DoD's $178.6M IT Services Contract with Computer Sciences Corp. Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,675,015 ($27.7M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-08-10

End Date: 2010-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,694 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200511!000512!5700!FA8770!MSG/PK !FA877004D0042 !A!N! !Y!0013 ! !20050810!20090602!178594099!178594099!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !2600 PARAMOUNT PL !FAIRBORN !OH!45324!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREENE !OHIO !+000008119209!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541519!E! !3!B!M! !A!C!20090602!B!F!N!A! !A!N!R!2!010!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45431

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.7 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: 200511!000512!5700!FA8770!MSG/PK !FA877004D0042 !A!N! !Y!0013 ! !20050810!20090602!178594099!178594099!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !2600 PARAMOUNT PL !FAIRBORN !OH!45324!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREE… Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $178.6 million, indicating a significant IT services requirement. 2. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. was a competitor, suggesting a competitive market for these services. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes better pricing. 4. The sector is IT services, specifically 'Other Computer Related Services', a common area for federal spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $178.6 million over approximately 5 years for IT services needs careful benchmarking. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it's difficult to definitively assess value against similar contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Awarded under full and open competition, this method typically allows for the widest range of potential bidders, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces.

Public Impact

This contract supports the Department of the Air Force, likely impacting critical operational capabilities. The duration of the contract (over 4 years) suggests a long-term need for these IT services. The specific nature of 'Other Computer Related Services' could encompass a wide range of support, from software development to network maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
Contract type 'COST PLUS AWARD FEE' can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed tightly.
The 'Other ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES' category is broad and may obscure specific cost drivers.

Positive Signals

Awarded via full and open competition.
Multiple competitors were likely involved, indicated by the presence of a named competitor.
The contract supports a key defense agency (Air Force).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically under 'Other Computer Related Services'. Federal IT spending is a significant portion of the overall budget, with benchmarks varying widely based on service type and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. This suggests the contract was likely awarded to a large business capable of meeting the extensive requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, implying oversight from this agency. Further details on specific oversight mechanisms and performance reviews would be needed for a comprehensive assessment.

Related Government Programs

Other Computer Related Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Broad service category may obscure specific cost drivers.
CPAF contract type requires diligent oversight to control costs.
Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders value assessment.
Potential for cost overruns if award fee criteria are not strictly managed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.7 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. 200511!000512!5700!FA8770!MSG/PK !FA877004D0042 !A!N! !Y!0013 ! !20050810!20090602!178594099!178594099!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !2600 PARAMOUNT PL !FAIRBORN !OH!45324!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREENE !OHIO !+000008119209!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541519!E! !3!B!M! !A!C!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-08-10. End: 2010-03-31.

What specific IT services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Air Force's strategic objectives?

The contract falls under 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519), a broad category. Without a detailed statement of work, it's unclear if these services included software development, system integration, cybersecurity, or general IT support. Understanding the specific services is crucial to assessing their alignment with the Air Force's mission and technological modernization goals.

How was the 'COST PLUS AWARD FEE' structure managed to ensure cost control and incentivize performance?

Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts allow the contractor to recover costs plus a fee that is based on performance against pre-defined criteria. Effective management requires clear, objective performance metrics and rigorous oversight to ensure the award fee is earned only for exceptional performance, thereby controlling overall costs and driving desired outcomes.

What was the competitive landscape like for this specific 'Other Computer Related Services' requirement, and did the full and open competition yield significant cost savings?

While awarded under full and open competition, the actual number of bids received and the resulting price spread are not detailed. The presence of a named competitor (General Dynamics) suggests some level of competition. Assessing the cost savings would require comparing the awarded price against independent government cost estimates or historical pricing for similar services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 2600 PARAMOUNT PLACE, FAIRBORN, OH, 10

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA877004D0042

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline