DoD's $189M Aviation and Missile Command Contract Awarded to Morgan Research Corporation for Engineering Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,778,195 ($34.8M)

Contractor: CGI Federal Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-22

End Date: 2011-09-21

Contract Duration: 2,190 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200512!005519!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0030 !A!N! !N!0013 ! !20050922!20060930!189071368!189071368!189071368!N!MORGAN RESEARCH CORPORATION !4811-A BRADFORD DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000110537!Y!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !20200930!C! ! !N!Z!A!N!J!2!002! ! !Z!N!Z! ! !Y!A!Y!N!Z! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.8 million to CGI FEDERAL INC. for work described as: 200512!005519!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0030 !A!N! !N!0013 ! !20050922!20060930!189071368!189071368!189071368!N!MORGAN RESEARCH CORPORATION !4811-A BRADFORD DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADI… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $189,071,368, was awarded for engineering technical services. 2. Morgan Research Corporation, based in Huntsville, AL, secured this significant award. 3. The contract falls under the Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. 4. This award represents a substantial investment in specialized engineering support for aviation and missile systems.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $189,071,368 for engineering technical services appears reasonable given the duration and specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar large-scale R&D contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors have the opportunity to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for critical defense engineering services.

Public Impact

Supports critical defense capabilities in aviation and missile technology. Invests in specialized engineering expertise vital for national security. Contributes to the technological advancement of U.S. defense systems. Potential for job creation and economic activity in the Huntsville, AL region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration of 10 years may warrant closer monitoring for scope creep or evolving requirements.
Reliance on a single vendor for extensive engineering services could pose a long-term risk if capabilities are not maintained or expanded.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
Focus on specialized engineering services for critical defense assets.
Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery and planning.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on engineering technical services for aviation and missile systems. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority in defense.

Small Business Impact

While this contract is a large award, the analysis does not indicate specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses. Further review would be needed to determine any small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense and the Defense Contract Management Agency are responsible for oversight. The long duration necessitates consistent monitoring to ensure performance, cost control, and adherence to contract terms.

Related Government Programs

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration (10 years)
Potential for vendor lock-in
Reliance on specialized engineering services
Need for continuous performance monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.8 million to CGI FEDERAL INC.. 200512!005519!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0030 !A!N! !N!0013 ! !20050922!20060930!189071368!189071368!189071368!N!MORGAN RESEARCH CORPORATION !4811-A BRADFORD DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000110537!Y!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CGI FEDERAL INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-22. End: 2011-09-21.

What specific engineering technical services are included in this contract, and how do they align with current and future DoD priorities?

The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' (NAICS 541710) for the USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND. While the exact scope is not detailed here, it likely encompasses design, analysis, testing, and integration support for aviation and missile systems. These services are critical for maintaining and advancing the capabilities of these complex defense assets, aligning with ongoing DoD priorities for modernization and technological superiority.

What are the potential risks associated with a 10-year contract for specialized engineering services, and how are they mitigated?

A 10-year contract carries risks such as technological obsolescence, potential vendor lock-in, and the challenge of accurately forecasting future needs. Mitigation strategies could include performance-based metrics, regular reviews of evolving requirements, incorporating flexibility clauses for scope adjustments, and maintaining market surveillance to ensure continued competitive pricing and access to alternative solutions if necessary.

How does the firm-fixed-price contract type impact the government's ability to manage costs and ensure value for money over the contract's lifespan?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract shifts most of the cost risk to the contractor, providing the government with cost certainty. This is beneficial for managing budgets. However, for complex R&D services, FFP might incentivize contractors to cut corners if not carefully monitored, potentially impacting quality. Robust performance metrics and oversight are crucial to ensure value for money is achieved despite the fixed price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CGI Inc (UEI: 248513116)

Address: 12601 FAIR LAKES CIR, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W31P4Q05A0030

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline