DoD Awards $110.7M for Engineering Technical Services to Computer Sciences Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $110,743,988 ($110.7M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-07-01
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,917 days
Daily Burn Rate: $57.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: 200510!059546!1700!N00178!NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER !N0017804D4030 !A!N! !Y!0006 ! !20050701!20050930!043991108!043991108!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!21008!099!51!DAHLGREN !KING GEORGE !VIRGINIA !+000001293120!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !1700!N00178!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20003, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $110.7 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC. for work described as: 200510!059546!1700!N00178!NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER !N0017804D4030 !A!N! !Y!0006 ! !20050701!20050930!043991108!043991108!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!21008!099!51!DAHLGREN !KING GEORGE !VIRGINIA !+000001293120!N!N… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Engineering Technical Services to Computer Sciences Corporation. 2. Significant value of $110.7 million over 5 years. 3. Full and open competition was utilized. 4. The sector is primarily Engineering Services, a critical area for defense operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $110.7 million over approximately 5 years suggests a substantial investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering services contracts is necessary for a precise assessment, but the duration and scope indicate a significant but potentially reasonable price point.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The use of Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) structure allows for flexibility while incentivizing performance.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is designed to maximize taxpayer value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and improves service quality.
Public Impact
Ensures continued provision of critical engineering and technical support to the Naval Surface Warfare Center. Supports advanced naval technology development and maintenance. Potential for job creation within the engineering and technical services sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns with Cost Plus Award Fee contracts if not managed tightly.
- Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or evolving requirements not fully captured in initial pricing.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition likely secured competitive pricing.
- Award to a known entity (Computer Sciences Corporation) suggests established capabilities.
- Contract supports critical defense infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is vital for the Department of Defense's technological advancement and operational readiness. Spending in this sector is often substantial due to the complexity and criticality of defense systems.
Small Business Impact
While the primary awardee is a large corporation, the nature of large-scale engineering contracts may involve subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, though this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of full and open competition and the Cost Plus Award Fee structure suggest mechanisms for oversight. However, detailed oversight reports and performance reviews would be necessary to fully assess accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns with CPA structure.
- Long contract duration may lead to evolving requirements.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided summary.
- Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses not explicitly stated.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, dc, do, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $110.7 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC.. 200510!059546!1700!N00178!NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER !N0017804D4030 !A!N! !Y!0006 ! !20050701!20050930!043991108!043991108!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!21008!099!51!DAHLGREN !KING GEORGE !VIRGINIA !+000001293120!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !1700!N00178!0001! !
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $110.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-07-01. End: 2010-09-30.
What specific engineering and technical services are included under this contract, and how do they align with current naval warfare priorities?
The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' under NAICS code 541330. These services likely encompass a broad range of activities supporting the Naval Surface Warfare Center, potentially including research, development, testing, evaluation, and sustainment of naval systems and technologies. Alignment with current priorities would depend on the specific tasks outlined in the contract's statement of work, which is not fully detailed here but is crucial for understanding its strategic value.
How effectively were cost controls implemented given the Cost Plus Award Fee structure, and what were the final award fees paid?
The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) structure allows for flexibility but requires robust oversight to manage costs effectively. Without access to performance reports and final award fee determinations, it's difficult to assess cost control effectiveness. The government's ability to incentivize desired outcomes while preventing excessive spending is key. Future analysis should examine the relationship between target costs, actual costs, and awarded fees.
What was the competitive landscape like for this specific engineering services requirement, and did full and open competition yield significant cost savings compared to other procurement methods?
The data indicates 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' was used, suggesting a broad solicitation to all eligible offerors. This method is generally expected to yield competitive pricing. While the exact cost savings compared to other methods (like sole-source or limited competition) are not quantified here, the principle is that a wider pool of bidders drives down prices and increases innovation, ultimately benefiting taxpayers through better value for money.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0002405R3084
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)
Address: 3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4030
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-07-01
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-02-25
More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology Inc.
- Global Security Engineering&supply Chain Services — $1.5B (Department of State)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a NEW Contract With General Dynamics Information Technology for Global Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Technology Development Services to Support the Department of State. the Initial Funding Associated With This Contract IS $22,304,578.00. the Overall Contract Value IS $2,200,000,000.00 — $1.2B (Department of State)
- Cloud Products&tools (CPT) — $902.0M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Beneficiary Contact Center Operations — $879.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Award of Task Order 47qfca210051-Nawcad Wolf Ship and AIR C5isr Systems Support — $832.3M (General Services Administration)
View all General Dynamics Information Technology Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)