems engineering for combat systems) awarded within the same timeframe and by the same or similar agencies, adjusting for inflation and scope.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?
The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this contract. Typically, these would be outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or associated Task Orders. For engineering services, KPIs might include adherence to design specifications, timely completion of technical reviews, successful system integration, accuracy of analyses, or compliance with safety and quality standards. Deliverables could range from design documents, technical reports, prototypes, test results, or recommendations for system improvements. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the government had a clear expectation of the scope and cost, implying defined deliverables were part of the agreement.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly for engineering services?
Amentum Technology, Inc. (and its predecessors/related entities) has a significant history of contracting with the Department of Defense. While this specific contract dates back to 2009, the company has consistently been a major player in providing a wide array of services to the DoD, including engineering, technical support, logistics, and facility management. Their track record generally involves large, complex contracts across various military branches. A comprehensive review would involve examining their performance history on other DoD contracts, including any past performance evaluations, awards, or disputes, to assess their reliability and expertise in delivering engineering solutions.
Were there any notable risks or challenges associated with this contract or similar engineering services contracts in the defense sector during that period?
Engineering services contracts, especially within the defense sector, often carry inherent risks. For a contract like this from 2009, potential risks could include technical challenges in meeting complex requirements, schedule delays due to unforeseen technical hurdles or integration issues, cost overruns if the fixed-price nature didn't adequately account for all variables (though less likely with FFP), and contractor performance issues. Cybersecurity risks related to handling sensitive defense data would also be a concern. Furthermore, shifts in defense priorities or budget constraints could impact the continuation or scope of such contracts. The 'full and open competition' aspect suggests the market was robust, potentially mitigating some risks related to contractor availability.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (UEI: 074103508)
Address: 2010 LEWIS TURNER BLVD, FORT WALTON BE, FL
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,876,504
Exercised Options: $17,876,504
Current Obligation: $17,876,504
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: M6785402A9017
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-21
Current End Date: 2010-09-28
Potential End Date: 2010-09-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-09-09
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)