DoD's $47.3M ONESAF Production Effort Awarded to Leidos, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,311,841 ($47.3M)

Contractor: Leidos, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-09-23

End Date: 2017-03-20

Contract Duration: 2,005 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ONESAF PRODUCTION EFFORT

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32826

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $47.3 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: ONESAF PRODUCTION EFFORT Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $47.3 million, was awarded to Leidos, Inc. for the ONESAF Production Effort. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust price discovery process. 3. The contract duration spans from 2011 to 2017, indicating a medium-term project. 4. The sector is classified under 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing', with a PSC code of 333319. 5. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract, with two modifications noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The total award value of $47.3M over several years needs to be assessed against the delivered capabilities to determine true value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, as multiple bidders likely competed. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition aims to secure the best value for taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment among potential contractors.

Public Impact

Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding processes that aim to reduce costs. The ONESAF Production Effort likely supports critical Department of Defense operations. The duration of the contract suggests a sustained need for the services or products provided. Leidos, Inc. is a major government contractor, indicating significant industry players are involved.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' sector, with a PSC code of 333319. This broad category encompasses a wide range of machinery production. Benchmarking spending in this specific niche requires detailed market analysis.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Leidos, Inc., a large business. There is no indication of small business participation or subcontracting in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was subject to modifications, indicating potential oversight and adjustments during its lifecycle. Further review of modification details would be necessary to assess the effectiveness of oversight.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-commercial-and-service-industry-ma, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $47.3 million to LEIDOS, INC.. ONESAF PRODUCTION EFFORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-23. End: 2017-03-20.

What specific capabilities or products did the ONESAF Production Effort deliver, and how do these align with the $47.3M investment?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the ONESAF Production Effort. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of deliverables, their technical specifications, and their operational impact within the Department of Defense is required. Without this, it's difficult to definitively state if the $47.3M investment yielded commensurate capabilities or products.

What were the primary risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this effort, and how were they mitigated?

CPFF contracts carry inherent risks of cost overruns as the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs plus a fixed fee. Potential risks include lack of incentive for cost control and potential for scope creep. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust government oversight, detailed performance metrics, and strict change control processes to manage costs and scope effectively.

How effective was the full and open competition in achieving the best possible price and technical solution for the ONESAF Production Effort?

Full and open competition is generally effective in driving competitive pricing and encouraging innovative solutions. However, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the specific market dynamics, the clarity of the solicitation requirements, and the evaluation criteria used. Without access to the bidding process details and the number of bids received, it's challenging to definitively assess the degree of price and technical advantage gained.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommercial and Service Industry Machinery ManufacturingOther Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W900KK08R0001

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Address: 11951 FREEDOM DR, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $54,852,724

Exercised Options: $51,679,940

Current Obligation: $47,311,841

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 22

Total Subaward Amount: $1,561,686

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W900KK09D0323

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-09-23

Current End Date: 2017-03-20

Potential End Date: 2017-03-20 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-12-20

More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.

View all Leidos, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending