DoD Awards $25.5M Contract for Helicopter Pad Design and Construction to Tutor Perini Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,547,887 ($25.5M)

Contractor: Tutor Perini Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-09-30

End Date: 2011-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 60

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT HELICOPTER PAD.

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.5 million to TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION for work described as: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT HELICOPTER PAD. Key points: 1. The contract value of $25.5 million is for a specific construction project. 2. Tutor Perini Corporation, a large established firm, secured the award. 3. The project involves construction, a sector with varying cost pressures. 4. The firm fixed price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $25.5 million for designing and constructing a helicopter pad appears within a reasonable range for complex construction projects of this nature. Benchmarking against similar specialized construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing compared to limited or sole-source procurements.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is beneficial for taxpayers, as it aims to secure the best value and price for the government's investment in infrastructure.

Public Impact

Construction projects can impact local economies through job creation and material sourcing. Infrastructure improvements like helicopter pads can enhance military operational capabilities. The duration of the project (1095 days) indicates a significant undertaking with potential for extended public interest or disruption.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The construction sector is characterized by project-specific bidding and varying levels of competition. Spending benchmarks for similar military construction projects would be necessary for a detailed comparison.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract award. The prime contractor, Tutor Perini Corporation, is a large business.

Oversight & Accountability

Standard oversight for construction projects would involve monitoring progress, quality, and adherence to contract terms. The Department of Defense typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its construction contracts.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.5 million to TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT HELICOPTER PAD.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-30. End: 2011-09-30.

What is the typical cost range for designing and constructing a military-grade helicopter pad of this size and complexity?

The typical cost range for designing and constructing a military-grade helicopter pad can vary significantly based on location, soil conditions, required load-bearing capacity, lighting, safety features, and integration with existing infrastructure. While $25.5 million is substantial, specialized military requirements can drive costs higher than civilian equivalents. A detailed cost analysis would compare this to similar DoD projects.

What are the primary risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for a long-duration construction project like this?

The primary risks for the government under a firm fixed-price contract for a long-duration project include potential for contractor default if costs escalate unexpectedly, or if the contractor miscalculates the scope or complexity. For the contractor, risks include underestimating costs, material price increases, labor shortages, and unforeseen site conditions, which could lead to reduced profit margins or financial losses.

How effectively does full and open competition ensure value for money in specialized construction contracts?

Full and open competition is generally effective in ensuring value for money by fostering a competitive environment where multiple qualified contractors bid. This pressure incentivizes contractors to offer their most competitive pricing and innovative solutions. However, for highly specialized or technically complex projects, the number of truly capable bidders might be limited, potentially reducing the competitive intensity compared to more common construction types.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912ER04R0004

Offers Received: 60

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 73 MT WAYTE AVENUE, FRAMINGHAM, MA, 05

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,547,887

Exercised Options: $25,547,887

Current Obligation: $25,547,887

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912ER04D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-09-30

Current End Date: 2011-09-30

Potential End Date: 2011-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-05-17

More Contracts from Tutor Perini Corporation

View all Tutor Perini Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending