DoD's $68.6M Fort Gordon Barracks Complex Phase II contract awarded to Caddell Construction Co. for building construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $68,606,299 ($68.6M)

Contractor: Caddell Construction CO. (DE), LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-11-06

End Date: 2017-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,059 days

Daily Burn Rate: $64.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF - AIT BARRACKS COMPLEX PHASE II PN 51868,&GROUND SOURCE HEAT TRANSFER SYSTEM PN 77419, FT. GORDON, GA

Place of Performance

Location: AUGUSTA, RICHMOND County, GEORGIA, 30909

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $68.6 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. (DE), LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF - AIT BARRACKS COMPLEX PHASE II PN 51868,&GROUND SOURCE HEAT TRANSFER SYSTEM PN 77419, FT. GORDON, GA Key points: 1. The contract value of $68.6 million represents a significant investment in military infrastructure. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The project duration of approximately 3 years indicates a substantial construction undertaking. 5. The contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code. 6. Geographically located in Georgia, potentially impacting the local construction labor market.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $68.6 million for a barracks complex phase II and ground source heat transfer system appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale military construction projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests the government secured a defined cost, but the final cost-effectiveness depends on the contractor's efficiency and adherence to specifications.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and terms for the government. The open competition suggests that the agency sought the best value from a wide range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions, ultimately leading to a more efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

Service members stationed at Fort Gordon will benefit from improved living quarters. The project delivers essential infrastructure upgrades for military personnel. The geographic impact is concentrated in Georgia, potentially creating local construction jobs. The construction activities will likely involve a significant workforce, including skilled trades.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise during construction.
Delays in project completion could impact troop housing readiness.
Ensuring compliance with environmental regulations during construction is crucial.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract mitigates budget uncertainty for the government.
Award to an established construction company suggests a degree of contractor reliability.
The project addresses a critical need for modern military housing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The market for large-scale military construction is substantial, driven by ongoing modernization and infrastructure needs within the Department of Defense. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other barracks construction projects or similar facility developments across various military branches and geographic locations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC is the prime contractor, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the construction trades. The extent of small business subcontracting would need further investigation to assess its impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically involve the Department of the Army contracting officers, project managers, and potentially the Department of Defense's Inspector General. Accountability measures would include adherence to contract terms, performance milestones, and quality control. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Military Housing Construction
Department of Defense Infrastructure Projects
Fort Gordon Facilities Modernization
Ground Source Heat Pump Systems in Federal Buildings

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns
Risk of schedule delays
Ensuring contractor performance and quality

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $68.6 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. (DE), LLC. IGF::OT::IGF - AIT BARRACKS COMPLEX PHASE II PN 51868,&GROUND SOURCE HEAT TRANSFER SYSTEM PN 77419, FT. GORDON, GA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. (DE), LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $68.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-11-06. End: 2017-09-30.

What is the track record of Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC on similar federal construction projects?

Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC has a significant history of performing large-scale federal construction projects, particularly for the Department of Defense and other government agencies. Their portfolio often includes military barracks, training facilities, and other critical infrastructure. Analyzing their past performance on similar projects, including any history of cost overruns, schedule delays, or contract disputes, would provide valuable insight into their reliability and capability for this specific Fort Gordon project. Reviewing contract award data and performance evaluations from previous government contracts would be essential for a comprehensive assessment of their track record.

How does the awarded price compare to similar military barracks construction projects?

To benchmark the $68.6 million award for the Fort Gordon Barracks Complex Phase II, a comparative analysis with similar military barracks construction projects is necessary. This would involve identifying contracts with comparable square footage, number of personnel housed, complexity of systems (like the ground source heat transfer system), and geographic location. Factors such as prevailing labor costs, material prices, and site conditions in Georgia would need to be considered. Without specific comparable contract data, it is difficult to definitively state whether this award represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests a defined cost ceiling for the government.

What are the primary risks associated with this construction project?

The primary risks associated with this construction project include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen site conditions (e.g., subsurface soil issues, environmental contamination), material price fluctuations, and labor shortages. Schedule delays could arise from weather impacts, supply chain disruptions, or contractor performance issues. There's also a risk related to the integration and performance of the ground source heat transfer system, which requires specialized expertise. Ensuring robust quality control and effective project management by both the contractor and the government oversight team are critical to mitigating these risks.

How effective is the ground source heat transfer system likely to be in this climate?

Ground source heat transfer systems are generally highly effective and energy-efficient across a wide range of climates, including Georgia's. They leverage the stable temperature of the earth to provide heating and cooling. The effectiveness in Georgia would depend on proper system design, including the depth and length of the ground loops, the specific soil thermal conductivity, and the overall building's heating and cooling load. While initial installation costs can be higher than conventional systems, the long-term operational savings and reduced environmental impact are significant advantages. Proper commissioning and maintenance are key to ensuring sustained performance.

What is the historical spending trend for military construction at Fort Gordon?

Analyzing historical spending trends for military construction at Fort Gordon would provide context for the $68.6 million award. This involves examining past contracts awarded for facility upgrades, new construction, and infrastructure improvements at the base over several fiscal years. Understanding the volume and value of previous projects can reveal patterns of investment, identify recurring needs, and highlight any significant shifts in spending priorities. Such an analysis could also reveal if this project represents a continuation of a larger modernization effort or a standalone initiative, and whether spending has been consistent or variable.

What are the implications of the firm-fixed-price contract type for project management?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type places the primary responsibility for cost control and managing unforeseen expenses on the contractor, Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC. This means the government has a defined ceiling for the project cost, which is beneficial for budget predictability. However, it also means the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. Effective project management from the government's perspective will focus on ensuring the contractor meets all performance specifications, quality standards, and delivery schedules within the agreed-upon price. Changes to the scope of work under an FFP contract typically require formal change order negotiations, which can impact the overall cost and schedule.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912HN09R0088

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Caddell Construction CO., Inc. (UEI: 102087285)

Address: 2700 LAGOON PARK DR, MONTGOMERY, AL, 36109

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $68,768,299

Exercised Options: $68,768,299

Current Obligation: $68,606,299

Contract Characteristics

Consolidated Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912HN10D0044

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline