DoD Awards $49.7M for Iraq Construction Services to Fluor Intercontinental, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $49,775,272 ($49.8M)
Contractor: Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-07-27
End Date: 2014-07-18
Contract Duration: 3,278 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 60
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200511!501416!2100!W912ER!TRANSATLANTIC PROGRAM CENTER !W912ER04D0004 !A!N! !N!0014 ! !20050727!20060120!130757870!059220392!006907190!N!FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC !6000 FAIRVIEW RD !CHARLOTTE !NC!28210!00000! !IZ!* !* !IRAQ !+000004615863!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !236220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!Y!J!2!060!B! !Z!N!A! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $49.8 million to FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC. for work described as: 200511!501416!2100!W912ER!TRANSATLANTIC PROGRAM CENTER !W912ER04D0004 !A!N! !N!0014 ! !20050727!20060120!130757870!059220392!006907190!N!FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC !6000 FAIRVIEW RD !CHARLOTTE !NC!28210!00000! !IZ!* !* !IRAQ !+000004615863!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEO… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for construction services in Iraq. 2. Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. is the primary contractor. 3. Significant taxpayer investment in infrastructure projects. 4. Potential risks associated with operating in a conflict zone.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $49.7 million for construction services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. However, without specific benchmarks for similar projects in Iraq during that period, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for essential construction services in a critical region, aiming for infrastructure development and support.
Public Impact
Supports infrastructure development in Iraq. Provides employment opportunities for construction workers. Contributes to U.S. foreign policy objectives in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 60 / 10
Warning Flags
- Geopolitical risks in Iraq
- Potential for cost overruns in complex projects
- Logistical challenges for materials and personnel
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition
- Experienced contractor with relevant project history
- Focus on essential infrastructure
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector for defense-related construction, especially in overseas contingency operations, can be substantial and subject to unique market dynamics and risks.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this was a large contract awarded to Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. There is no specific information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses on this particular award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight of construction projects in active operational zones is critical. The Department of Defense and potentially other agencies would be responsible for monitoring progress, quality, and financial expenditures to ensure accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Operating in a conflict zone (Iraq)
- Potential for scope creep and cost overruns
- Logistical and supply chain complexities
- Security risks to personnel and assets
- Quality control in challenging environments
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $49.8 million to FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC.. 200511!501416!2100!W912ER!TRANSATLANTIC PROGRAM CENTER !W912ER04D0004 !A!N! !N!0014 ! !20050727!20060120!130757870!059220392!006907190!N!FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC !6000 FAIRVIEW RD !CHARLOTTE !NC!28210!00000! !IZ!* !* !IRAQ !+000004615863!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !236220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!Y!J!2!060!B! !Z!N!A! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $49.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-07-27. End: 2014-07-18.
What was the specific nature of the 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS' constructed under this contract, and how did their utility justify the $49.7 million investment?
The contract specified 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS,' which is a broad category. These likely included various support facilities, temporary structures, or specialized buildings essential for military operations or reconstruction efforts in Iraq. The justification for the investment would hinge on their direct contribution to mission success, troop welfare, or stabilization goals within the operational theater.
Given the full and open competition, what was the range of bids received, and how did Fluor Intercontinental's proposal compare in terms of cost and technical merit?
While the award indicates full and open competition, the specific bid range and Fluor Intercontinental's comparative standing are not detailed in this data. Typically, a competitive process involves multiple proposals evaluated on factors like price, past performance, and technical approach. Understanding this comparison would reveal the degree of price competition and the perceived value offered by the winning contractor.
What mechanisms were in place to mitigate risks associated with construction in Iraq, such as security threats, material shortages, and quality control, and how effective were they?
Mitigation strategies likely included robust security protocols for personnel and sites, detailed logistical planning for supply chains, and stringent quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) processes. Effectiveness would be measured by project completion rates, incident reports, and post-construction assessments. The complexity and duration of the project suggest that ongoing risk management and adaptation were crucial.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 60
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Fluor Corporation (UEI: 006907190)
Address: 6000 FAIRVIEW AT J A JON, CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912ER04D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-07-27
Current End Date: 2014-07-18
Potential End Date: 2014-07-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-06-14
More Contracts from Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.
- Logcap IV Services Afghanistan — $12.6B (Department of Defense)
- Afghanistan South Expansion — $639.9M (Department of Defense)
- 200607!601203!2100!w912er!transatlantic Program Center !w912er04d0004 !A!N! !Y!0017 ! !20060410!20070514!140243291!140243291!006907190!n!fluor Intercontinental Inc !100 Fluor Daniel Drive !greenville !SC!29607!00000! !IZ! ! !iraq !+000059103585!n!n!000000000000!z299!maint/All Other Non-Building Facilities !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!2!030!b! !Z!N!A! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $375.8M (Department of Defense)
- Hafb Operation Allies Welcome (refuge) - O21R — $352.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200312!001241!2100!CA78 !transatlantic Program Center !daca7803d0005 !A!N! !N!0006 !20030919!20040331!615422995!615422995!006907190!n!fluor Intercontinental, Inc !ONE Enterprise Drive !aliso Viejo !CA!92656!* !* !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000000460000!n!n!000000000000!y199!other Miscellaneous Buildings !C2 !construction !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !236220!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20040331!B! ! !n!a!d!n!u!1!001!n!2a!z!n!z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! !Y!Y! ! !0001! ! — $334.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)