DoD Defense Information Technology Contract Awarded to SETA Corporation for $17.5M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,747,990 ($11.7M)

Contractor: Apptis, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-03-06

End Date: 2007-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,669 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200312!002347!9700!ZD11 !DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20002D5000 !A!N! !N!000803 !20030306!20030630!175320761!175320761!175320761!N!SETA CORPORATION !6862 ELM STREET, 6TH FLOOR!MCLEAN !VA!22101!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000000844000!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !517110!E! !5!B!S!B! !C!20021004!B!F!N!A! !A!U!Y!2!006!K! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!A! ! ! !C!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! !HC1046!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FALLS CHURCH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22040

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to APPTIS, INC. for work described as: 200312!002347!9700!ZD11 !DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20002D5000 !A!N! !N!000803 !20030306!20030630!175320761!175320761!175320761!N!SETA CORPORATION !6862 ELM STREET, 6TH FLOOR!MCLEAN !VA!22101!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000000844000!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTH… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to SETA Corporation for Defense Information Technology services. 2. The contract value is $17.5 million over its duration. 3. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a potentially competitive process. 4. The sector is Defense Information Technology, a critical area for national security. 5. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $17.5 million for IT services appears within a reasonable range for a multi-year defense contract. However, without specific service details and benchmarks for similar contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates an initial competitive process, but the exclusion of certain sources might limit the breadth of competition and potentially impact price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition generally aims for the best value for taxpayers. However, the specific method of excluding sources warrants scrutiny to ensure maximum competition was achieved.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation of critical defense information technology systems. Supports the Defense Information Systems Agency's mission. Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure. Impact on small businesses is not explicitly detailed in this award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 70 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense Information Technology sector, which is a significant area of government spending. Benchmarks for similar IT services contracts within the DoD can vary widely based on complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses for this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had opportunities to participate or subcontract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Defense Information Systems Agency, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms for this specific contract requires further review.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

wired-telecommunications-carriers, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to APPTIS, INC.. 200312!002347!9700!ZD11 !DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!DCA20002D5000 !A!N! !N!000803 !20030306!20030630!175320761!175320761!175320761!N!SETA CORPORATION !6862 ELM STREET, 6TH FLOOR!MCLEAN !VA!22101!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000000844000!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !517110!E! !5!B!S!B! !C!20021004!B!F!N!A! !A!U!Y!2!006!K! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!A! ! ! !C!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! !HC1046!0001! !

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is APPTIS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-03-06. End: 2007-09-30.

What specific IT services are being procured under this contract, and how do they align with current defense needs?

The contract is for 'OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES' (NAICS 517110). While broadly defined, these services likely encompass network management, telecommunications support, and potentially IT infrastructure maintenance crucial for the Defense Information Systems Agency's operations. The specific alignment with evolving defense requirements would necessitate a review of the contract's statement of work and any subsequent modifications.

What is the justification for excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award method?

The exclusion of sources typically requires a documented justification, such as specific technical capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs that only certain vendors can meet. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the exclusion was necessary and if it truly served the government's best interest or potentially limited competition unfairly.

How effectively does the Time and Materials pricing structure mitigate risks associated with cost overruns for these IT services?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts are inherently susceptible to cost overruns as they reimburse actual labor hours and material costs. While the contract has a ceiling, effective oversight, detailed task orders, and robust monitoring by the contracting officer are crucial to manage costs. The government's ability to control scope and efficiently manage vendor performance is key to mitigating T&M risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationWired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite)Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 4800 WESTFIELDS BLVD STE 1, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DCA20002D5000

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-03-06

Current End Date: 2007-09-30

Potential End Date: 2007-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-09-11

More Contracts from Apptis, Inc.

View all Apptis, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending