DoD's $65.3M FSR II KUWAIT Contract Awarded to General Dynamics for Armored Vehicles

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $65,281,296 ($65.3M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Land Systems - Force Protection Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-29

End Date: 2012-03-05

Contract Duration: 888 days

Daily Burn Rate: $73.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FSR II KUWAIT

Place of Performance

Location: LADSON, CHARLESTON County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29456

State: South Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $65.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS - FORCE PROTECTION INC. for work described as: FSR II KUWAIT Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $65.3 million, was awarded to General Dynamics Land Systems. 2. It falls under the Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing sector. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract duration was 888 days, ending in March 2012.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract was awarded under a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) type, which is generally favorable for the government as it shifts cost risk to the contractor. The specific pricing details relative to market benchmarks are not provided, but FFP is a standard and often cost-effective pricing strategy.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This method typically fosters price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through a competitive process, potentially lowering overall costs.

Public Impact

This contract supports the Department of Defense's armored vehicle needs, contributing to national security. The procurement process involved competitive bidding, ensuring a potentially fair price for taxpayers. The contract was executed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, indicating oversight. The specific end-use and impact of the FSR II KUWAIT system are not detailed but relate to military operational capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes.
No indication of small business participation.
Limited detail on the specific nature of the armored vehicle system.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Utilized a Firm Fixed Price contract type.
Managed by a specialized agency (DCMA).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on the manufacturing of military armored vehicles and their components. Spending in this sector is critical for national defense capabilities and is subject to rigorous procurement standards and oversight due to its strategic importance and high costs.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this contract award (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the prime contractor is likely a large business, and there is no explicit information on subcontracting to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractors meet performance, cost, and schedule requirements. The award itself, being a delivery order under a larger contract, implies prior oversight and established terms.

Related Government Programs

Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed technical specifications.
No information on small business subcontracting.
Absence of performance metrics or evaluation criteria.
Limited insight into the specific operational impact or necessity of the system.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $65.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS - FORCE PROTECTION INC.. FSR II KUWAIT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS - FORCE PROTECTION INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $65.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-29. End: 2012-03-05.

What was the specific type and capability of the FSR II KUWAIT armored vehicle system, and how did it compare to existing or alternative systems at the time of procurement?

The provided data does not specify the exact model or capabilities of the FSR II KUWAIT system. It is categorized broadly under 'Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing.' Without further details, a comparison to existing or alternative systems is not possible. Understanding the specific technological advancements or unique features would be crucial for assessing its value beyond the contract price.

Given the $65.3 million contract value and the 888-day duration, what was the estimated cost per day or per unit, and how does this benchmark against similar defense procurements?

The total contract value was $65,281,295.69 over 888 days. This averages to approximately $73,515 per day. However, without knowing the number of units procured or the specific nature of the services rendered, a meaningful per-unit cost benchmark is impossible. Comparing this daily burn rate to similar complex defense system procurements would require detailed cost data and scope of work for comparable contracts.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract, and how was the contractor's performance evaluated to ensure effectiveness and value for taxpayer money?

The data provided does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or details on how the contractor's performance was evaluated. While the contract was Firm Fixed Price, implying a focus on delivery, the effectiveness and ultimate value to the taxpayer depend on factors like reliability, maintainability, and operational success in the field, which are not detailed in this summary.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing › Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: M6785407R5000

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 9801 HIGHWAY 78 # 3, LADSON, SC, 29456

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $65,281,296

Exercised Options: $65,281,296

Current Obligation: $65,281,296

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785407D5031

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline