DoD's $103.5M HF MANPACK COMSEC contract awarded to L3Harris, raising questions about competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $103,524,108 ($103.5M)

Contractor: L3harris Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-08-21

End Date: 2009-06-11

Contract Duration: 660 days

Daily Burn Rate: $156.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: HF MANPACK COMSEC

Place of Performance

Location: ROCHESTER, MONROE County, NEW YORK, 14610

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $103.5 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: HF MANPACK COMSEC Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $103.5 million for High Frequency Manpack Communications Security equipment. 2. Awarded to a single vendor, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., indicating potential lack of robust competition. 3. Contract duration spans from 2007 to 2009, suggesting older technology or long-term sustainment. 4. The 'NOT COMPETED' status is a key risk factor for taxpayer value.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $103.5 million for HF MANPACK COMSEC equipment is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar systems or if it was inflated due to a lack of alternatives.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was explicitly 'NOT COMPETED' and awarded sole-source to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government as there was no market pressure to offer the best price.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition on a $103.5 million contract likely resulted in taxpayers paying a premium for the required communications security equipment.

Public Impact

Special Operations Command relies on this equipment for secure communications, impacting operational effectiveness. The sole-source award raises concerns about the government's ability to secure advanced communication technology at the best possible price. Long-term reliance on a single vendor could stifle innovation and create vendor lock-in for critical defense systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing sector. Spending in this area is critical for national defense, but competitive procurement is essential to ensure cost-effectiveness for taxpayer-funded systems.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as it was a sole-source award to a large corporation, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests a potential lapse in competitive sourcing strategies. Further oversight is needed to understand why this significant contract was not opened to a competitive bidding process, ensuring accountability for procurement decisions.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

radio-and-television-broadcasting-and-wi, department-of-defense, ny, do, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $103.5 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. HF MANPACK COMSEC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $103.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-08-21. End: 2009-06-11.

What was the justification for the sole-source award of this $103.5 million contract, and were alternative solutions or vendors ever considered?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of viable alternatives. For this $103.5 million contract, the specific justification from the Department of Defense and U.S. Special Operations Command is not provided in the data. Without this, it's impossible to determine if other vendors or solutions were evaluated or if the sole-source decision was fully warranted, impacting the assessment of overall value.

Given the sole-source nature and the 2007 award date, what is the risk of the technology being outdated and the price being non-competitive?

There is a significant risk that technology procured in 2007 may be outdated by current standards, especially in the rapidly evolving field of communications security. A sole-source award exacerbates this risk, as the government lacks the leverage of competition to ensure the price paid reflects current market value or to incentivize the vendor to offer updated technology. This could lead to both operational deficiencies and financial inefficiency for the taxpayer.

How effectively did this contract support the critical communication needs of U.S. Special Operations Command, and what was the long-term impact of this procurement strategy?

While the contract undoubtedly supplied necessary equipment, the sole-source nature raises questions about its long-term effectiveness and value. It's unclear if SOCOM received the most advanced or cost-effective solutions available. The lack of competition may have limited SOCOM's access to broader technological advancements and potentially set a precedent for future sole-source awards, impacting overall defense procurement efficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommunications Equipment ManufacturingRadio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: L3harris Technologies, Inc (UEI: 004203337)

Address: 1680 UNIVERSITY AVE, ROCHESTER, NY, 25

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $103,524,108

Exercised Options: $103,524,108

Current Obligation: $103,524,108

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9222207D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-08-21

Current End Date: 2009-06-11

Potential End Date: 2009-06-11 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-05-13

More Contracts from L3harris Technologies, Inc.

View all L3harris Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending