DoD's $621M AT&T Contract for Telecom Network Management Services Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,461,441 ($14.5M)

Contractor: AT&T Enterprises, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 1999-08-12

End Date: 2010-11-30

Contract Duration: 4,128 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 199912!9700!2439!ZD11 !DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20097D0054 !A!*!0015 !19990812!19991031!621599893!006980080!006980080!N!0LUL1!AT&T CORP !2020 K ST NW STE 700 !WASHINGTON !DC!20006!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !0001!+000002000000!N!N!000000000000!D316!TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK MANAGEMENT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !4899!5!B!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!J!2!003!C!* !C!N!Z!* !* !Y!C!*!Z!Z!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: VIENNA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22182

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.5 million to AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC for work described as: 199912!9700!2439!ZD11 !DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20097D0054 !A!*!0015 !19990812!19991031!621599893!006980080!006980080!N!0LUL1!AT&T CORP !2020 K ST NW STE 700 !WASHINGTON !DC!20006!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRI… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $621,599,893, was awarded to AT&T Corp. for telecommunication network management services. 2. Awarded by the Department of Defense (DISA), the contract utilized full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is substantial, spanning from August 1999 to November 2010, indicating a long-term service need. 4. The primary service category is 'Electronics and Communication', aligning with the contract's description. 5. No specific small business participation was noted, suggesting potential missed opportunities for smaller vendors.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $621.6 million over its extended period appears reasonable for comprehensive telecommunication network management services, especially given the scale of the Department of Defense's needs. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government IT contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The use of a delivery order mechanism within a larger contract framework suggests flexibility in tasking and pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is designed to maximize taxpayer value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and improves service quality.

Public Impact

Ensures critical communication infrastructure for the Department of Defense remains operational and secure. Supports national defense readiness by providing reliable telecommunication services. Impacts a wide range of DoD operations that depend on robust network connectivity. Potential for technological advancements in telecommunications services through competitive bidding.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) and Defense sectors, specifically focusing on telecommunication network management. Government spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need for secure and reliable communication systems for national security and operational efficiency.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary consideration or was not explicitly tracked for this contract. This could represent a missed opportunity to leverage the innovation and agility of small businesses within the telecommunications sector.

Oversight & Accountability

While awarded through full and open competition, the long duration and significant value necessitate robust oversight to ensure continued value, adherence to service level agreements, and adaptation to evolving technologies. Specific oversight mechanisms are not detailed in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.5 million to AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC. 199912!9700!2439!ZD11 !DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20097D0054 !A!*!0015 !19990812!19991031!621599893!006980080!006980080!N!0LUL1!AT&T CORP !2020 K ST NW STE 700 !WASHINGTON !DC!20006!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !0001!+000002000000!N!N!000000000000!D316!TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK MANAGEMENT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !4899!5!B!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!J!2!0

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-08-12. End: 2010-11-30.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) established for this contract, and how were they monitored to ensure AT&T met its obligations?

The provided data does not detail the specific KPIs or SLAs for this contract. Effective oversight would require clearly defined metrics for network uptime, latency, security compliance, and response times. Regular performance reviews and audits by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) would be crucial to ensure AT&T consistently met these standards throughout the contract's lifecycle.

Given the contract's 11-year duration, what measures were in place to manage technological obsolescence and ensure the DoD benefited from advancements in telecommunications?

A contract of this length, spanning from 1999 to 2010, inherently risks technological obsolescence. Effective management would likely involve contract clauses allowing for technology refreshes, periodic re-evaluations of service offerings, and potentially competitive task orders for upgrades. Without explicit details, it's assumed DISA managed this through contract modifications or by leveraging delivery orders to incorporate newer technologies as they became available.

How did the 'full and open competition' process specifically influence the final pricing and service terms compared to other potential contracting methods?

Full and open competition typically drives down prices by allowing multiple qualified vendors to bid, fostering a competitive environment. For this contract, it likely resulted in AT&T offering more favorable rates and service terms than might have been achieved through sole-source or limited competition. The government could solicit proposals detailing technical solutions and pricing, enabling a thorough evaluation to select the best overall value.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AT&T Inc.

Address: 2020 K ST NW STE 700, WASHINGTON, DC, 20006

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DCA20097D0054

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 1999-08-12

Current End Date: 2010-11-30

Potential End Date: 2010-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-09-29

More Contracts from AT&T Enterprises, LLC

View all AT&T Enterprises, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending