Leidos, Inc. awarded $66.6M contract for training aids and devices by Naval Air Warfare Center Training
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $66,654,063 ($66.7M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-09-10
End Date: 2009-11-30
Contract Duration: 2,273 days
Daily Burn Rate: $29.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200312!000459!1700!A8303 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133900D0710 !A!N! !N!0021 !20030910!20030930!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000002642460!N!N!000000000000!J069!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/TRAINING AIDS & DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !334290!E! !5!B!M! !D! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!001!A! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: FORT IRWIN, SAN BERNARDINO County, CALIFORNIA, 92310, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $66.7 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: 200312!000459!1700!A8303 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133900D0710 !A!N! !N!0021 !20030910!20030930!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000002642460!N!N!0… Key points: 1. Contract value of $66.6 million for maintenance and repair of training aids and devices. 2. Awarded by the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division. 3. Contract duration spans from September 10, 2003, to November 30, 2009. 4. The contract falls under the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' NAICS code. 5. This contract was awarded under full and open competition. 6. The primary place of performance is California.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $66.6 million over approximately six years for training aids and devices maintenance and repair appears to be within a reasonable range for such services. However, without specific details on the scope of work, the number of devices maintained, or the complexity of repairs, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar contracts for training systems support would provide a clearer picture of whether this represents a competitive price.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The fact that it was competed broadly suggests a healthy market for these services and likely led to competitive pricing. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition is a positive sign for price discovery and taxpayer value.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring that the government receives the best possible value for its investment.
Public Impact
Naval personnel benefit from well-maintained and functional training aids and devices, enhancing their readiness and skill development. The services delivered ensure the operational availability of critical training equipment for various naval training programs. The primary geographic impact is in California, where the place of performance is located. The contract supports jobs within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, particularly those related to equipment maintenance and training support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if the definition of 'maintenance and repair' is not strictly managed.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical training equipment could pose risks if performance falters.
- The long duration of the contract (over 6 years) might lead to less frequent opportunities for re-competition and potential price increases over time.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that should yield good value.
- The contractor, Leidos, Inc., is a large and established company with significant experience in government contracting.
- The contract specifies a fixed-price type, which shifts some of the cost risk to the contractor.
Sector Analysis
The defense training and simulation market is a significant segment within the broader aerospace and defense industry. This contract for maintenance and repair of training aids and devices fits within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and ensuring personnel are adequately trained on complex systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other contracts for similar support services across different military branches and defense contractors.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded to a major prime contractor, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. However, the extent of small business subcontracting is not detailed in the provided data. The focus on a large prime contractor might limit direct opportunities for small businesses unless specific subcontracting plans are mandated and enforced.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, with potential involvement from the Department of Defense's Inspector General. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award announcements and public databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Training Systems Support
- Defense Training and Simulation Contracts
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts
- Maintenance and Repair of Equipment Contracts
- Department of Defense IT and Training Services
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
- Potential for performance degradation over extended contract period.
- Scope definition for 'maintenance and repair' needs clarity.
- Limited insight into specific performance metrics and KPIs.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, naval-air-warfare-center-training-systems-division, leidos-inc, fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, training-aids-and-devices, maintenance-and-repair, california, large-business, service-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $66.7 million to LEIDOS, INC.. 200312!000459!1700!A8303 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133900D0710 !A!N! !N!0021 !20030910!20030930!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000002642460!N!N!000000000000!J069!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/TRAINING AIDS & DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !334290!E! !5!B!M! !D! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!001!A! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $66.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-09-10. End: 2009-11-30.
What is the specific scope of 'maintenance and repair' for the training aids and devices covered under this contract?
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of 'maintenance and repair' for the training aids and devices. This would typically encompass routine upkeep, diagnostic checks, component replacement, software updates, and corrective actions for malfunctions. The Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division would have defined these requirements in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). Without the SOW, it's difficult to ascertain the full extent of services, ranging from simple preventative measures to complex overhauls of sophisticated training simulators and equipment. Understanding the scope is crucial for evaluating the contract's value and the contractor's performance.
How does the $66.6 million contract value compare to similar contracts for training aids and devices maintenance?
Benchmarking the $66.6 million contract value against similar contracts requires access to a database of comparable awards. Factors such as the type and quantity of training devices, the complexity of the systems, the duration of the contract, and the specific services included (e.g., depot-level repair vs. field service) significantly influence pricing. Given that this contract spans over six years (2003-2009) and covers maintenance and repair for unspecified training aids and devices, the annual average value is roughly $10 million. This figure needs to be compared with other contracts for similar scope and scale within the Department of Defense to determine if it represents good value for money. Without such comparative data, it's challenging to definitively assess its competitiveness.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to assess Leidos, Inc.'s performance on this contract?
The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to assess Leidos, Inc.'s performance. Typically, contracts of this nature would include KPIs related to response times for maintenance requests, equipment uptime or availability rates, successful repair completion rates, adherence to maintenance schedules, and customer satisfaction. The Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division would have established these metrics in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) or SOW. Performance would likely be monitored through regular progress reports submitted by the contractor and reviewed by government contracting officers and technical representatives.
What is the historical spending pattern for training aids and devices maintenance and repair by the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division?
The provided data only includes information for this specific $66.6 million contract awarded in 2003. To understand historical spending patterns, one would need to analyze contract awards for the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) over several preceding years and potentially beyond the end date of this contract (2009). This analysis would involve identifying trends in contract values, types of services procured (maintenance, repair, upgrades, new acquisitions), and the primary contractors involved. Such a review could reveal whether spending on training aids and devices has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether the nature of the services procured has evolved.
What are the potential risks associated with a long-term (over 6 years) contract for maintenance and repair of training equipment?
Long-term contracts for maintenance and repair, like this one spanning over six years, carry several potential risks. Firstly, technology obsolescence is a significant concern; training aids and devices can become outdated rapidly, potentially making the maintenance services less relevant or requiring costly upgrades not fully accounted for in the original contract. Secondly, contractor performance can degrade over time, and a long contract duration reduces the government's ability to switch providers if issues arise, potentially leading to prolonged periods of subpar service. Thirdly, fixed-price contracts over extended periods may not adequately account for inflation or unforeseen cost increases, potentially leading to contractor requests for equitable adjustments or reduced service quality if margins are squeezed. Finally, the lack of frequent re-competition can reduce the incentive for the incumbent contractor to innovate or offer the most competitive pricing throughout the contract's life.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92121
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6133900D0710
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-09-10
Current End Date: 2009-11-30
Potential End Date: 2009-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-05-29
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)