Commerce awarded $22.1M for engineering services, with CSRA LLC as the prime contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,174,585 ($22.2M)

Contractor: Csra LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2003-09-26

End Date: 2012-02-03

Contract Duration: 3,052 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.3K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUITLAND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: SUITLAND, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20746

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $22.2 million to CSRA LLC for work described as: SUITLAND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract's duration of over 8 years suggests a long-term need for these engineering services. 2. A single delivery order under this contract indicates a focused scope of work. 3. The Time and Materials pricing structure can pose cost control challenges if not closely managed. 4. The contract was awarded competitively, which generally supports better pricing and value. 5. The prime contractor, CSRA LLC, has a significant presence in the federal IT and engineering services market. 6. The geographic location of performance in Maryland aligns with federal agency presence in the region.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award amount of $22.1 million over an 8-year period represents a moderate investment for engineering services. Benchmarking against similar long-term engineering support contracts within NOAA or the broader Department of Commerce would provide a clearer picture of value. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model, while flexible, requires diligent oversight to ensure costs remain aligned with the value delivered and do not escalate beyond reasonable market rates for the specialized engineering expertise provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through a competitive process, indicating that multiple offerors had the opportunity to bid. The specific details of the competition, such as the number of bids received, are not provided in the summary data. However, a full and open competition generally fosters a more robust price discovery process and encourages contractors to offer competitive terms.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used more efficiently, as the government had multiple options to choose from, driving down costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely NOAA and other Department of Commerce agencies requiring specialized engineering and technical support. The services delivered are engineering services, crucial for the operational and developmental needs of oceanic and atmospheric programs. The geographic impact is primarily in Maryland, where the contract was performed. The contract supports a workforce of engineers and technical specialists, contributing to specialized federal employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector supports a wide range of government functions, from defense and infrastructure to research and development. Federal spending in engineering services is substantial, reflecting the government's reliance on specialized expertise for complex projects. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be assessed against other NOAA or Department of Commerce contracts for similar engineering support.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside criterion for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside requirement. The prime contractor, CSRA LLC, would determine any subcontracting opportunities based on their own business strategy and project needs.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Department of Commerce. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement and delivery terms. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG, where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-commerce, noaa, competitive-delivery-order, time-and-materials, maryland, csra-llc, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, federal-contracting, long-term-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $22.2 million to CSRA LLC. SUITLAND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSRA LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-26. End: 2012-02-03.

What was the specific scope of engineering services provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 541330, 'Engineering Services.' While the specific scope isn't detailed, this typically encompasses a broad range of activities including design, development, consulting, and project management related to engineering disciplines. For NOAA, these services could relate to meteorological equipment, oceanic research vessels, satellite systems, or environmental monitoring infrastructure. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure suggests that the exact hours and materials needed may have been variable or difficult to predict at the outset, requiring flexibility in the contract's execution.

How does the $22.1 million award compare to other engineering service contracts within NOAA?

Without access to a comprehensive database of NOAA's engineering service contracts, a direct comparison is challenging. However, $22.1 million over an 8-year period ($2.76 million annually on average) represents a moderate-sized contract. NOAA, as a large agency with significant scientific and operational missions, likely awards contracts ranging from smaller, specialized task orders to much larger, multi-year programs. This contract's value would be considered typical for ongoing, specialized engineering support rather than a large-scale infrastructure project or major system acquisition. Further analysis would require benchmarking against contracts with similar service descriptions and durations.

What are the potential risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure for this contract?

The primary risk with a T&M contract is the potential for cost escalation if not managed rigorously. Unlike fixed-price contracts, the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used. This can lead to higher-than-anticipated costs if project scope creeps, inefficiencies arise, or if the contractor's labor rates are not competitive. Effective oversight, including detailed review of timesheets, material invoices, and regular progress reporting, is crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value for its investment. The long duration of this contract amplifies the importance of sustained oversight.

What is the track record of CSRA LLC in delivering engineering services to the federal government?

CSRA LLC (now part of General Dynamics Information Technology) has a substantial track record in providing a wide array of IT and engineering services to various federal agencies. Historically, CSRA has been involved in large-scale IT modernization, cybersecurity, and mission support contracts. While specific performance details for this particular NOAA contract (awarded in 2003) are not detailed in the summary data, the company's longevity and continued presence in the federal contracting space suggest a generally positive performance history. Federal procurement data would offer more granular insights into past performance ratings and past performance questionnaires for similar contracts.

How has federal spending on engineering services evolved over the life of this contract (2003-2012)?

The period from 2003 to 2012 saw significant fluctuations in federal spending, influenced by factors such as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, economic stimulus efforts, and evolving technological needs. Spending on engineering services, particularly those supporting defense, infrastructure, and scientific research, generally remained robust. For agencies like NOAA, engineering support is often tied to long-term scientific missions and infrastructure maintenance, suggesting a relatively stable demand. However, overall federal budget constraints and shifting priorities could have impacted the availability of funds for new engineering contracts or the expansion of existing ones during this timeframe.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 7700 HUBBLE DR, LANHAM SEABROOK, MD, 04

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,200,000

Exercised Options: $22,174,585

Current Obligation: $22,174,585

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0092K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-09-26

Current End Date: 2012-02-03

Potential End Date: 2012-02-03 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-05-22

More Contracts from Csra LLC

View all Csra LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending