DOD awards $56.7M for local guard force at Camp Doha, construction sector contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $56,726,844 ($56.7M)
Contractor: Tutor Perini Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-09-26
End Date: 2010-01-11
Contract Duration: 838 days
Daily Burn Rate: $67.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 60
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: TASK ORDER 0011 OHCS, LOCAL GUARD FORCE CAMP DOS
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $56.7 million to TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION for work described as: TASK ORDER 0011 OHCS, LOCAL GUARD FORCE CAMP DOS Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in base security and infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. Contract duration of over two years indicates a substantial operational requirement. 5. The award falls within the commercial and institutional building construction sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $56.7 million for a local guard force and associated construction services appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for base security and construction at overseas locations would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to cap costs, but the total expenditure warrants scrutiny to ensure it aligns with market rates for comparable services and construction in similar operational environments. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 60 bids suggests a robust level of interest and a competitive marketplace for these services. A high number of bidders generally contributes to better price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government, as contractors compete to win the award.
Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down prices and ensured the government received competitive bids for essential base security and construction services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its personnel stationed at Camp Doha, ensuring a secure operational environment. Services include the provision of a local guard force and potentially related construction activities to support base operations. The geographic impact is localized to Camp Doha, likely in an overseas location given the context of base security. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for security personnel and construction workers, potentially including local hires.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the scope of construction is not precisely defined.
- Ensuring consistent quality of guard force services over the contract duration.
- Geopolitical risks associated with operating in overseas locations can impact performance and cost.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition indicates a healthy market and potential for competitive pricing.
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- A large number of bidders (60) suggests strong contractor interest and capability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector (NAICS 236220), which encompasses establishments primarily engaged in the construction or remodeling of nonresidential buildings. The award for a guard force and related construction at a military installation like Camp Doha is a typical government procurement within this sector, often involving significant infrastructure development and ongoing operational support. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale construction and security contracts awarded by the Department of Defense for overseas bases.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside provisions (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, small businesses would have had to compete directly with larger firms. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could be a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem in supporting this significant defense contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting command. Performance monitoring would likely involve regular site visits, progress reports, and quality assurance checks to ensure compliance with contract terms. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance data may be limited. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support Services
- Military Construction
- Security Services Contracts
- Overseas Base Support
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep in construction elements.
- Ensuring consistent service delivery over the contract duration.
- Geopolitical risks in overseas operational environments.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, security-services, base-operations, overseas-contract, large-contract, tutor-perini-corporation
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $56.7 million to TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION. TASK ORDER 0011 OHCS, LOCAL GUARD FORCE CAMP DOS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $56.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-09-26. End: 2010-01-11.
What was the specific nature of the construction services included in this task order?
The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction) and mentions 'LOCAL GUARD FORCE CAMP DOS'. While the primary focus appears to be on security services, the inclusion of a construction NAICS code suggests that the task order may have encompassed construction or renovation activities related to the guard force's operational needs. This could include building or modifying guard posts, security checkpoints, administrative facilities, or other infrastructure essential for base security operations at Camp Doha. Without the full task order details, the exact scope of construction remains unspecified but is likely ancillary to the primary security mission.
How does the awarded amount of $56.7 million compare to similar guard force contracts for overseas bases?
Directly comparing the $56.7 million award to similar guard force contracts for overseas bases requires access to a broader dataset of historical procurements. However, for a contract spanning approximately two years (from September 2007 to January 2010) with a firm fixed-price structure, this amount suggests a significant operational requirement. Factors influencing this cost would include the number of personnel required, the specific security protocols, the geographic location's risk level, and any associated construction or infrastructure support. Larger, more complex overseas bases with higher security threats typically command higher contract values. A detailed analysis would involve benchmarking against contracts for bases of similar size and operational tempo.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the contractor's performance?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used for this particular contract. However, for a local guard force contract, typical KPIs would likely include metrics related to response times to incidents, adherence to post orders, personnel reliability and training, incident reporting accuracy, and overall security posture effectiveness. For any construction components, KPIs would focus on schedule adherence, quality of workmanship, safety compliance, and adherence to design specifications. The Department of the Army would have established specific measurable objectives within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) to monitor Tutor Perini Corporation's performance.
What is the track record of Tutor Perini Corporation in performing similar government contracts?
Tutor Perini Corporation is a large, diversified construction company with a significant history of undertaking complex projects, including those for government and defense clients. While this specific task order focuses on guard force and construction, the company's broader portfolio includes major infrastructure, military facilities, and base development projects. Assessing their track record for this specific type of contract would involve reviewing past performance evaluations and any past performance information (PPI) available through federal procurement databases. Their extensive experience in large-scale construction suggests a capacity to manage substantial contracts, though the specifics of their performance on security-focused task orders would require targeted investigation.
Were there any significant cost variances or change orders associated with this contract?
The provided summary data does not include details on cost variances or change orders for this specific task order. As a firm fixed-price contract, the objective is to minimize cost variances. However, large construction and security contracts, especially those performed in overseas environments, can be subject to change orders due to unforeseen conditions, scope adjustments, or evolving operational requirements. A thorough analysis of cost performance would necessitate reviewing the contract's modification history and any associated documentation detailing the reasons and financial impact of any approved changes.
How did the number of bidders (60) influence the final contract price?
A high number of bidders, such as the 60 indicated for this contract, generally exerts downward pressure on the final price due to increased competition. When numerous companies vie for a contract, they are incentivized to offer more competitive pricing to secure the award. This scenario allows the government to benefit from a robust price discovery process, potentially leading to a price that is closer to the contractors' actual costs plus a reasonable profit margin, rather than a price inflated by limited competition. The extensive bidding suggests that the market was sufficiently robust to support multiple capable offerors.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 60
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 73 MT WAYTE AVENUE, FRAMINGHAM, MA, 05
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $56,726,844
Exercised Options: $56,726,844
Current Obligation: $56,726,844
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912ER04D0008
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-09-26
Current End Date: 2010-01-11
Potential End Date: 2010-01-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-02-11
More Contracts from Tutor Perini Corporation
- 200312!001242!2100!CA78 !transatlantic Program Center !daca7803d0006 !A!N! !N!0002 !20030919!20040331!006954432!006954432!006954432!n!perini Corporation !73 MT Wayte Avenue !framingham !MA!01701!* !* !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000000460000!n!n!000000000000!y199!other Miscellaneous Buildings !C2 !construction !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !236220!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20040331!B! ! !n!a!d!n!u!1!001!n!2a!z!n!z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! !Y!Y! ! !0001! ! — $379.4M (Department of Defense)
- Design/Build Embassy Housing — $157.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200512!501265!2100!w912er!transatlantic Program Center !w912er04d0008 !A!N! !N!0003 ! !20050928!20061231!006954432!006954432!006954432!n!perini Corporation !73 Mount Wayte AVE !framingham !MA!01701!00000! !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000119283840!n!n!000000000000!y159!other Industrial Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !* !236220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!2!001!b! !Z!N!A! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $127.2M (Department of Defense)
- Design/Build Hurricane Rebuild Task Order for SAN Juan Phase II East Base BID and Option 5: SE X Waterfront Boat Ramp — $117.0M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Ffp/Satoc Saudi Arabia (FMS) F-15 Modernizaiton Program, Khurais Electronic Warfare Range., Psab 13-0004 — $106.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)