Department of Education awarded $175M for student aid servicing, with 4 bidders competing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $175,468,222 ($175.5M)

Contractor: Pennslyvania Higher Education Assistance Agency

Awarding Agency: Department of Education

Start Date: 2015-09-01

End Date: 2016-12-31

Contract Duration: 487 days

Daily Burn Rate: $360.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF / CRITICAL FUNCTION IDIQ: SERVICING OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL AID TASK ORDER: SERVICING OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL AID, FROM 9/1/2015 THROUGH 8/31/2016. PROVIDES FUNDING FOR TITLE IV AID SERVICING THROUGH APPROXIMATELY 12/21/2015.

Place of Performance

Location: HARRISBURG, DAUPHIN County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17102

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Education obligated $175.5 million to PENNSLYVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF / CRITICAL FUNCTION IDIQ: SERVICING OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL AID TASK ORDER: SERVICING OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL AID, FROM 9/1/2015 THROUGH 8/31/2016. PROVIDES FUNDING FOR TITLE IV AID SERVICING THROUGH APPROXIMATELY 12/21/2015. Key points: 1. Contract provides essential servicing for Title IV student financial aid. 2. Funding covers aid servicing through late 2015. 3. The contract was awarded via full and open competition. 4. The contractor, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, has a significant role in state-level student aid. 5. The contract duration is approximately 487 days. 6. Fixed price with economic price adjustment is the contract type.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $175.5 million for approximately 16 months of service appears reasonable given the critical nature of Title IV student financial aid servicing. Benchmarking against similar large-scale student loan servicing contracts would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the competitive nature of the award suggests a degree of price discovery that likely yielded a fair market price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With four bidders participating, the competition level suggests a healthy market for these services. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more cost-effective solutions for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process for student financial aid servicing ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently, as multiple entities vied to provide the best service at a competitive price.

Public Impact

Benefits millions of students and families relying on Title IV federal student financial aid. Ensures the continued operation and servicing of federal student loan programs. Services are delivered nationwide, impacting the accessibility of higher education. Supports the administrative workforce involved in student financial aid processing.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The federal student financial aid servicing sector is a critical component of the Department of Education's mission, involving the management and disbursement of billions of dollars in loans and grants. This contract fits within the broader IT and administrative services category supporting government operations. Comparable spending in this sector involves large-scale IT systems and customer service operations for loan portfolios.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside. The awarded contractor, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, is a state entity, not a small business. There is no immediate indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific award, though larger prime contractors often engage small businesses for specialized support services in broader contracts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Education's contracting officers and program managers. The Inspector General's office for the Department of Education would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-education, student-financial-aid, title-iv-aid, servicing-contract, fixed-price-with-economic-price-adjustment, full-and-open-competition, pennsylvania-higher-education-assistance-agency, federal-student-loans, administrative-services, higher-education

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Education awarded $175.5 million to PENNSLYVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY. IGF::CT::IGF / CRITICAL FUNCTION IDIQ: SERVICING OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL AID TASK ORDER: SERVICING OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL AID, FROM 9/1/2015 THROUGH 8/31/2016. PROVIDES FUNDING FOR TITLE IV AID SERVICING THROUGH APPROXIMATELY 12/21/2015.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PENNSLYVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Education (Department of Education).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $175.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-09-01. End: 2016-12-31.

What is the track record of the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA) in servicing federal student aid programs?

PHEAA has a long-standing history of servicing student loans, including federal loans, through various programs. As a state agency, it has been involved in managing and disbursing state-based grants and loans, and has also participated in federal loan servicing contracts. Their experience includes managing large loan portfolios, processing applications, and providing customer service to student borrowers. While specific performance metrics for this particular contract are not detailed here, PHEAA's general operational capacity and experience in the student aid landscape suggest a foundational capability to perform the contracted services. Further analysis would require examining past performance reviews and any documented issues or successes during their tenure as a federal loan servicer.

How does the $175.5 million contract value compare to similar federal student aid servicing contracts?

Directly comparing the $175.5 million value requires identifying contracts with identical scope, duration, and service levels. However, given that this contract covers approximately 16 months of servicing for Title IV federal student financial aid, the cost per month is roughly $10.97 million. Large federal IT and administrative service contracts can range widely, but for critical, high-volume functions like student aid servicing, this figure appears within a plausible range. The Department of Education manages substantial budgets for student aid, and the servicing contracts are essential for operational continuity. Without specific benchmark data for comparable federal student aid servicing contracts, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process provides some assurance of reasonable pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this student financial aid servicing contract?

Key risks include operational disruptions that could impact student access to financial aid, data security breaches involving sensitive student financial information, and potential cost overruns due to the economic price adjustment clause. Performance failures by the contractor could lead to delays in fund disbursement, incorrect servicing of loans, and negative impacts on student borrowers and institutions. Furthermore, a heavy reliance on a single contractor for such a critical function presents a concentration risk. Ensuring robust performance monitoring, clear communication channels, and contingency planning are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective is the current servicing model for Title IV student financial aid in terms of efficiency and student support?

The effectiveness of the current servicing model is multifaceted. On the efficiency front, the use of large contracts with experienced entities like PHEAA aims to leverage economies of scale and established infrastructure to manage the vast volume of Title IV aid. However, challenges can arise from the complexity of federal regulations, the need for continuous system updates, and the sheer number of borrowers. In terms of student support, the goal is to provide timely information, accessible repayment options, and responsive customer service. The effectiveness here can vary, with some borrowers reporting positive experiences while others face difficulties navigating the system or accessing necessary assistance. Continuous evaluation of borrower satisfaction and operational metrics is key to assessing and improving effectiveness.

What are the historical spending patterns for student financial aid servicing by the Department of Education?

Historical spending on student financial aid servicing by the Department of Education has been substantial, reflecting the scale of federal student loan programs. Over the years, the Department has utilized various contracting mechanisms, including large IDIQs and task orders, to secure servicing capabilities. Spending has fluctuated based on program changes, loan volume, and the specific contracting strategies employed. The trend has generally been towards consolidating servicing functions to achieve efficiencies, but also involves managing multiple servicers to ensure competition and mitigate risk. Analyzing historical data would reveal significant investments in IT infrastructure, customer service operations, and program administration necessary to support millions of student borrowers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Finance and InsuranceActivities Related to Credit IntermediationOther Activities Related to Credit Intermediation

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Address: 1200 NORTH SEVENTH STREET, HARRISBURG, PA, 17102

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, U.S. Regional/State Government

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $175,468,222

Exercised Options: $175,468,222

Current Obligation: $175,468,222

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: EDFSA09D0014

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-09-01

Current End Date: 2016-12-31

Potential End Date: 2016-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2022-04-02

More Contracts from Pennslyvania Higher Education Assistance Agency

View all Pennslyvania Higher Education Assistance Agency federal contracts →

Other Department of Education Contracts

View all Department of Education contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending