DoD's $16.5M Training Support Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for 5+ Years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,556,809 ($16.6M)

Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-08

End Date: 2016-03-26

Contract Duration: 2,026 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: J 7/9 TRAINING SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28301

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: J 7/9 TRAINING SUPPORT Key points: 1. The contract's value of over $16.5 million suggests a significant investment in specialized training support services. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. secured this award through full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of over 5 years (2010-2016) implies a long-term need for these services. 4. The North Carolina location for performance may point to specific operational needs or existing infrastructure. 5. The 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code suggests a focus on operational efficiency and strategic planning. 6. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for the services. 7. The award was a delivery order, indicating it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $16.5 million contract is challenging without more specific details on the scope of training support provided. However, the duration of over five years suggests a substantial, ongoing requirement. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control, but the ultimate value depends on the efficiency and effectiveness of the services delivered by Amentum Technology, Inc. Comparing this to similar training support contracts within the Department of Defense or U.S. Special Operations Command would provide a clearer picture of its cost-effectiveness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 4 bidders (as indicated by 'no': 4) suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While not an exhaustive number, it indicates that multiple companies vied for the opportunity, which typically helps in achieving a reasonable price.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service quality, preventing potential overcharges associated with less competitive solicitations.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely U.S. Special Operations Command personnel who receive enhanced training. The services delivered are expected to improve the readiness and effectiveness of special operations forces. Performance is located in North Carolina, potentially impacting the local economy through job creation or contractor presence. The contract supports the operational capabilities of elite military units, indirectly benefiting national security.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management consulting and administrative support for training. The federal government, particularly the Department of Defense, is a major consumer of such services to enhance operational readiness and efficiency. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for training development, simulation, and support services across various military branches and agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors if it aligns with their project needs and procurement strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the U.S. Special Operations Command contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance work statement, requiring adherence to specific standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, u.s.-special-operations-command, training-support, administrative-management, general-management-consulting, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, north-carolina, amentum-technology-inc, professional-scientific-and-technical-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. J 7/9 TRAINING SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-08. End: 2016-03-26.

What specific training support services were provided under this contract?

The contract falls under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services), suggesting services related to the planning, management, and execution of training programs. This could encompass curriculum development, instructional design, training delivery, simulation support, logistical coordination for training events, and performance analysis. However, without the specific Performance Work Statement (PWS) or task orders associated with this delivery order, the precise nature of the training support remains undefined. It is likely tailored to the unique operational requirements of U.S. Special Operations Command.

How does the $16.5 million value compare to similar training support contracts for Special Operations Command?

Direct comparison is difficult without knowing the exact scope and duration of services. However, $16.5 million over approximately 5.5 years (September 2010 to March 2016) averages around $3 million per year. This figure is within the range for specialized support contracts within SOCOM, which often require unique expertise and high levels of service. Larger, more comprehensive training infrastructure or technology development contracts could easily exceed this amount, while smaller, more focused task orders might be significantly less. The value appears reasonable for a dedicated support function.

What are the key risks associated with a long-term training support contract like this?

Key risks include the potential for the training requirements to become outdated if not regularly reviewed and updated, leading to diminished effectiveness. There's also a risk of contractor 'lock-in,' where the incumbent contractor develops deep institutional knowledge, making it difficult for competitors to displace them even if performance is only adequate. Cost overruns can occur if the firm-fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for unforeseen complexities or scope creep. Furthermore, a long duration might reduce the agency's agility in adapting to new training methodologies or technologies.

How effective was Amentum Technology, Inc. in delivering these training support services?

Assessing the effectiveness of Amentum Technology, Inc. under this specific contract is challenging based solely on the provided data. The contract was awarded in 2010 and completed in 2016. Publicly available information typically focuses on contract awards and basic details, not granular performance reviews. Effectiveness would be measured against the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement, including factors like training completion rates, participant feedback, achievement of learning objectives, and impact on operational readiness. Without access to performance reports or CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) data, a definitive judgment on effectiveness cannot be made.

What was the historical spending trend for similar training support services by U.S. Special Operations Command prior to this award?

Analyzing historical spending trends for similar services prior to this 2010 award would require access to historical federal procurement databases (like FPDS-NG or SAM.gov archives). U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) has consistently invested in training and readiness, especially following the increased demands of post-9/11 operations. Spending on training support, simulation, and specialized personnel services has generally trended upwards over the past two decades, reflecting evolving threats and the need for highly skilled special operators. This $16.5 million contract represents a specific allocation within that broader spending pattern.

What is the significance of the 'NC' (North Carolina) designation for contract performance?

The 'NC' designation indicates that the primary place of performance for this contract was North Carolina. This could be significant for several reasons. It might align with the location of key U.S. Special Operations Command training facilities or units within the state. It could also leverage existing infrastructure or a skilled workforce in that region relevant to specialized training. For the local economy in North Carolina, it signifies potential job creation, business opportunities for support services, and a contribution to the state's defense sector presence.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: H9222209R0034

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc (UEI: 074103508)

Address: 5401 W KENNEDY BLVD STE 900, TAMPA, FL, 33609

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,556,809

Exercised Options: $16,556,809

Current Obligation: $16,556,809

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 45

Total Subaward Amount: $9,802,654

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9222210D0018

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-09-08

Current End Date: 2016-03-26

Potential End Date: 2016-03-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-01-26

More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.

View all Amentum Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending