DoD's $52.1M Federal Express airlift contract delivered freight transportation services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $52,122,016 ($52.1M)
Contractor: Federal Express Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-10-01
End Date: 2008-09-30
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $142.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 32
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Transportation
Official Description: CRAF AIRLIFT
Place of Performance
Location: MEMPHIS, SHELBY County, TENNESSEE, 38118
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $52.1 million to FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION for work described as: CRAF AIRLIFT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in rapid cargo movement. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding environment. 3. Performance context is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of airlift services. 4. Sector positioning highlights the critical role of air cargo in logistics. 5. Value for money is assessed by comparing costs to similar airlift operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of approximately $52.1 million for one year of service appears reasonable for specialized airlift operations. Benchmarking against similar Department of Defense (DoD) contracts for chartered freight air transportation would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Given the fixed-price nature, cost control is likely built into the agreement, but the specific per-unit cost of cargo moved is not detailed here.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely invited to bid. The presence of 32 bids suggests a robust competitive landscape, which generally benefits the government by driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The high number of bidders implies that Federal Express Corporation likely offered a competitive proposal.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for airlift services helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently, securing the best possible price for essential transportation needs.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from reliable and rapid air cargo delivery. Services provided include nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation. The geographic impact is national, supporting military logistics across various locations. Workforce implications include support for pilots, ground crew, and logistics personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for price fluctuations in future contract renewals.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical airlift needs.
- Ensuring consistent service quality and on-time delivery across all operations.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
- Fixed-price contract structure can provide cost certainty.
- High number of bids suggests strong vendor interest and potential for good pricing.
Sector Analysis
The air transportation services sector is vital for global logistics and supply chains, particularly for government agencies requiring rapid and reliable movement of goods. This contract falls within the broader category of transportation and logistics services, a market characterized by significant investment in infrastructure and technology. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar airlift contracts within the DoD or other federal agencies would provide further context on the scale and pricing of this award.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract included specific small business set-asides. Federal Express Corporation, as a large prime contractor, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, but the primary award was not directed towards small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting opportunities generated by this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of USTRANSCOM, responsible for managing the DoD's global transportation network. Accountability measures would include performance metrics, delivery schedules, and adherence to contractual terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific operational details may be sensitive.
Related Government Programs
- Military Airlift Command
- Air Mobility Command
- Logistics Readiness Commands
Risk Flags
- Contract duration
- Performance metrics not specified
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown
Tags
transportation, department-of-defense, federal-express-corporation, airlift, freight-transportation, full-and-open-competition, fixed-price, delivery-order, tennessee, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $52.1 million to FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION. CRAF AIRLIFT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (USTRANSCOM).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $52.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-10-01. End: 2008-09-30.
What was the historical spending pattern for nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation by the Department of Defense prior to this contract?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation by the Department of Defense prior to this contract (awarded in 2007) would reveal trends in demand, pricing, and contractor utilization. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to ascertain if the $52.1 million awarded to Federal Express Corporation in 2007-2008 represented an increase, decrease, or stable level of expenditure. Such analysis would typically involve reviewing previous contract awards for similar services, considering factors like inflation, changes in military operational tempo, and the evolution of air cargo capabilities. Understanding these patterns is crucial for assessing the long-term budgetary implications and strategic importance of such contracts.
How did the per-unit cost of cargo moved under this contract compare to other Federal Express contracts or similar government contracts?
Determining the precise per-unit cost of cargo moved under this specific contract is challenging without access to detailed delivery data (e.g., weight, volume, distance for each shipment). Federal Express Corporation, as a commercial entity, likely has internal metrics for cost per pound-mile or similar benchmarks. For comparison, government agencies often track cost per ton-mile or cost per shipment. If this contract was competitively bid, the pricing structure would have been evaluated against market rates. A comprehensive comparison would require access to the bid proposals and potentially post-award performance data, which are not publicly available. However, the fact that it was a full and open competition with 32 bids suggests the pricing was likely competitive within the market at the time.
What specific performance metrics were used to evaluate Federal Express Corporation's service delivery under this contract?
While the specific performance metrics are not detailed in the provided data, government contracts for airlift services typically include stringent performance standards. These often encompass on-time pickup and delivery rates, cargo condition upon arrival (damage/loss rates), flight schedule adherence, and compliance with safety and security regulations. For a contract of this nature, key performance indicators (KPIs) would likely have been established and monitored by USTRANSCOM. Failure to meet these metrics could result in penalties, reduced payment, or even contract termination. The fixed-price nature of the contract implies a focus on delivering the specified services within the agreed budget, with performance metrics ensuring the quality and reliability of those services.
What was the total value of Federal Express Corporation's contracts with the Department of Defense during the period 2007-2008?
To determine the total value of Federal Express Corporation's contracts with the Department of Defense during 2007-2008, one would need to access comprehensive federal procurement databases (like USASpending.gov or FPDS-NG) and filter for all contracts awarded to Federal Express Corporation by the DoD within that specific timeframe. This $52.1 million contract for nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation represents only one award. Federal Express likely holds numerous other contracts for various services, potentially including mail delivery, express package services, and other specialized transportation needs across different DoD components. A full accounting would require a detailed search and aggregation of all awarded contract values.
How does the duration of this contract (365 days) compare to typical durations for similar government airlift contracts?
A contract duration of 365 days, as seen in this award, is relatively common for service contracts, particularly those involving ongoing operational needs like freight air transportation. Many government service contracts are awarded for one base year with options for renewal, allowing for flexibility and periodic re-evaluation of requirements and pricing. Longer-term contracts (e.g., multi-year) might be used for more stable, predictable requirements, while shorter durations can be employed when needs are more dynamic or when market conditions warrant frequent re-competition. For airlift services, a one-year term provides a balance, ensuring service continuity while allowing the agency to adapt to changing logistical demands or market shifts.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Nonscheduled Air Transportation › Nonscheduled Chartered Freight Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: TRANSPORT, TRAVEL, RELOCATION › TRAVEL, LODGING, RECRUITMENT SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 32
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Fedex Corp
Address: 3131 DEMOCRAT RD BLDG D, MEMPHIS, TN, 38118
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $52,122,016
Exercised Options: $52,122,016
Current Obligation: $52,122,016
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HTC71107D0021
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-10-01
Current End Date: 2008-09-30
Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-05-30
More Contracts from Federal Express Corporation
- Civil Reserve AIR Fleet - AIR Transportation Services — $220.4M (Department of Defense)
- Civil Reserve AIR Fleet - AIR Transportation Services — $163.3M (Department of Defense)
- Civil Reserve AIR Fleet - AIR Transportation Services — $161.0M (Department of Defense)
- Civil Reserve AIR Fleet - AIR Transportation Services — $147.4M (Department of Defense)
- Civil Reserve AIR Fleet - AIR Transportation Services — $145.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)